Does anyone else get the feeling that this one is AI-assisted, or is it just me? The hair on her right eyebrow (left for us) and her shoelace just look very AI
Doesn't look AI to me. I'm more concerned with the original artist tag though (user_dvgc8787).
Doesn't look AI to me. I'm more concerned with the original artist tag though (user_dvgc8787).
No, it's almost certainly a heavy cleaned AI gen. Zoom in on the eyes and you can see the harsh editing lines of them reshaping with a default eraser/pen in gimp or photoshop. And the jank ass scarf "tassels".
It's the most egregious, but you can see similar minor edits in all their works. It's like someone did some competent AI gens, some fairly decent edits, and then someone else did a few amatuer edits.
No, it's almost certainly a heavy cleaned AI gen. Zoom in on the eyes and you can see the harsh editing lines of them reshaping with a default eraser/pen in gimp or photoshop. And the jank ass scarf "tassels".
It's the most egregious, but you can see similar minor edits in all their works. It's like someone did some competent AI gens, some fairly decent edits, and then someone else did a few amatuer edits.
Alright. I trust you. But my point with the artist tag still stands.
This forum topic doesn't serve the purpose to start witch hunting artists. So, don't accuse artists for Ai-Gen, if you don't provide any evidence or other proof, as evazion said. Use this topic to ask for specific images and not to accuse anyone of anything.
evazion said:
Be careful about saying something is AI without concrete evidence. I've seen more than one artist on Twitter get very offended at their work being falsely called AI by people saying all the minor flaws in their work are proof of AI.
I can't explain but I have a feeling, so I just pointed on that and hoped someone more qualified could notice something
"Full of AI recently" is a direct accusation. If you have no valid reason backing up these claims then you need to stop posting here whining about it. Half your posts here are just bitching about your failed flags on AI-assisted (including one where you told others to reflag it, which is against the rules) and your thread to get AI-assisted banned was already shot down by an admin. Get over it and accept there will be things here you don't like, or go elsewhere.
"Full of AI recently" is a direct accusation. If you have no valid reason backing up these claims then you need to stop posting here whining about it. Half your posts here are just bitching about your failed flags on AI-assisted (including one where you told others to reflag it, which is against the rules) and your thread to get AI-assisted banned was already shot down by an admin. Get over it and accept there will be things here you don't like, or go elsewhere.
Yes, I understood it and repost it with "post number AI?" and won't "accuse" someone without clear evidence anymore, sheesh what a writer you are... chill, dude "AI-assisted" defenition is not clear, so don't be proud about "your failed flags", it happens. I see something is AI - I flag it (especially when there's no "AI-assisted" tag) if you agree you delete that post, if not you reject a flag. I don't see any problems here
Yes, I understood it and repost it with "post number AI?" and won't "accuse" someone without clear evidence anymore, sheesh what a writer you are... chill, dude "AI-assisted" defenition is not clear, so don't be proud about "your failed flags", it happens. I see something is AI - I flag it (especially when there's no "AI-assisted" tag) if you agree you delete that post, if not you reject a flag. I don't see any problems here
here's a good example, someone flagged it saying "looks AI" - no proof, no pointings on suspicious parts - it's okay.
Exactly what I'm talking about, if you see something's wrong you should at least point at it so someone with more IQ can do a resesearch or something. My only mistake is that I pointed at it in maybe an aggressive form, that's a sorry from me, won't happen again.
Artist tagged their old posts with AI-gen and then suddenly stopped. Hair area is extremely bad with malformed hair vents and sidelocks popping up out of nowhere, and a ponytail somehow running under a choker... Going to go out on a limb and say they're doing nothing but AI-gen.
Besides the extra fingers, many basic mistakes like disappearing armlets, bracelets merging into wrists, crown merged into hair, broken necklace, smudged eyes, etc. This one is not very subtle.
Artist tagged their old posts with AI-gen and then suddenly stopped. Hair area is extremely bad with malformed hair vents and sidelocks popping up out of nowhere, and a ponytail somehow running under a choker... Going to go out on a limb and say they're doing nothing but AI-gen.
Yeah, you don't learn to actually edit/ mix ai with your own artistic skills this quickly rofl. People who pretend like they're putting '' hard work '' into it and are actually doing a lot of it themselves are full of shit.
I really wish people would stop lying about it, I dunno how they don't feel embarrassed pretending like they're putting in a ton of effort or have any artistic skills of their own. Like even when caught people still refuse to tag things properly it's a big problem, especially on sites like Deviantart people should just get permabanned if they refuse to tag it and even admit to it.
The guy in question even has a banner on Twitter of the generic stable diffusion style, it's clear he just stole someones art and made a model out of it...
I really wish people would stop lying about it, I dunno how they don't feel embarrassed pretending like they're putting in a ton of effort or have any artistic skills of their own.
Will never happen, unfortunately. Sportsmen use steroids and all that stuff pretending they're are strong and all... sad.