How do I tag this?

magcolo said:

The artist tagged U149 on pixiv

That's not a reason for tagging.
If an artist tags futanari, are you going to add it?

post #6277873

Is there a commentary tag for ascii?

SolRush said:

post #6277873

Is there a commentary tag for ascii?

twitter rabbit ears (meme) for this specific example

SolRush said:

post #6277873

Is there a commentary tag for ascii?

I think they just fall under symbol-only commentary.

AkaringoP said:

That's not a reason for tagging.
If an artist tags futanari, are you going to add it?

I’m not justifying for the tag, but that’s likely the reason why it ended up on that post. You can start investing there, or just DM the tagger, asking here won’t bring anything most of the time.

I don't expect answers, but better to ask the way than go astray.

I've been cleaning artist mistags, reposter, cm and brand arttags for a while. My goal was to correct mistags, find dupes, prevent different artists from being merged, keep track of group accounts and to encourage people who check edits to properly tag artists. A considerablr amount of posts I found were tagged by mistake and by copying tags from similar posts without removing the original arttag. Now that my saved search is down some pages, filled with shared accounts and circles with hard to identify individuals, I have 3 questions:

Individual said:

post #6267850

Any tag to describe the illust on the computer screen?

Asking this again, other examples are Gustave Dore's artworks. The best I could think alone was tagging photo inset and removing it from my search.

post #6250681
Should I keep group arttags on posts with original characters like this, working as some sort of copytag?

Last, am I missing any useful tags?

post #6279088
Is there a name for this hand gesture, or does it fall under heart hands? (Or finger heart: post #6276937)

I several questions regarding how tags should be used.

• Do you think the tag flashlight should also apply to gun attachments that serve purpose as such? Maybe by slightly altering the tag's Wiki. Such as on post #6279135
• Can *-tinted_eyewear still apply to goggles?
• Should epaulettes also be used for those without fringe trim that are usually smaller? Based on image web search, they look such (e.g. post #5954568) and also known as shoulderboard that are commonly found on military uniforms.

Thank you and will appreciate any feedback, despite no answers at all until now.

薄紅 said:

post #6279088
Is there a name for this hand gesture, or does it fall under heart hands? (Or finger heart: post #6276937)

It’s heart hands, finger heart is a mistag. Btw, there was a previous discussion that talked about giving distinct heart hands styles sub tags, but I haven’t got to do it yet.

———
post #4643664

Is this invisible chair or faux figurine? There's a tiny amount of sand under her.

post #5508829

Does this count as faux figurine?

post #6279272

Is there a tag for this "hands under chin" idol-type pose?

how do I tag the horns and the 'gore part' of post #6280026 ?

Wolf_of_Gubbio said:

how do I tag the horns and the 'gore part' of post #6280026 ?

Those are antlers, not sure if it warrants guro.

Wolf_of_Gubbio said:

how do I tag the horns and the 'gore part' of post #6280026 ?

wendigos have deer antlers. and assuming you mean the arm, that would be severed limb (but not guro, like magcolo said).

The_Bob said:

post #6279272

Is there a tag for this "hands under chin" idol-type pose?

hands on own chin, can be used for palms facing up/down.

post #6280863
There's flipped hair for when it curves outwards but what is it called when it curls inwards like that?

post #6282277
Is there a name for this kind of squatting-over-other-person pose? It initially looked like a shoulder carry but neither is supporting the other's weight.

post #6189788

Is there a tag for only coloring within a frame? Kinda like double exposure.

magcolo said:

post #6189788

Is there a tag for only coloring within a frame? Kinda like double exposure.

It would fit for the frame_within_frame tag proposed in topic #22910. I'd say partially_colored also applies.

Should post tagged imminent_bestiality like post #5987799 be or not be tagged bestiality?

If I treat it like imminent_penetration and sex, those situation shouldn't be tagged both since there's no visible vaginal or anal going on right? I assume that, if both tags are to be used at the same time to ease searching using bestiality only, it would kind of make imminent_bestiality redundant ("bestiality imminent_penetration" would be sufficient) so logically, I wouldn't tag both at the same time, unless I should for those then I'm sorta questioning the tag's purpose. I tried to do a few searches using my two tags limit and couldn't find a situation where "bestiality imminent_penetration" wouldn't be applicable to imminent_bestiality situations.

Bit of a side note, imminent_bestiality seems to be used a bit more liberally than imminent_penetration, so I'm wondering if I should clean the tag up a little or leave it as is (more for the intention/fetish than applying identically to imminent_penetration. bestiality also defines itself as "A humanoid having sex(vaginal or anal required if I undertand correctly) with an animal, creature, monster, or any other non-humanoid partner." and seems to be more for the intention than the wiki definition). For both tag, I feel like rather keeping it figurative than literal (penis about to enter/sex act with animal), I'm pretty sure people searching bestiality also look for things like post #5882384, might be the same for imminent_bestiality and looking for illustrations similar to post #6040137.

Just realised I spent over an hour thinking over and writing that forum post without considering imminent_bestiality may not equal imminent_penetration, though I think most of my queries still stand.

skb044 said:

Should post tagged imminent_bestiality like post #5987799 be or not be tagged bestiality?

If I treat it like imminent_penetration and sex, those situation shouldn't be tagged both since there's no visible vaginal or anal going on right? I assume that, if both tags are to be used at the same time to ease searching using bestiality only, it would kind of make imminent_bestiality redundant ("bestiality imminent_penetration" would be sufficient) so logically, I wouldn't tag both at the same time, unless I should for those then I'm sorta questioning the tag's purpose. I tried to do a few searches using my two tags limit and couldn't find a situation where "bestiality imminent_penetration" wouldn't be applicable to imminent_bestiality situations.

Bit of a side note, imminent_bestiality seems to be used a bit more liberally than imminent_penetration, so I'm wondering if I should clean the tag up a little or leave it as is (more for the intention/fetish than applying identically to imminent_penetration. bestiality also defines itself as "A humanoid having sex(vaginal or anal required if I undertand correctly) with an animal, creature, monster, or any other non-humanoid partner." and seems to be more for the intention than the wiki definition). For both tag, I feel like rather keeping it figurative than literal (penis about to enter/sex act with animal), I'm pretty sure people searching bestiality also look for things like post #5882384, might be the same for imminent_bestiality and looking for illustrations similar to post #6040137.

Just realised I spent over an hour thinking over and writing that forum post without considering imminent_bestiality may not equal imminent_penetration, though I think most of my queries still stand.

I'd say bestiality should be tagged on it, in part for blacklist reasons, and for tag size reasons