ion288 said:
post #6602658
Flag without a tag.
Well, according to this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cg0b7pzO4ng he uses stable difusion as ai-assisted or at leat I undestand that
Posted under General
ion288 said:
post #6602658
Flag without a tag.
Well, according to this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cg0b7pzO4ng he uses stable difusion as ai-assisted or at leat I undestand that
ion288 said:
Thanks kid
post #8550869
Heres an other one.
Well, this sketch exist https://x.com/Ghost1Villager/status/1853094119423553554 so I do not think that is AI-generate and the commentary (according to google translate) says that they drew it
Hi there!
I accidentally uploaded an AI Assisted?? image seen here.
post #8593214
I didn't see their bio when I grabbed the pic which says that he uses a combo of Photoshop and AI.
Eitherway, I wouldn't have uploaded a borderline image had I'd known but cat's out of the bag.
What would be the best call here?
Having doubts.
post #7450484 Dubious flag and no tags.
ion288 said:
post #7450484 Dubious flag and no tags.
I do think they're right and these are at the very least are all AI-Gen heads. For the one you posted there is the braid that disappears into the hair without concluding and post #7461603 the negative version makes it even more obvious the teeth were drawn over it and not by whoever (or whatever) made the rest of the head. Also look at the way post #7311811 has an extra set of fangs and is curling and melting, all of the posts under this artist tag have weird unexplained elements a human artist seemingly wouldn't make.
I guess it's assisted if you count the 20 photoshop filters they put the image through and bits of redrawing but honestly even if the flagger is being nasty they aren't wrong here and I wouldn't call the quality posts.
There's an accusation of post #8610149 and post #8604521
I'm very poor of identifying these, but they seem fine to me? Double checking here because I will approve them otherwise.
argentb said:
There's an accusation of post #8610149 and post #8604521
I'm very poor of identifying these, but they seem fine to me? Double checking here because I will approve them otherwise.
Ditto post #7862777
argentb said:
There's an accusation of post #8610149 and post #8604521
I'm very poor of identifying these, but they seem fine to me? Double checking here because I will approve them otherwise.
The flagger of those posted above, I personally find it suspicious less than 6 months ago their art looked like this amd the new art has an AI looks but besides the arm mentioned above nothing stands out.
argentb said:
There's an accusation of post #8610149 and post #8604521
I'm very poor of identifying these, but they seem fine to me? Double checking here because I will approve them otherwise.
Im calling not AI. Contact me with more evidence and I will reflag it. (First example looks mediocre quality to me but feel free.)
post #8612669 Flagged not tagged.
Updated
https://twitter.com/Ebi_mayopuri/status/1872228059778351179
Her hand, the jpeg artifacts, and the strange artifacts on her face when changing gamma are untrustworthy.
I would like a second opinion since it looks fine otherwise.
I feel this is obviously GenAI. From what I have looked there are issues with Nozomi's cap (which looks like merged with the visor), and Nozomi's hair merging with Hikari's.
Updated
More AI shenanigans from https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts?tags=shexyo&z=2 and it's quizzical why this guy isn't flagged for it; the glaring obtuse mistakes in post #8625515 most evident in the warped dutch angle floor that clearly invades the perspective on the upper right walls and the leg on the bottom left that betrays this same perspective by sinking into the floor instead of laying on it. You can see how desperate this one was pumped out with his prompts that don't involve standing models but hey at least he always has those humidity puffs sprinkled on each and every one of his pics right? Quite the "artist" signature.
That guy has never learned a thing from his tracing days except how to abuse AI beyond the gold fish memory of the general viewing public. Good thing some of us remember.
Updated
Mayhem-Chan said:
There are way too many giveaways, and the two artists you mentionned aren't the only styles getting copied (post #8473740)
Honestly the highly inconsistent yet copied style alone is pretty damning, even more if taken with the context you gave about the twitter account
Looks like the consensus was that all the art was AI, but someone's still uploading more: