Posted under Tags
What would you call this kind of expression ? post #8528467
She's looking from above but I don't think it qualifies for a from_below tag, I've put disdain as it's the closest I could find but it feels too strong
I'm not sure about her mouth either
Any second opinion ?
glousk said:
What would you call this kind of expression ? post #8528467
She's looking from above but I don't think it qualifies for a from_below tag, I've put disdain as it's the closest I could find but it feels too strong
I'm not sure about her mouth either
Any second opinion ?
:-/ But there isn't a tag for that, or for :-\ .
Hello. post #8529519
I need some real philosophers here. I've been wanting to post more of this artist's work on here, but a lot of them follow a path that I'm not quite sure how to tag. I want to know if I can tag this as animalization or if I should just stick to tagging these as "pet" instead.. Because this artists works distinctly treat these creatures as animals and not necessarily a kemonomimi type situation. Would I still tag it as kemonomimi mode? I don't know... I want to know what I should tag these creatures physically as so I can efficiently tag the things this artist draws.
Also, I wanna know if I did the character tags right? I tagged Hello Kitty and Pochacco since it seems more like a fusion thing than a cosplay situation, but is that wrong?
gunupmyskirt said:
Hello. post #8529519
I need some real philosophers here. I've been wanting to post more of this artist's work on here, but a lot of them follow a path that I'm not quite sure how to tag. I want to know if I can tag this as animalization or if I should just stick to tagging these as "pet" instead.. Because this artists works distinctly treat these creatures as animals and not necessarily a kemonomimi type situation. Would I still tag it as kemonomimi mode? I don't know... I want to know what I should tag these creatures physically as so I can efficiently tag the things this artist draws.
Also, I wanna know if I did the character tags right? I tagged Hello Kitty and Pochacco since it seems more like a fusion thing than a cosplay situation, but is that wrong?
It's a fusion, yeah. Top half of one character with the bottom half of another. It's not an animal though, so it's not pet or animalization. If it's anything along those lines, it'd be furrification, but I don't think that applies either since the top half is completely human.
AngryZapdos said:
It's a fusion, yeah. Top half of one character with the bottom half of another. It's not an animal though, so it's not pet or animalization. If it's anything along those lines, it'd be furrification, but I don't think that applies either since the top half is completely human.
I don't think it's any closer to furrification.
What i think @gunupmyskirt means is along the lines of how what is normally a human character acting human, is chibi-fied then framed in the art as a tiny "pet" you could play with and carry in your hands, more like one of those tiny friendly creatures you sometimes see in anime?
And if i got it right, then we don't have any tag for this concept that i'm aware of; I added chibi to the tags at least, but i think we still need a new tag
AngryZapdos said:
It's a fusion, yeah. Top half of one character with the bottom half of another. It's not an animal though, so it's not pet or animalization. If it's anything along those lines, it'd be furrification, but I don't think that applies either since the top half is completely human.
The wiki definition for pet is "Either tame animal or a character that is being treated like one", so that's why I used that tag given that they aren't fully animalized but are definitely being portrayed as household pets.
Mayhem-Chan said:
I don't think it's any closer to furrification.
What i think @gunupmyskirt means is along the lines of how what is normally a human character acting human, is chibi-fied then framed in the art as a tiny "pet" you could play with and carry in your hands, more like one of those tiny friendly creatures you sometimes see in anime?
And if i got it right, then we don't have any tag for this concept that i'm aware of; I added chibi to the tags at least, but i think we still need a new tag
This is exactly what I mean. This artist treats the Sanrio versions and plushie versions of these characters like pets. I don't know if having a tag for turning human characters into animal-like pets would be very useful in general, but it'd definitely help for this artist's work in particular.
is she eating baozi?
post #8533268
I know there's a meme going on here as I've seen several ones here and on Twitter, but put meme request because I don't know if it has a name.
post #8535736
Need help identifying this particular fashion style so I can add it to attached post's tags.
MaskedAvenger said:
post #8533268
I know there's a meme going on here as I've seen several ones here and on Twitter, but put meme request because I don't know if it has a name.
Japanese article about the meme: https://note.com/ryukyu_memeclub/n/na2d695b1a4f6
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8538780
The character has moe sleeves, but that isn't an available tag. Is there a different name for this on here?
Freshblink said:
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8538780
The character has moe sleeves, but that isn't an available tag. Is there a different name for this on here?
Tag for watermarks that purposely obstructs view? https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8539964 https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8536033
post #5894839 Is this futanari? I want to remove it, but I want to double check first
xPandaPanda said:
Tag for watermarks that purposely obstructs view? https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8539964 https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8536033
Should be just watermark, unless it's a a grid watermark or if there are multiple.
ziin1234 said:
post #5894839 Is this futanari? I want to remove it, but I want to double check first
It's futa.
c_spl said:
is she eating baozi?
Yes. :-)
hasu_no_kougeki said:
Also oversized_clothes.
