Posted under General
Knowledge_Seeker said:
The works by specialhanako are AI, right?
Mentioned it before, but probably. All of their work looks AI-generated and then heavily scaled down and traced into pixel art. The thumbnails give off that vibe, but up close it's hard to see any abnormalities.
The leg position/foot feels so off i'm wondering if it's not AI
Willing to call bullshit, but I can't flag all these in one go, so I'm posting it here for double-checking.
Not sure if AI, or sample watermark causing funky look.
baconmeh2 said:
Not sure if AI, or sample watermark causing funky look.
Can't possibly be AI, look at the date on this post. https://x.com/TheSliceofAnime/status/1462210312476798978/photo/1
But's a terrible quality version of https://www.amazon.co.jp/-/en/NON/dp/B0DKK4NPGZ
Updated
Someone recently uploaded some stuff by Priestofartemis all of their stuff is tagged as AI generated on pixiv. Can a warning that their stuff is AI gen be added to their artist page?
I want to make sure before uploading, since this is coming from an account with nearly no followers https://x.com/byetmac1995/status/1874660685675991124
Updated
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8645489?q=ceres_fauna+
https://x.com/Yuneless/status/1873394076370026963
https://x.com/Yuneless/status/1871238641915461806
Multiple users have stated the user uses AI and traces over it
post #8413448
post #8651491
post #8586049
Flagged, proof was left as an exercise for the reader. I'll reflag if there's some actual proof.
Sorry I found out this is AI edit
MaskedAvenger said:
pixiv #125829461
pixiv #125829361
pixiv #125816918
Having doubts
AI without a doubt, last uploaded post with 6 fingered girl
post #8650765
Tagged ai-generated, but it's being questioned in the comments.
An AI post. See my comment there for further details.
The post is currently in flag timeout.
post #8650662
Flagg linking here so presumably Check AI. No tag.
ion288 said:
post #8650662
Flagg linking here so presumably Check AI. No tag.
The linked forum #327897 mentions JPEG artifacts as a suspicious thing but that just... isn't true? Not sure about the rest though.
ANON_TOKYO said:
The linked forum #327897 mentions JPEG artifacts as a suspicious thing but that just... isn't true? Not sure about the rest though.
The JPEG artifacts looked worse than the average twitter post of similar content, so I thought it was noteworthy
