Donmai

AI-generated art check thread

Posted under General

Diet Soda

Nell said:

post #7024862 - I'm not familiar with the models, but one of the 'default' ones produces belly shading exactly like that. Overall the image looks AI-generated from the thumbnail, but at full resolution nothing else about it stands out as an artifact of that. So I wonder if the artist drew over an AI-generation to the point that they ultimately left nothing of the original generation in the final image.

Don't see any AI artefacts and the artist's work looks pretty consistent throughout the years, so even if it is assisted it can't be of any degree that matters.

岩戸鈴芽 said:

Most if not all of chrisdasa.

Stuff like post #6904583 looks like it's just AI.

Looks like another case of an artist who used to draw by hand giving up and switching over to AI with minimal edits, some of those are pretty egregious like the chest harness dropping out of existence under her hand in post #7038577

FivePastNever said:

I'm curious about this one, since it's from a very small account with barely any prior activity.

https://x.com/a17623363801/status/1789191601685962871

Yeah, that's a full stop AI mess.

Reply
TrueKringe

post #7587956

I uploaded this image and it got deleted. Tbh I was 70/30 sure that it was human works, tho I think the blurry image combined with some odd details on her feet kinda makes one of the approver flagged this as "breaking the rules".

A quick check on artist's Pixiv account shows that this artist's other works has too much of details that AI wouldn't be able to replicate, yet the blurriness of their work kinda throwing off my sence a bit. Would need a second opinion for that.

Reply
Knowledge Seeker

santander said:

@Knowledge_Seeker what do you think?

The things you are pointing out look like the sort of things any artist can fuck up in this case, especially with how consistent it looks. Also, notice how the hair is casting a consistent shadow and the details on the flowers. AI can't do those things very well. I think it's safe to say this is not AI. So please let this go.

Also, don't ping me. I don't like being pinged unless I absolutely have to be. Bring it up in my DMs next time.

Reply
santander

Knowledge_Seeker said:

The things you are pointing out look like the sort of things any artist can fuck up in this case, especially with how consistent it looks. Also, notice how the hair is casting a consistent shadow and the details on the flowers. AI can't do those things very well. I think it's safe to say this is not AI. So please let this go.

Also, don't ping me. I don't like being pinged for matters I'd personally consider not forum worthy. Bring it up in my DMs next time.

The melted parts of the kimono on the right dont look a human mistake to me. And the pattern doesent look consistent at all.

https://files.catbox.moe/jicedz.jpg
https://files.catbox.moe/nzvivd.jpg
https://files.catbox.moe/3j2msd.jpg

Why would this be DM worthy but not worthy to talk about on the forum its intended for?

Reply
Knowledge Seeker

santander said:

The melted parts of the kimono on the right dont look a human mistake to me. And the pattern doesent look consistent at all.

https://files.catbox.moe/jicedz.jpg
https://files.catbox.moe/nzvivd.jpg
https://files.catbox.moe/3j2msd.jpg

You can also see brush strokes. Also, this is an artist who has been drawing for years by this point, and I'm not seeing any noticeable style shifts or whatnot since AI came out from them. If this were AI, you'd be able to find something wrong with just about everything else this far zoomed in. It's more than likely some kind of fuck up that can occur when coloring, especially at these parts you are showing me.

Why would this be DM worthy but not worthy to talk about on the forum its intended for?

Because I simply do not like being randomly summoned for things. Especially when it just results in an argument I have no desire to partake in.

Reply
1 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88