Having doubts about this one.
Posted under General
Having doubts about this one.
Madame_Remilia said:
Hello, does an image count as AI-assisted if an artist took inspiration from an AI-generated image but they don't use AI themselves ? I know it counts as derivative work but I am curious if that also counts as AI-assisted, thank you.
No it does not. It should be tagged ai-generated art (topic) though.
post #8178124 looks quite suspicious to me
Nonsensical hair strands, artifacting all over...
Freshblink said:
Apparently this artist https://danbooru.donmai.us/artists/334914 has been making all their stuff with AI assistance. Twitter thread here https://x.com/Duffmox/status/1834238572196446519 and there are some obvious instances like this post https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6286552?q=masoq where left hand fingers dont line up.
300+ illustrations in a year were a pretty good tip off tbh.
Should we mass tag everything as AI-assisted? I think most of it is danbooru quality and doesnt need flag.
For post #8180815, they posted a making-of on Twitter. I haven't kept up with all the discourse over masoq or all the techniques to spot AI. Not sure if this is sufficient to remove some or all of the ai-assisted or ai-generated tags on their art. post #7837628 and post #7832703 were also recently flagged and deleted because of the AI accusations maybe those could be appealed if he's exonerated (Though the second post is meh to me irregardless of how it was made.).
Updated
MaskedAvenger said:
Having doubts about this one.
Stumbled upon that account a while ago and my impression was that it's all AI.
asset #23200605
Also having doubts.
MaskedAvenger said:
asset #23200605
Also having doubts.
This is likely AI.
No artist credit, low resolution, sourceless direct upload from new user... not 100% sure this is AI, but about 85-ish?
Edit: Never mind. Someone else flagged it as AI-generated.
Minitajfun said:
I wouldn't be shocked. Everything by this artist looks suspect.
post #7779150 and post #7057508 have the typical AI shading. Traced AI, maybe? The lines definitely look weird, but I'm not sure if that's just my personal preference for lineart seeping through.
Minitajfun said:
sabisabi said:
I wouldn't be shocked. Everything by this artist looks suspect.
post #7779150 and post #7057508 have the typical AI shading. Traced AI, maybe? The lines definitely look weird, but I'm not sure if that's just my personal preference for lineart seeping through.
+1 there's definitely AI involvement in these 4 posts. Looking at the artist's past works, from about post #6574253 and onwards it suddenly looks very AI-y out of nowhere.
Unlikely to be AI, but just running it by due to comment section discussion. https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8113061
sabisabi said:
I wouldn't be shocked. Everything by this artist looks suspect.
post #7779150 and post #7057508 have the typical AI shading. Traced AI, maybe? The lines definitely look weird, but I'm not sure if that's just my personal preference for lineart seeping through.
ANON_TOKYO said:
+1 there's definitely AI involvement in these 4 posts. Looking at the artist's past works, from about post #6574253 and onwards it suddenly looks very AI-y out of nowhere.
To add to the argument: post #6883786
Look at the hands and their linework + rendering. It's a lot less polished than the entire rest of the image as if that was the only hand-drawn thing. Note also the very weird tree through the window. Also why is there a framed photo peaking into the frame on the same table she's reading the book on?
vipguy64 said:
For post #8180815, they posted a making-of on Twitter. I haven't kept up with all the discourse over masoq or all the techniques to spot AI. Not sure if this is sufficient to remove some or all of the ai-assisted or ai-generated tags on their art. post #7837628 and post #7832703 were also recently flagged and deleted because of the AI accusations maybe those could be appealed if he's exonerated (Though the second post is meh to me irregardless of how it was made.).
He posted a response to all of this which is pretty damning; claims to just be "bad at hands", but he made a rookie mistake, said that he merged the layers of a photo he sent to a client (which was shown in the thread sparking this) then called it a "WIP" for basically shits and giggles.
Someone also pointed out that he posted two Brazillian Mikus on the same day that still had different coloring, shading, and hair lineart.
hanwen1234 said:
He posted a response to all of this which is pretty damning; claims to just be "bad at hands", but he made a rookie mistake, said that he merged the layers of a photo he sent to a client (which was shown in the thread sparking this) then called it a "WIP" for basically shits and giggles.
Someone also pointed out that he posted two Brazillian Mikus on the same day that still had different coloring, shading, and hair lineart.
i have found an old tracing controversy involving soulnark that already implicated the masoq account as an alt of soulnark
Updated
Hereinafter said:
Can't say, it has some errors like the butterfly hair ornament coloring being asymmetrical and a strange feel, but everything else is on point.
Artist drew a single thing ever so no comparatives.