Posted under General
Toks said:
There are no "other users" - the person who created the pool is the only one who has added posts to it.
That person is creating a lot of (pointless) kantai collection pools recently.
I'd say, if it's just the 6 images from the artist's set, the pool can stay. Otherwise, delete.
S1eth said:
That person is creating a lot of (pointless) kantai collection pools recently.
I'd say, if it's just the 6 images from the artist's set, the pool can stay. Otherwise, delete.
I vote for this. If its part of an artist's set, it can stay.
As it is, it becomes way too messy.
I created a separate pool for the 5 images from saki_chisuzu.
pool #7444 should just be deleted.
These are just images that the artist uploaded all at once for convenience - they don't all share continuity, so they don't need a series pool. The same posts can be found with an artist + copyright search: hetza_(hellshock) nagai_gojitsudan_no_nechronica
pool #2093: empty pool. Someone else also request it 1 year ago though.
Toks said:
I created a separate pool for the 5 images from saki_chisuzu.
pool #7444 should just be deleted.
I feel that a tag for their dying messages would be appropriate, I feel that the current dying_message tag is to specific for it to include someone's last words.
Saladofstones said:
I feel that a tag for their dying messages would be appropriate, I feel that the current dying_message tag is to specific for it to include someone's last words.
Maybe last_words?
Or a tag specific to kantai collection, like dying_message_(kantai_collection)?
I say generalize it and go with last_words as you suggested it.
More empty pools, pool #5433 and pool #5041.
Toks said:
Maybe last_words?
Or a tag specific to kantai collection, like dying_message_(kantai_collection)?
I like last words, making it specific to kanti collection would limit the tag way too much.
Its going to be hard to populate the tag, but I'm sure heartbreaking pool and the like will have relevant situations.
dakight said:
More empty pools, pool #5433 and pool #5041.
pool #5041 I deleted, pool #5433 seems to be a placeholder for the ninth popularity contest. I assume that very soon it will be populated, if its a ways off, it can be deleted.
pool #5681 - empty; deletion requested in the title.
Saladofstones said:
pool #5433 seems to be a placeholder for the ninth popularity contest. I assume that very soon it will be populated, if its a ways off, it can be deleted.
It's an accidental dupe of pool #5132, so you can go ahead and delete it.
lolin86 said:
I might have missed something in here but are ALMOST all the "perfect" pools gone? as in ass, waist, face, etc?
They are all gone (except "Feet", "Legs", and "Flowers"). They were too subjective and useless. However, if you have deleted pool's ID, you can browse it, but, obviously, cannot add any image to it.
lolin86 said:
I might have missed something in here but are ALMOST all the "perfect" pools gone? as in ass, waist, face, etc?
pool #6154 should be covered by sexually_suggestive.
Diabolicwave said:
pool #6154 should be covered by sexually_suggestive.
Actually, sexually_suggestive would apply to, say, sticking a banana or a cat's tail between breasts whereas Innuendo or double_entendre would apply to saying someone has some "nice-tasting nuts". What does everyone else think?
Wiimeiser said:
Actually, sexually_suggestive would apply to, say, sticking a banana or a cat's tail between breasts whereas Innuendo or double_entendre would apply to saying someone has some "nice-tasting nuts". What does everyone else think?
I think innuendo is better as the tag itself is more generalized and still shows that the pool is pointless.
The innuendo tag is aliased to sexually_suggestive.
And anyway, the pool is pointless because it only had a single post despite being a year old.
