pool #4415 - Yoshika-chan (hakosanhanasan)
All images in the pool are EXTREMELY poorly drawn.
(Is there a limit on how many posts I can flag?)
Posted under General
pool #4415 - Yoshika-chan (hakosanhanasan)
All images in the pool are EXTREMELY poorly drawn.
(Is there a limit on how many posts I can flag?)
post #1010293
I thought I already flagged this one, but the "Flag" link is still there.
Very bad anatomy and navel. I can't be the only one who sees this since it has a score of -6.
post #1002814
I think this is pretty bad quality for Danbooru's standard, if the -11 score can support it.
Updated
S1eth said:
pool #4415 - Yoshika-chan (hakosanhanasan)
All images in the pool are EXTREMELY poorly drawn.
(Is there a limit on how many posts I can flag?)
I was actually waiting for them to expire after the 3 days, but now I'm curious to hear the approver's opinion on them, especially this one post #1026735 . Is the "Part of pool approved = whole series approved" mindset overrule even the horrendous art shown here?
I won't refrain from saying that it has arts even worse than pool #3839 , if anything. Its only saving grace is that it has an active translator working on it, perhaps.
pool #4507 - Ex-Soldier Rika's Heart-Throbbing Adventure (working title)
the drawing seems of poor quality. requesting review.
ghostrigger said:
pool #4507 - Ex-Soldier Rika's Heart-Throbbing Adventure (working title)the drawing seems of poor quality. requesting review.
And it's approved by one of those responsible for previously mentioned pool. Why I'm not surprised at all?
That said, given that no one is willing to discuss about them any further, guess it's "Not fix what's not broken"?
Accidentally uploaded a banned artist post
post #1033345. It's in mod queue, but better to delete right away.
Those hands and faces are hideous. Given the artist's previous works, this is not simply a step in the wrong direction but getting knocked off the road entirely.
picnic said:
post #1036340Those hands and faces are hideous. Given the artist's previous works, this is not simply a step in the wrong direction but getting knocked off the road entirely.
More like the uploader failed to tag the artist properly, since the pixiv's link from the artist's previous works don't match up with that one.
======================
EDIT: And while I bothered myself to post this, I would like to voice out that someone keep a watch regarding the currently on-trend series about eyeballs for fishing baits
Like come on, post #1034111 post #1034085 post #1033019 are enough to poke me the wrong way. And I pretty much let out a sigh when I looked at the approver.
Sure, there are good-looking fanarts among the bunch, but is the original itself as depicted in post #1035231 a keeper?
Consider this post as a bump regarding the former two issues discussed as well. If there is no follow-up for them, I'll keep my lips sealed permanently regarding them.
Updated
Hand, arms, faces, the melted bracelet, general lack of quality
Log said:
Send albert a dmail I guess, if a bunch of people do it he can't shrug it off as "oh look log's sperging about nothing again."
Sent a dmail to him regarding those three pools.
picnic said:
post #1037546Hand, arms, faces, the melted bracelet, general lack of quality
Just flag it and see if it's re-approved, I guess.
Hopefully I have it uploaded properly now
I'd like the remove:
post #1047439
and post #1047440 I've uploaded on the grounds of copyrights.
1.
Since we've now got the original pool #4675, pool #4136 can be deleted. See also post #1051244.
2.
What is the people's opinion on pool #4055. Many users seem to hate those because of the subpar drawings and sense of comedy revolving heavily around sex jokes. The images should probably be judged on their individual quality (being 4koma/5koma each with a single joke), but some even reach a score of -8.
S1eth said:
2.
What is the people's opinion on pool #4055. Many users seem to hate those because of the subpar drawings and sense of comedy revolving heavily around sex jokes. The images should probably be judged on their individual quality (being 4koma/5koma each with a single joke), but some even reach a score of -8.
Looks like deletion quality to me.
S1eth said:
2.
What is the people's opinion on pool #4055.
I don't think any of that is worth keeping. Not only because the drawings themselves are bad, but (and I suppose this is more of a personal opinion) they aren't funny to begin with.