Deletion request thread

Done.

Log said:
Done.

Thanks. Sorry for that embarrassing mistake. I learnt my lesson.

post #1052167
Sorry, seems like my upload became a grey box, probably corrupted? And needs to be deleted so to reupload or something. Thanks.

Looks fine to me on both servers.

It looks like this:
http://i44.tinypic.com/of6f49.png
Maybe it's a problem on my side. I'll check again in a while.

Oh right I have samples enabled. The sample's fine but the full version's corrupt, albert or jxh has to purge it.

Oh, do I have to send them a message or will they read this?

pool #4055

Can someone just look through this entire pool and delete some of the posts? I'm pretty sure its evident which posts need to be ax'd and this pool is very much the essence of what's wrong with webcomics.

requesting review for post #1009011

it's part of a pool, so i'm unsure if this is a significant part of story-telling. i didn't see translation notes before that page and there appears to be someone blind. however, it's just highres black.

a similar post #1001050 was deleted before.

S1eth said:
What is the people's opinion on pool #4055.

Personally, I think that the whole pool #4055 deserves to be deleted. The art is poor and the comic is not even interesting or funny.

MyrMindservant said:
Personally, I think that the whole pool #4055 deserves to be deleted. The art is poor and the comic is not even interesting or funny.

Not that people still won't blindly defend it.

There is nothing redeemable about this comic.

A bug prevents these 2 images from being automatically deleted 3 days after being flagged. They require manual deletion.

post #728304
post #993160

I already created a trac ticket (#1346) about this bug 4 days ago.

Has pool #3120 been discussed here? I think its art quality is disastrous and it never managed to amuse me in the slightest. What do the others think?

'Discussed' would be putting it lightly. Search the forums for 'rifyu' if you're curious, but the upshot is that albert likes rifyu, so it stays. Just consider it the price of admission and ignore it as best you can.

Anelaid said:
pool #4055

Can someone just look through this entire pool and delete some of the posts? I'm pretty sure its evident which posts need to be ax'd and this pool is very much the essence of what's wrong with webcomics.

It's been a few days now, so I'm now beginning to go through this pool and flag most of what's not already flagged, and leaving alone a handful of images that may be funny enough to keep...

But I'm wondering if even those should receive the axe, because the quality is just pretty damn bad on all of them.

It'd also be easier if someone who didn't have this flag number limitation just finished the job instead.

Ugh, yeah, this would be better off done by someone who could flag more than 10 images per day. The entire series is what's under scrutiny here but every single image is getting people appealing it for being part of a series - even though this is a 4koma comprised of separate "chapters" and entire chapters are getting flagged at once.

Even more, it's getting people claiming being both poorly drawn and not funny enough to forgive the poor quality are invalid reasons... WHAT, then, is a valid reason? "Poorly drawn" by itself is reason enough.

Nobody is supposed to be able to flag more than 10 images a day. I still don't know how seth did it.

He's magic, I guess?

In that case, I guess this is just going to be a slow process, filled with "part of a pool" appeals the whole way through.

forum #46785

• Privileged users can:
• flag posts with a limit of 10 per day. Contributors and up don't have this limit.

albert must have changed it, when flags were made public it was a hard limit of 10. Really it should have stayed that way because nobody needs to flag more than 10 posts a day. Clogging the mod queue with flagged posts does more harm than good.