Donmai

AI-generated art check thread

Posted under General

Mayhem-Chan

Marlor said:

https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6135857?q=yan_kodiac - seems like default AI

background may be AI but i see lots of manually drawn stuff on the focus character, and the hands themselves definitely have human-made errors rather than AI ones

Marlor said:

https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6124729?q=suuru+ - what about this one, three latest works has nothing to do with his previous human skills? This is defenetely AI-gen, but animated, lol.

100%, it is glaring, style and skill change is way too abrupt, no human artist can go directly from a relatively lesser quality on still images to a realistic-grade rendering on animations, doesnt help that makima here really does have the exact same look she had on other AI-generated stuff

Reply
Kaede Ono

TrueKringe said:

post #6141489

I'm suspecting that this is AI-generated due to artefacts here and there (especially at the mouth). Also, a quick look at the Pixiv account shows that the "artist's" style is very inconsistent and often comes with some giveaway for the art to be ai-generated.

Not sure if AI-generated or assisted, but the toes feel like a dead giveaway for me.

Reply
Marlor

TrueKringe said:

post #6141489

I'm suspecting that this is AI-generated due to artefacts here and there (especially at the mouth). Also, a quick look at the Pixiv account shows that the "artist's" style is very inconsistent and often comes with some giveaway for the art to be ai-generated.

AI without a single question.

Reply
Throwaway9999

https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6142812?q=ai-generated+status%3Adeleted

The image was obviously deleted but I do admire the mission statement behind it.

AI Images are NOT protected by copyright. Therefore, they are free to use, share and download. They fall under free use. Therefore, it is also impossible to DMCA or strike someone reposting someone elses AI art.
If you want to rebel against AI Art, then just repost AI art yourself. You CANNOT be legally charged for doing so.
If you want to take measures against AI art, use this loophole, and repost it yourself. At some point, imageboards will have to address the issue of the flood of AI art and duplicates. There is no "owner" behind AI art, so it doesn't matter who posted first.

Godspeed Batman or the Robin Hood of Generated Art. Confront techbros by using their own weapon against themselves.

Updated

Reply
feline lump

Jerrpanese said:

https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/106181706

The artstyle looks very different compared to their drawings before and after this one, yet looking very carefully at it I cannot spot any notable screw-ups from the AI. At worst, it can be AI-assisted.

Eyebrows are broken, merging with the bangs, and creating a nonsense line cutting across them. Sidelock on the right is similarly mangled. Bed frame fades into nothing when hitting a strand of hair. Hair and foot both appear to merge with the bedsheets on the right. These uncorrected screw-ups by the AI would put it below the threshold for a high-quality AI-assisted work, IMO (and I would personally question whether it's even retouched at all).

Reply
AccipiterPC

there is this online tool to help everyone identify AI frauds too:
https://thehive.ai/demos?case_study=ai_generated_image_detection

or if you don't trust my link (which is fair i guess), you can google it, it's called
" Cloud-Based AI Solutions for Understanding Content | Hive " on search results.
then on the site, click "AI Models" , "AI generated media recognition", and then "try the demo".

you can upload the image with "upload media" on bottom left. it's free.

i played around with it for a bit and found it to be 95%+ accurate.
on a test i did with around 25 images i only found only one error of each (one image wrongly identified as AI and one other image wrongly identified as non-AI).

HOWEVER, false positive and false negative results exist. so of course don't use it as your sole judgment to decide if it's surely AI or not.
basically, it just gives you another clue and tool (a big one) for when you're not sure.

on a sidenote, to be extra safe, please also make sure you always delete from the site's database the image you uploaded after checking the results.(there is a small transparant cross on the top right of each image you upload to remove them from the site).

Reply
einhyr arjun

AccipiterPC said:

there is this online tool to help everyone identify AI frauds too:
https://thehive.ai/demos?case_study=ai_generated_image_detection

or if you don't trust my link (which is fair i guess), you can google it, it's called
" Cloud-Based AI Solutions for Understanding Content | Hive " on search results.
then on the site, click "AI Models" , "AI generated media recognition", and then "try the demo".

you can upload the image with "upload media" on bottom left. it's free.

i played around with it for a bit and found it to be 95%+ accurate.
on a test i did with around 25 images i only found only one error of each (one image wrongly identified as AI and one other image wrongly identified as non-AI).

HOWEVER, false positive and false negative results exist. so of course don't use it as your sole judgment to decide if it's surely AI or not.
basically, it just gives you another clue and tool (a big one) for when you're not sure.

on a sidenote, to be extra safe, please also make sure you always delete from the site's database the image you uploaded after checking the results.(there is a small transparant cross on the top right of each image you upload to remove them from the site).

I second this. I've tested this tool before using 50 images, half of them are AI-generated from AI-booru and Pixiv, the others are made by humans. Found only 2 cases of false positives and one false negative.

Reply
1 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 132