Lobuttomize said:
Sorry, point me to the other upload feedback thread then bro
Just keep in mind: forum #181476
That thread is only for rule-breaking posts.
Updated
Posted under General
Lobuttomize said:
Sorry, point me to the other upload feedback thread then bro
Just keep in mind: forum #181476
That thread is only for rule-breaking posts.
Updated
Laudividni said:
post #4854495
post #4852978
post #4852386I know I wrongly appealed them right after deletion and lost my chance, I don't remember why I did this, but anyway I'd like to have an idea about why they didn't get approved at first.
@Laudividni I wouldn't normally ping a mention will take you directly to this reply post, preventing it from getting lost as this thread is getting flooded.
Two of them were reappoved, which is what I would've done. The second one has some really rough linework. The legs are all over the place and her neck is placed in a weird way.
Veradux said:
Didn't know that existed, can my posts be moved? Also, find it sus that you knew a thread like that exists but still called it "flag brigrading" or something when I posted something that belongs there
Veradux said:
@Laudividni I wouldn't normally ping a mention will take you directly to this reply post, preventing it from getting lost as this thread is getting flooded.
Two of them were reappoved, which is what I would've done. The second one has some really rough linework. The legs are all over the place and her neck is placed in a weird way.
It's ok, I use Event Listener. Someone had already appealed and given me feedback through dmail. You're right, I didn't double check her neck and legs, and thank you, I appreciate it.
I'm curious about post #5117120.
One of the responses for deletion was that an approver "believe[s] it breaks the rules", but I don't see how it does (maybe they thought that the artist's signature was a third-party watermark because it's different than the artist's tag?).
The other reason I thought it might have been deleted was because of the legs of the character on the left, but looking through other images with similar positions, it doesn't really seem off-base.
I'd appreciate any thoughts or advice about this. Thanks.
Edit: Thanks mongirlfan, that makes sense.
Updated
Didn't really understand why post #5119675 was deleted when the parent and sibling posts were fine.
Also could I get some feedback on post #5113782 and post #5099611, especially when the latter's artist has dozens of similar approved posts.
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/5117398
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/5117141
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/5110150
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/5110167
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/5099753
Just curious about why these weren't approved, so I can have an idea about which types to consider uploading, and which to ignore.
Also a query about these ones:
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/5110073
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/5110088
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/5110075
I came to know after uploading them that the artist simply colored them and these are panels from the manga, but looking at the previous entries approved under the artist, that doesn't seem to be a problem for the site. What is it about these three that wasn't good enough?
Flummoxen said:
I'm curious about post #5117120.
One of the responses for deletion was that an approver "believe[
s]it breaks the rules", but I don't see how it does (maybe they thought that the artist's signature was a third-party watermark because it's different than the artist's tag?).The other reason I thought it might have been deleted was because of the legs of the character on the left, but looking through other images with similar positions, it doesn't really seem off-base.
I'd appreciate any thoughts or advice about this. Thanks.
I don't see anything that breaks the rules, the post is perfectly normal in that aspect. The legs aren't much of a problem, but the art in general looks pretty amateurish imo, specially the shading.
razorsharp said:
especially when the latter's artist has dozens of similar approved posts.
It literally does not matter.
I'm tired of explaining this. I'mma just ignore people who use this as justification from now on.
Petrichor said:
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/5117398
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/5110150
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/5110167
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/5099753Just curious about why these weren't approved, so I can have an idea about which types to consider uploading, and which to ignore.
Also a query about these ones:
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/5110073
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/5110088
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/5110075I came to know after uploading them that the artist simply colored them and these are panels from the manga, but looking at the previous entries approved under the artist, that doesn't seem to be a problem for the site. What is it about these three that wasn't good enough?
The first batch is full of poor linework. Cynthia has shelf hips, Indra's got a weird head, etc. etc. They're just veeeery rough.
The second batch:
Third-party edits and colorizations are generally discouraged, so they're looked at with significantly more scrutiny. Not only does it have to be a nigh-perfect panel, but the colorization also needs to be nigh-perfect.
Also you can just do post #5110075. No need to post an entire link.
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/5075470
Unbelievable, how did this not make it? Lol.
The first batch is full of poor linework. Cynthia has shelf hips, Indra's got a weird head, etc. etc. They're just veeeery rough.
The second batch:
Third-party edits and colorizations are generally discouraged, so they're looked at with significantly more scrutiny. Not only does it have to be a nigh-perfect panel, but the colorization also needs to be nigh-perfect.
Understandable, I'll ignore posts which look rough from now on. I'll also keep it in mind to check for third party edits and similar content and ignore them. Thanks.
post #4319595
post #4096745
Is her style considered too western-ish?
And these 2 posts
post #4876037
post #4284043
they exist solely for lewd reasons, but is their quality too bad?
Is it worth appealing any of them?
Petrichor said:
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/5075470
Unbelievable, how did this not make it? Lol.
Many approvers don’t like that kind of western art style.
Btw, please write post #5075470 instead of posting a link.
Oniii-chan said:
post #4319595
post #4096745
Is her style considered too western-ish?
That’s why I skipped the first one, at least. My main reason for skipping the second one was the rough look.
kittey said:
Many approvers don’t like that kind of western art style.
Btw, please write post #5075470 instead of posting a link.
Sorry, I do this from phone so it's much easier to just copy and paste the links.
What's wrong with post #5127827, other than a bit small size?
shrekku45 said:
What's wrong with post #5127827, other than a bit small size?
As cute as it is, it's a very basic sketch.
Hello, can I have some feedback about post #5132417 (NSFW) and why it wasn't approved?
Weirdo01 said:
Hello, can I have some feedback about post #5132417 (NSFW) and why it wasn't approved?
It's an extremely short and boring loop, and the body proportions look really weird.