Donmai

How do I tag this?

Posted under Tags

John Fantasy XIV

skb044 said:
Just realised I spent over an hour thinking over and writing that forum post without considering imminent_bestiality may not equal imminent_penetration, though I think most of my queries still stand.

it does, at least as of right now. imminent bestiality sounds (and looks) a whole lot like "imminent penetration/imminent cunnilingus by an animal", which isn't useful when you can just search imminent_* bestiality or similar. things like post #6040137 or post #5702085 seem circumstantial -- which is not what imminent_* tags are for -- and were probably only added to denote the animal part. bestiality is not applicable because the action is not ongoing, but for the blacklist, maybe imminent bestiality is valid with "naked girl near animal suggestively" cases so people have an easy blacklist for both active dog sex and soon-to-be active dog sex. the name of course clashes with other imminent tags but I can't think of a better one atm.

Updated by DanbooruBot

Reply
John Fantasy XIV

Marlor said:

Is it a tag question? How to tag it so the original will be shown in parent post?https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6241736?q=koahri+
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/3639674?q=parent%3A3639674

parenting priority is not normally decided based on age, but rather if it's the "best" version of the image. post #3639674 is the parent because it's a higher resolution and the child is censored. other cases like comics or variant sets are given priority based on chronological order. for example, the first page of a comic should always be the parent and the same is true for the "default" version of a variant set. you can also parent for revisions and derivative works.

if you want to parent something, first copy the parent image's post id and add "parent:[id]" into the child's tags. it will go through automatically.

edit: kek it showed both images the op linked as the same post

Updated by DanbooruBot

Reply
skb044

BobTheBuilder_v1 said:

it does, at least as of right now. imminent bestiality sounds (and looks) a whole lot like "imminent penetration/imminent cunnilingus by an animal", which isn't useful when you can just search imminent_* bestiality or similar. things like post #6040137 or post #5702085 seem circumstantial -- which is not what imminent_* tags are for -- and were probably only added to denote the animal part. bestiality is not applicable because the action is not ongoing, but for the blacklist, maybe imminent bestiality is valid with "naked girl near animal suggestively" cases so people have an easy blacklist for both active dog sex and soon-to-be active dog sex. the name of course clashes with other imminent tags but I can't think of a better one atm.

Should I rollback liberally dual tagging imminent_bestiality with bestiality?

What I understood from forum #241176 was that it would be safer to tag both for the purpose of blacklisting extreme content. imminent_bestiality does seem to be used in a manner not matching with other imminent_* tags. Its application also overlaps with imminent_* bestiality, say for post like this one post #6023670 could have all 4 "imminent_penetration imminent_vaginal imminent_bestiality bestiality", in those cases I feel like it's just padding. It having a blank wiki also doesn't help.

I could limit it to only posts with partially offscreen animals, there's also implied_bestiality which seems to overlap a lot with imminent_bestiality if I look at how both are tagged (I feel like there's also a whole lot of mistag).

Reading the definition of bestiality, I could sort of read it as sex with an animal, etc. but the application is closer to tag group:sex acts with animal, etc. and should include non-penetrative acts, say this post #5841632 and parent being tagged bestiality but probably still something someone might try to search/blacklist (could maybe tweak the wiki a little).

Maybe:

Those examples are really confusing because I've mixed two topics in my head, hopefully it conveys what I'm thinking.

I'm not sure which side to lean on, conservative in usage and close to sister tags' definition with imminent_bestiality being its own new thing for its own tropes (to be defined more accurately), basically situation involving an animal but not actively "sex" yet, so not tagging bestiality. Or more liberal despite not matching their peers in usage, more liberally used for anything involving an animal, etc. which may follow with some form of inter/outercourse.

Whelp, morphed my forum post into a question on the usage of two tags, hopefully I didn't make it too confusing. I tried reformulating for the past hour but I keep making it more confusing so I'll leave it there for now, will try to reword later if it's too confusing.

Updated by DanbooruBot

Reply
AkaringoP

magcolo said:

post #6186898, post #6190808

These are chibi right? Don’t know if it’s the layered clothes or what, something's affecting my judgement on proportion. And would minigirl apply?

I think it's chibi.
Using minigirl requires something huge - but of normal proportions and sizes - to be comparable.
In particular, in the last example, we might think of this as a minigirl, but also think that the size of the character is average, the size of the mushroom is huge on the other hand.

Updated by DanbooruBot

Reply
magcolo

keonas said:

I see the Hololive Error school uniforms used as regular alt costumes outside the game's context and was wondering how to tag them?
There seem to be 3 or more variations, do they have a specific name for each? to make the **_school_uniform tags?
post #4933051
post #5288605
post #5339009

If you’re looking for the tag it’s aogami high school uniform. Wiki says that the serafuku is the "past version" and the blazer one is the "present-day version", so they’re currently under the same tag. Your second example is simply the blazer version without the blazer.

Updated by DanbooruBot

Reply
1 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 515