Posted under Tags
Mayhem-Chan said:
But then i don't understand why you said crop tops can't be strapless
crop tops can't be strapless because that would be a tube top. and if tube tops aren't tight enough on the bottom to the waist, then it goes back to strapless shirt.
Updated by DanbooruBot
bob14234657 said:
crop tops can't be strapless because that would be a tube top. and if tube tops aren't tight enough on the bottom to the waist, then it goes back to strapless shirt.
Not necessarily, you can even read the tube top wiki essentially saying it can cover the entire torso just as much as it can be the length of a crop top, there's an obvious and significant area of overlap naturally but that's it.Also if crop tops couldnt be strapless because of the reason you gave, then crop top overhang wouldn't exist
edit: forgot it also included non-strapless shirts brainfart
Updated by DanbooruBot
Mayhem-Chan said:
Not necessarily, you can even read the tube top wiki essentially saying it can cover the entire torso just as much as it can be the length of a crop top, there's an obvious and significant area of overlap naturally but that's it.
Also if crop tops couldnt be strapless because of the reason you gave, then crop top overhang wouldn't exist
okay this is getting off-topic, feel free to dmail me or dm me on discord at Sekai#5543
Updated by DanbooruBot
Is there a tag for art that’s not yet flat color but lacks highlights? Or can I put it in flat color?
Updated by DanbooruBot
magcolo said:
Is there a tag for art that no yet flat color but lacks highlights? Or can I put it in flat color?
definitely doesn't apply to flat color but maybe there should be a tag for matte style colors?
Updated by DanbooruBot
post #4450981
Isn’t it just solo?
At first I thought there were two girls in this post because of the reflection in the mirror, but it was a painting.
Updated by DanbooruBot
AkaringoP said:
post #4450981
Isn’t it just solo?
At first I thought there were two girls in this post because of the reflection in the mirror, but it was a painting.
the actual amount of space the girl takes up in the image is probably only a sixth, so solo seems fine. there are plenty of examples like post #5682279 and post #5722445 that do the same.
Updated by DanbooruBot
bob14234657 said:
the actual amount of space the girl takes up in the image is probably only a sixth, so solo seems fine. there are plenty of examples like post #5682279 and post #5722445 that do the same.
This is similar to what we've been talking about on discord.
https://discord.com/channels/310432830138089472/310833975079993350/1101297720255320177
Updated by DanbooruBot
AkaringoP said:
This is similar to what we've been talking about on discord.
https://discord.com/channels/310432830138089472/310833975079993350/1101297720255320177
No idea what you’ve been talking about, but it was tagged 1girl + multiple_girls when I came across it and I didn’t want to ponder about it for more than 5 minutes. :P
Updated by DanbooruBot
AkaringoP said:
post #4450981
Isn’t it just solo?
At first I thought there were two girls in this post because of the reflection in the mirror, but it was a painting.
It doesn’t look like a painting though, you can see the reflection of the front girl’s hair.
Updated by DanbooruBot
Does official art really belong in the canon pool? Seems like they'd be canon by default.
Or should I just remove the ones that are already there?
Updated by DanbooruBot
post #6266034: Is there a tag for the star emitted by a wink, so to say? It could almost be spoken star but I think this is a separate trope that's not too uncommon.
Edit: Created wink star. Not a great name but I couldn't think of a better one.
Updated by DanbooruBot
Super_Affection said:
post #6266034: Is there a tag for the star emitted by a wink, so to say? It could almost be spoken star but I think this is a separate trope that's not too uncommon.
I don't think there's a tag for it yet, but I wouldn't be opposed to having one.
Is this gothic?
Updated by DanbooruBot
The_Bob said:
I don't think there's a tag for it yet, but I wouldn't be opposed to having one.
Is this gothic?
Yes, added it with kimono
Updated by DanbooruBot
kittey said:
post #6041218 - Is this a yu-gi-oh! reference?
They are playing M.I.W's Phantom Magic Vision (aka.VISION: Phantom Magic).
Updated by DanbooruBot
henmere said:
They are playing M.I.W's Phantom Magic Vision (aka.VISION: Phantom Magic).
Yes, but are the poses and/or card placements a yu-gi-oh! reference?
Updated by DanbooruBot
Sorry if this has been resolved before, but what would be the correct commentary-related tag for posts like post #6259771, with only Twitter hashtags in the commentary? I've seen some posts where the hashtags were translated (post #5871313) and posts where they weren't (post #5131767), both tagged with commentary, so I don't know whether it should or shoudn't be tagged commentary (or if hashtags should be translated at all for that matter).
Updated by DanbooruBot
薄紅 said:
Sorry if this has been resolved before, but what would be the correct commentary-related tag for posts like post #6259771, with only Twitter hashtags in the commentary? I've seen some posts where the hashtags were translated (post #5871313) and posts where they weren't (post #5131767), both tagged with commentary, so I don't know whether it should or shoudn't be tagged commentary (or if hashtags should be translated at all for that matter).
Hashtags are often redundant with our copyright and character tags. If that's all that's in the commentary it shouldn't get any commentary tags IMO. Translating it might be helpful to someone who can't recognize them as such but just doesn't feel worth the trouble most of the time.
post #6259771 hashtags are just oshi no ko and hoshino ai (oshi no ko) so it shouldn't get any commentary tags and it doesn't really need translation.
post #5871313 translating the hashtag feels more valuable to me since it's actually meaningful and not redundant with Danbooru's tagging. There's also text commentary in addition to the hashtag so it would get the commentary tag anyway. If the tag were the only commentary I don't think I would tag it as commentary but I wouldn't argue if you did.
post #5131767 hashtags are not useful but there's commentary apart from the hashtags so the commentary tag is appropriate anyway. Translating the hashtags there would result in "#Arknights #Arknights #Arknights" which might be why it wasn't done.
Personally if I translate a commentary with redundant copy/char hashtags in addition to actual commentary I usually just leave out the hashtags in the translated version.
Updated by DanbooruBot
薄紅 said:
Sorry if this has been resolved before, but what would be the correct commentary-related tag for posts like post #6259771, with only Twitter hashtags in the commentary? I've seen some posts where the hashtags were translated (post #5871313) and posts where they weren't (post #5131767), both tagged with commentary, so I don't know whether it should or shoudn't be tagged commentary (or if hashtags should be translated at all for that matter).
If a commentary is made solely by hashtags, it doesn't need any commentary metatag.
I translate hashtags and add commentary to posts I see, even if it turns out as something like "#Arknights #Arknights #Arknights" though, it doesn't bother me, some of them have meaning and I don't expect everyone to know basic Japanese or whatever, it also helps me to filter them out of searches.
Updated by DanbooruBot
