Nacha said:
Not sure about some of the older stuff but the recent 10-15 pics definitely don't look right, classic AI sheen, weird hashtag usage, etc.
Posted under General
Nacha said:
Not sure about some of the older stuff but the recent 10-15 pics definitely don't look right, classic AI sheen, weird hashtag usage, etc.
John_Hopfield said:
The character looks drawn to me.
The background is definitely weird, but I'm not seeing clear signs of AI. Maybe an upscaled stock image or something.
post #6590042 from the same artist has a similarly artifacted background, but pretty sure it isn't AI because of the clear text (and the characters again look hand-drawn but separate from the background).
Their pixiv doesn't look suspicious either. I think this is a real artist, that just pastes in backgrounds sometimes.
Hereinafter said:
Looks like retouched AI, the butt melting is a strange way to depict sweat. But I can't be sure.
AniLive recently came out with a statement saying that their recent VTuber models for their Jumpstart Program volume 2 were done by human artists without naming anyone involved, as the models used were likely generated by AI without any proof that they were drawn by humans.
They put this picture of two models yet to debut into the statement, which I think is likely AI.
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8387088?q=poketball this dude strikes again and this time it's default AI pose and weird hands, white background is not white if you play with contrast, also broken ass
Marlor said:
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8387088?q=poketball this dude strikes again and this time it's default AI pose and weird hands, white background is not white if you play with contrast, also broken ass
I don't know about the things you mentioned, but the ornament above her forehead and the pinky toe on her right foot point to it almost certainly being ai-generated.
Never mind, ignore what I posted, the artist is legit.
Freshblink said:
Never mind, ignore what I posted, the artist is legit.
May I ask how you know that?
Post I made was asking about https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8366614?q=souryuu_asuka_langley+
I edited it out since it turns out the artist is legit.
I am not talking about my previous post, I am pretty convinced the blue archive one is AI assisted at least.
post #8347579 and post #8245798Been a while but here is a flag without tag situation again. Thanks.
Updated
This page on IOPWiki suggests that the following posts have utilized AI somehow:
post #6902330
post #6902341
post #6902348
post #6902316
post #6902325
IOPWiki said:
Unless specified otherwise, CG files which are NOT specifically listed here in the "General Info" section, are not under any suspicion of AI Assisted usage, and that those CG files were drawn with the illustrators own capabilities.Suspected AI Usage:
post #8394683
Doubt this artist's works are legit, but it would be worth a check.
Juger said:
post #8394683
Doubt this artist's works are legit, but it would be worth a check.
His twitter bio says stable diffusion, overall profile seems like typical ai factory
someone just posted another post #8396737 from the same AI generator that Juger posted about.
This artist just popped up a year ago with a bunch of very AI looking images. Hardly any style progression and some wildly inconsistent artstyles at the start.
https://twitter.com/routanakata/status/1852700724175720813
Didn't find anything on the artist's profile, but lack of a tag here and most twitter posts being retweets with hardly any original art seem like red flags.
BaiserLaVerite said:
https://twitter.com/routanakata/status/1852700724175720813
Didn't find anything on the artist's profile, but lack of a tag here and most twitter posts being retweets with hardly any original art seem like red flags.
Their style is a little strange looking, but I see 0 AI red flags.
post #8401697 accused of being AI by an approver, though for once not flagged ☺
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}