Posted under General
Rastamepas said:
post #1646007 Actually not sure if this is a photoshop or not. Just wanted to put that out there. I thought it was a bigger picture and then noticed after I posted that the cat is missing.
It does seem to be a sort of nude filter and photoshop.
Seems to be just a photoshop collage of offical art and someone else's fanart.
Both the artist and person who commissioned this piece requested that it be deleted. The source link is now a watermark version.
http://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/1694225
Just realized that this is a resized version of http://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/1650025. No wonder it didn't trip in upload check.
Guro, extremely grotesque in every way. I flagged the post, but for some reason the mod that check it didn't think a bunch of women having their limbs chopped off and being raped until pregnant was grotesque enough to be deleted.
Hoobajoob said:
Guro, extremely grotesque in every way. I flagged the post, but for some reason the mod that check it didn't think a bunch of women having their limbs chopped off and being raped until pregnant was grotesque enough to be deleted.
Things generally don't get deleted for being guro. If you don't like guro I'd recommend you set up your blacklist up so you don't have to see it: help:blacklists
Toks said:
If you don't like guro I'd recommend you set up your blacklist up so you don't have to see it: help:blacklists
That's not the problem. The problem is:
Thread rules said:
4.) Just because something violates the TOS doesn't mean its automatic grounds for deletion, although it needs to have good art and not be extreme or vulgar in its content.
Danbooru ToS said:
Prohibited Content
In addition, you may not upload any of the following:
•Grotesque: Any depiction of extreme mutilation, extreme bodily distension, feces, or bodies that are far outside the realm of normal human proportion (for example, breasts that are larger than three heads in size or penises that are larger than two heads in size).
Posting Guidelines said:
Additional Rejection Criteria
Guro, or Extreme graphic violence. This includes severe mutilation of body parts, fetishism of inflicting flesh wounds and live amputation.
What's the point of rules if no one follows them?
Go through guro status:deleted for a better idea of what's actually restricted, that image may be a violation of the letter but it's not of the spirit.
post #1719430. Pasted the wrong link when uploading from Pixiv, and it is not actually a picture.
low quality, recently deleted from Minitokyo
Log said:
Go through guro status:deleted for a better idea of what's actually restricted, that image may be a violation of the letter but it's not of the spirit.
Ok. Then post #1708547 still needs to get deleted. It's the same thing as most of those deleted posts. In fact, a lot of those deleted posts are more tame than this one.
I thought danbooru had rules like this because "high quality" also applies to subject matter and guro/scat are low quality subject matters. Am I wrong about that?
Hoobajoob said:
I thought danbooru had rules like this because "high quality" also applies to subject matter and guro/scat are low quality subject matters. Am I wrong about that?
"High quality" = high quality art. Not subject matter. You personally not liking something doesn't mean it doesn't belong on the site (as long as the art is good).
Hoobajoob said:
Then why the rules against guro, scat and other subject matters in the first place?
In part, the art of a lot of them tend not to be good and they don't have any value outside of that fetish. A pretty low number of posts are rated questionable and explicit, and a lot of what falls under guro is general gore, because of how tagging works. As for that image, its definitely hardcore guro, but its not extreme in the sense that the TOS is referring to.
Again, its worded in an open-ended manner as well, leaving it up to discretion what constitutes its extremity and quality.
A good example is with furry. Some posts are allowed under that umbrella but the ban is there to prevent a much larger dirge of poorly drawn furry fanart with animesque styling.
looks like post #1744321 accidentally made it in
FoolyDooly said:
looks like post #1744321 accidentally made it in
This is more of a ban (which it has been enacted), not a deletion.
post #646709
Obvious compression artifacts plus a higher quality image exists as the parent.
post #442909
post #442908
post #442910
Third party watermarks.
post #450307
Low quality.
Updated
post #1758644 was uploaded only half way.
Double delete please --Log
Updated by Log
