AI-generated art check thread

ion288 said:

post #8282318 and post #8257803
Should I tag them or reapprove?

talking about post #8282318 the author says they draw similar post (for example this and this other ) and another reason, is this post and this other too looks a bit like Ai, but if you see in the first post the chest you can read UTAu (copyright name) i think that a AI can't put a copyright like that, and in the second post is more cleary, you can read in the coat collar the copyrigh name (UTAU) and in the shield print too, and also you can see in the medal the copyright logo (that is this) I really think that a AI can not put those details in a draw, also the artis demostrate a good drawing level with post that are obviously (for me, that to be honest i'm not a AI art expert) not make with Ai for example this and this other not exist a solid proof that it is a AI creation 100% (maybe AI assistend) but maybe with a program you can see if this is really make 100% with Ai or not, for the moment I will say that is not AI

• post #8194945
• post #7906353
• post #7532838
• post #7056472

These and other posts from indy_k look very AI-generated or at the very least AI-assisted.

https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8294588?q=cang_se_ye_hua - blurry clothes - AI?

Marlor said:

https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8294588?q=cang_se_ye_hua - blurry clothes - AI?

That doesn't look particularly AI-y, and don't add ai-assisted before any discussion is had.

yooyooko said:

• post #8194945
• post #7906353
• post #7532838
• post #7056472

These and other posts from indy_k look very AI-generated or at the very least AI-assisted.

They have posted a timelapse their recent drawings, which has also been added as comment in the following link:
https://danbooru.donmai.us/comments/2451145

ANON_TOKYO said:

That doesn't look particularly AI-y, and don't add ai-assisted before any discussion is had.

Background is AI - I'm pretty certain about it. So the work is assisted at very least.

soshi7087

Looks suspicious at the first glance.

VR-Man said:

soshi7087

Looks suspicious at the first glance.

Definitely appears to be some degree of AI involvement. post #8296504 you can see the pattern on the left sleeve, but on the right sleeve it's messed up and merges with her hair. post #8301182 you can see oddities around the right ear where what starts as hair overlaying over the ear is actually background hair and the ear itself bleeds into the ends of locks of hair. Also the curious case of a lock of hair on the right shoulder that must be detached since it's going down the backside, but it's also going down her front as well.

Marlor said:

Background is AI - I'm pretty certain about it. So the work is assisted at very least.

Since my tag has been twice removed and I got notification that it can lead to ban I had to ask the artist about it https://imgur.com/a/HAB3hVA

post #8302577

Other posts from this artist were deleted for being AI-generated.

post #8303144 looks strange, but it may just be something like the fisheye effect

anonbl said:

post #8303144 looks strange, but it may just be something like the fisheye effect

It was posted in 2013 on pixiv, I doubt it can be AI back then.

Marlor said:

Since my tag has been twice removed and I got notification that it can lead to ban I had to ask the artist about it https://imgur.com/a/HAB3hVA

In this case it's good that there's confirmation, but in general you shouldn't contact artists. Also, it got removed because "I am sure of it" is not a good enough argument, you have to actually discuss it here first.

https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8256626
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/7757038
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8303649

post #8306274

AI generator. Pixiv tags even clearly state it's AI.

post #7777321
An other day an other tagless flag.

Their other content was identified as AI, what about older pictures?

https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/7280357?q=maswaka

post #8307008 and children, manually deleted for AI but their was argument of if they were human. If its just assisted it should have a chance to die in queue.

I've already flagged a few, but honestly I'd argue that anything in status:active width:832 height:1216 date:2022-08-22.. should probably be carefully scrutinized, because 832x1216 is the base resolution of NovelAI and there are only three posts from before SD's release that use that resolution otherwise.

post #8298770
post #8247957
post #8226182

This artist has 14 AI-generated deletions but 3 approvals. Posting these for a quick check to see if they upgraded to (or always had been) AI-assisted or purely human art.