Posted under General
Acro23 said:
A couple of my uploads got deleted when I posted them (they were selected as child posts using the artists' Twitter as source instead of their pixiv) but the parent posts were approved despite being the exact same image. Could I ask why that's the case?
You uploaded duplicates. We don't need two copies of the same image, so the newer one typically won't be approved.
I'm wondering why post #5766823 wasn't approved, the style is similar to the other images by the same artist and it doesn't have any noticeable flaws as far as I'm aware of.
This post was deleted for the following reason:
Unapproved in three days (about 2 hours ago)
It has been reviewed by 16 approvers. 1 believe it has poor quality. 15 did not like the post enough to approve it.
If you don't understand why your upload was deleted, you can ask for advice in the Upload Feedback Thread on the forum.
Right, since Veradux left the site there is no one answering these anymore. Il have a crack at it but now but it would be good if someone would be willing to do it regularly.
First of all a general explanation. Danbooru strives to be a collection of high quality anime art. Since art quality is subjective we have a system with Approvers that look at images posted by members and if one of them think an image looks good they can approve it. We have about twenty approvers that looks at most images and I dont know how many that only shows up occasionally, some of them doesnt bother clicking the Disinterest button though.
The first guideline for approvers is "you should only approve of posts that you personally like", so sometimes decent quality posts slipps through the system. Its not ideal but its the best system we have been able to come up with.
A few guidelines for uploaders:
Bad anatomy is generally disliked, weird feet or broken back are common answers in this thread.
Porn is less likely to get approved.
This is primarily an anime art site, stuff that looks to "western" can make many approver call "off-topic". Even if it looks way better than the Simpsons.
Some approvers wont approve posts without an online first party source.
Read help:upload rules but dont assume everything not covered by them is OK to post.
Updated
NPEE2003 said:
post #5755552 "It has been reviewed by 11 approvers. 11 did not like the post enough to approve it."
All is good. Not bad anatomy, really?
Porn with excessive cum. Abs looks off.
bastek66 said:
Baron's art look good, they should be approved
post #4155740
post #5756532
post #5756586
1: Weak shading. Her right leg looks off. 2: Long torso. Some of the image is a bit blurry. 3: Foreshortening is hard but her right arm and armpit looks really borked. Also if you just want approvers to look at an image again use the appeal funktion.
skywalkerred said:
why did everyone think post #5760446 wasn't good enough?
There are multiple minor flaws like Phosporas three finger hand, Viridis right breast and the yellow waterfall coming out of nowhere. Viridis hair may also have triggered the anti AI noia going right now.
skywalkerred said:
What's wrong with post #5764707, post #5768883, post #5768898, and post #5768954
1: Angle looks odd, is she leaning forward? Righ hand looks off. Some parts are less detailed than others. 2 and 3: Flat shading, bad hands, shody linework and the "joke" is as flat as the shading. 4: Legs dont seem to fit right. Im not a fan of that face style but could have been approved on a good day.
Vessa said:
Hope I'm doing this right, I'm a bit new here.
post #5766208
post #5766198
post #5766361These got denied and I couldn't quite tell why beyond it not getting a like I think?
I can't quite tell a difference between those and
Is there something I potentially missed that I should've included?
1: Thats not how hipps work in a split. Vessa seems to be missing a leg. Its porn. 2: Big head (even for an anime girl). Rough linework. The extra shading by marker looks bad. 3: I dont know why someone though it deserved a "poor quality" but Vessas head / face looks a bit off. Linework is rather rough and there is some colour bleed.
I obviously cant tell you why post #5766177 was approved but it does have a nice colour gradient and lighting.
Il keep going in a later post.
I had initially uploaded post #5772139 but realized it was not able to be played on mobile, so i converted the file to webm and uploaded the new version. Just not sure why it was approved since it got a fair amount of positive feedback/upvotes.
Pizzastoners said:
1: Shading is a bit flat but this could have gone through. 3: Edalyns hips / groin is broke. The cartoony artstyle probably turned some away.
Sourly said:
post #5768234
post #5768124
Is there a reason for deletion?
The style is very simple and amateurish. Flat shading, uneven linework, no detail.
MrHellstorm17 said:
post #5500605 is in a need of approval
Well you got it but please use the appeal funktion instead of asking here, this is for feedback.
wizardmagican said:
I don't see a huge drop in quality between this post and other approved posts by the same artist
post #5771639
The area where the breast meats the armpit looks wrong and her neck is bent in an unnatural way. An artist having other works approved is no guaranty for approval, I think Il flag some of this artists older work for deletion though.
skywalkerred said:
What's up with post #5773269?
Flat shading, uneven linework and those fingers are to long. Seems like the artist stopped caring after finishing the head.
tangsion said:
Hi, just wondering why post #5772861 is not approved. Is it because a previous version with no source got uploaded (that is also not approved)? Thank you.
This one is harder to comment on, I didnt like the grainy or fuzzy filter (is it a scan?) but I dont think thats what turned off most other approvers. I whish approvers would stop leaving comments like "source?" when they wouldnt approve something if it had one.
recker89 said:
Hi, I'm wondering why post #5773723 was not approved. It took quite some time to tag and is quite popular according to the favorites. Thanks in advance!
Artist failed when drawing Silvervales hipps / leg to torso connection, Veis hipps are also a bit wiffed. Favorites and score are really only a measurement of an images sex appeal, not its quality. Approvers will most always ignore favcount. Its not a terrible image, and tagging gets easier with practice, but having some deletions are normal when you start uploading.
Steelchill said:
I'm wondering why post #5766823 wasn't approved, the style is similar to the other images by the same artist and it doesn't have any noticeable flaws as far as I'm aware of.
Hm, most posts by this artist seems to have bypassed the que, Il put them on my list of things to flag for deletion. The girl lying on stomach has plenty of flaws. Legs, feet, left hand and face. The standing version is better though she has a big head.
Pizzastoners said:
Shes got a bit of a bulging pussy, censor lines looks like teeth. Their bodies are well shaded and detailed but their faces are flat. Girls dont mesh with the 3D background. Not a fan of eyes on top of hair but that may just be me.
Altaraiser said:
This post was deleted for the following reason:
Unapproved in three days (about 2 hours ago)
It has been reviewed by 16 approvers. 1 believe it has poor quality. 15 did not like the post enough to approve it.
If you don't understand why your upload was deleted, you can ask for advice in the Upload Feedback Thread on the forum.
That is how a deletion message reads yes.
Her anatomy is rather dreadful, especially her waist. His navel is some kind of flesh void. Shading is basic. And its porn.
magcolo said:
(sorry if this is not the right place)
I haven't posted them yet but I'm hesitating if these and these will pass the mod queue? Since I found the colors pretty but they have rather simple compositions that might not be interesting enough for most people.
You can ask in the Discord channel if you want preapproval, not really what the forums are used for.
Pizzastoners said:
1: Bad hipps again, dominant girl has some bad breast implants. And its porn, though yuri porn is somewhat more popular with the approvers this did not catch anyones fancy.
2: The linework is rough in places, giving it an unfinished look. The way her breast covers the shoulder looks odd to me, I suspect the AI scare makes approvers extra cautious about stuff like that. This one could have gone through IMO.
asianmikepwn said:
I had initially uploaded post #5772139 but realized it was not able to be played on mobile, so i converted the file to webm and uploaded the new version. Just not sure why it was approved since it got a fair amount of positive feedback/upvotes.
The mosaic cock moving in the mosaic pussy looks weird. This image gained nothing from being animated.
ion288 said:
Hm, most posts by this artist seems to have bypassed the que, Il put them on my list of things to flag for deletion. The girl lying on stomach has plenty of flaws. Legs, feet, left hand and face. The standing version is better though she has a big head.
I don't really understand your reasoning for saying their are flaws nor do I understand queuing the rest of his art for deletion despite the artist's prior work being up on danbooru for years.
Hi, these posts (post #5780993 and post #5781370) were not approved even though they are a continuation of this approved post post #5647925
Steelchill said:
I don't really understand your reasoning for saying their are flaws nor do I understand queuing the rest of his art for deletion despite the artist's prior work being up on danbooru for years.
You asked for feedback why post #5766823 was deleted. I tried pointing out that the left Syoko has poorly drawn legs and feet and also her head size, face and hands could be considered flaws.
You said it was similar to the artists other works and I agree, some of the artists other images does not meet Danbooru quality standards in my opinion so I will flag them for review. Its not automatic deletion, the other approvers may reapprove them if they like.
Esp007 said:
Hi, these posts (post #5780993 and post #5781370) were not approved even though they are a continuation of this approved post post #5647925
First of all you did not parent or pool those posts so they were judged individually. I also dont really see how post #5781370 is a continuation unless there is a scene where she changes clothes and pierces her nipple.
As I stated above, approvers generally want higher quality once something becomes pure porn. post #5780993 has some odd anatomy around her waist, his hipps and It seems to me that they are taking up the same space. post #5781370 is trickier, probably the vulgarity and the somewhat flat shading and low detailing in places. I admit I would not have approved post #5647925, so explaining why one was approved but not the others is hard.
This post was deleted for the following reason:
Unapproved in three days (4 days ago)
It has been reviewed by 14 approvers. 14 did not like the post enough to approve it.
If you don't understand why your upload was deleted, you can ask for advice in the Upload Feedback Thread on the forum.
Regarding post #5781325 that depicts Kagamine Rin aiming a gun, a fanart that has a relation to Shibuya Catastrophe song. I bet it was deleted because the lighting is just really bad, or too bright (?)
Meanwhile I saw this post #4008232 which depicts higher exposure on face compared to that, and it was approved. What I posted even have finer details.
Blutrache said:
Regarding post #5781325 that depicts Kagamine Rin aiming a gun, a fanart that has a relation to Shibuya Catastrophe song. I bet it was deleted because the lighting is just really bad, or too bright (?)
For me it's the arms, they appear to be too short. Especially the one on the left.
Why? What wrong for these post? It's look good really?
post #5755552
post #5791125
post #5791129
post #5791131
post #5791135
post #5791250
post #5791257
post #5791312
post #5795885
post #5795884
Updated
This post was deleted for the following reason:
Unapproved in three days (5 minutes ago)
It has been reviewed by 17 approvers. 17 did not like the post enough to approve it.
If you don't understand why your upload was deleted, you can ask for advice in the Upload Feedback Thread on the forum
Regarding post #5792197. I'm sure that the girl is not even Tateyama Ayano, her eyes are way bluish and wears different uniform. I personally don't think this sketch is that bad, it's quite nicely-detailed. You deleted it because something wrong with her hand position, or just because of detected JPEG artifacts?
Updated
