ANON_TOKYO said:
Flagged, I'm not convinced but also not un-convinced.
This artist has been actively painting prior to 2021, and I'm not noticing any major red flags. I don't think they're AI either.
Posted under General
ANON_TOKYO said:
Flagged, I'm not convinced but also not un-convinced.
This artist has been actively painting prior to 2021, and I'm not noticing any major red flags. I don't think they're AI either.
Need a second opinion of this artist: ninfetto
Said artist began posting on both Pixiv and Twitter in April 2022, the first couple of his/her drawings are rather beginner level, but it suddenly gets a skill upgrade from July of the same year.
The art I want to upload from this artist is this one: pixiv:108719225
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/9046212
Just trying to check
c_spl said:
I don't think their stuff is, but I'm not 100% sure
Their stuff has been online long before AI came out, not sure about the account itself. Either isn't the original author or they came back after nuking their old socials.
https://x.com/tzpzaj/status/1904096448620466318
Might be a better version of post #9046265 but I'm reluctant to upload potentially AI-enhanced stuff. I checked what I could about the account and it doesn't show any signs of belonging to the original artist.
ANON_TOKYO said:
Flagged, I'm not convinced but also not un-convinced.
I am entirely unconvinced that all of this is AI. But it seems that all of their art is set to be deleted from the site, so what the fuck does it matter now.
AYYYYYYMD said:
I am entirely unconvinced that all of this is AI. But it seems that all of their art is set to be deleted from the site, so what the fuck does it matter now.
... That's why I'm posting it here, the flags can be rejected even after the 3 days, that's how the system works. It's not even remotely set in stone.
AYYYYYYMD said:
I am entirely unconvinced that all of this is AI. But it seems that all of their art is set to be deleted from the site, so what the fuck does it matter now.
Wayback Machine has their personal website going back to 2021. However, all the "art" dating back that far is heavily edited renders of what appears to be a VR chat avatar. There's no sketches, no drawings, or anything. Also on that website is a section of heavily edited photography. This person clearly has had a long-standing interest in image editing, with no history of actually producing their own art, until their new style of AI-looking art with paper effects suddenly appears from nowhere in 2023. I tend to think it's AI.
post #9042675
post #9042691
post #9042683
I'm sure that this artist is AI prompter. Patterns on the pocket and skirt frills are not consistent.
エセムビ said:
post #9042675
post #9042691
post #9042683I'm sure that this artist is AI prompter. Patterns on the pocket and skirt frills are not consistent.
Definitely suspicious. Their pixiv only has that image and nude versions that they are trying to sell as body pillow covers on a linked site.
エセムビ said:
post #9042675
post #9042691
post #9042683I'm sure that this artist is AI prompter. Patterns on the pocket and skirt frills are not consistent.
Definitely AI. Broken head in nude version on pixiv. Nah, you can see the head is broken here also in in the area visible through the sunglasses
Updated
CoreMack said:
Wayback Machine has their personal website going back to 2021. However, all the "art" dating back that far is heavily edited renders of what appears to be a VR chat avatar. There's no sketches, no drawings, or anything. Also on that website is a section of heavily edited photography. This person clearly has had a long-standing interest in image editing, with no history of actually producing their own art, until their new style of AI-looking art with paper effects suddenly appears from nowhere in 2023. I tend to think it's AI.
zetsubousensei said:
I'm convinced it's AI
Alright, alright, I see it mow. I apologize for being hotheaded about it.
post #6008119
Was AI this good two years ago?
ion288 said:
post #6008119
Was AI this good two years ago?
No, which is why the fabric, background & hair all are nonsensical in the real classic AI way.
post #9052548, need second opinion. Can't say for sure.
asset #25317682
All three posts on this user's account were uploaded on the same day. Image size may be too large for something AI-gen, but I don't know.
MaskedAvenger said:
asset #25317682
All three posts on this user's account were uploaded on the same day. Image size may be too large for something AI-gen, but I don't know.
Brushwork looks very human and I don't see any artefacting. Might or might not be traced, but definitely not straight up AI gen at least.
https://x.com/choorrrm59/status/1905213039273767142?s=46
Here’s some pieces from Shio, since she deleted all her old works and claimed these were not ai generated( I believe some of them are traced from ai).
And she has these two pictures on danbooru which I suspect are ai generated.
Since many ppl on twitter said they are not ai generated, I’ll post them here to see you guy’s opinions, thank you!
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8763164?q=shio_%28zsp1jqohfr12495%29
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8760023?q=shio_%28zsp1jqohfr12495%29