AI-generated art check thread

quccman said:

post #6171362

This is clearly AI
Look at the left hand fingers
The right hand fingers seem to have been redrawn on top
Look closely at the bra straps, they don't make sense, clearly AI generated
The rose on her hair also clearly AI generated

I disagree. Like in my comment in that picture they look more like drawing errors to me and possibly lazyness by the artist. And if you going to judge the picture by the anatomical mistakes, then go back even further than the last 4 images. I took the time to check this guys older uploads on pixiv. Those mistakes are found in almost every image of this artist.
Im pretty sure this guy uses assetts of other images rather than AI. If you check his pixiv description it says that so too.

ForTheNight said:

I disagree. Like in my comment in that picture they look more like drawing errors to me and possibly lazyness by the artist. And if you going to judge the picture by the anatomical mistakes, then go back even further than the last 4 images. I took the time to check this guys older uploads on pixiv. Those mistakes are found in almost every image of this artist.
Im pretty sure this guy uses assetts of other images rather than AI. If you check his pixiv description it says that so too.

As other users have pointed out, the latest images by the author are also AI. AI is notorious for generating bizarre hands, and you can see this effect clearly on the left hand. Look closely to things on her arm above the gloves, they have a very weird shape to them, for me it is 100% clear that it was generated by AI. I am very much confident that it is AI. The background is also a stretched image with compression artifacts

quccman said:

As other users have pointed out, the latest images by the author are also AI. AI is notorious for generating bizarre hands, and you can see this effect clearly on the left hand. Look closely to things on her arm above the gloves, they have a very weird shape to them, for me it is 100% clear that it was generated by AI. I am very much confident that it is AI. The background is also a stretched image with compression artifacts

All of that is also seen throughout this guys images even before AI images were a thing. And to add onto the other comments regarding the quality. If this was some rando that suddently started posting high quality art out of nowhere id say thats very suspicious. But you can see progress and increase in quality over the span of two years

ForTheNight said:

All of that is also seen throughout this guys images even before AI images were a thing. And to add onto the other comments regarding the quality. If this was some rando that suddently started posting high quality art out of nowhere id say thats very suspicious. But you can see progress and increase in quality over the span of two years

Looking over the past works it makes his new stuff look even more suspicious imo. The most recent four images are colored and shaded in a completely different way than previous drawings, its not even a subtle shift.

zetsubousensei said:

Looking over the past works it makes his new stuff look even more suspicious imo. The most recent four images are colored and shaded in a completely different way than previous drawings, its not even a subtle shift.

So i guess no one can make progress then? No one can change brushes or see their errors and improve on them over time? From the comments here i only gathered that the moment there is an error in an image, it MUST be AI. Ridiculus
I really wonder how you people treat actual new artists then that show improvement in their art

so for whoever flagged post #6171362 :

why only this one and not the previous works? Huh.

ForTheNight said:

So i guess no one can make progress then? No one can change brushes or see their errors and improve on them over time? From the comments here i only gathered that the moment there is an error in an image, it MUST be AI. Ridiculus
I really wonder how you people treat actual new artists then that show improvement in their art

Don't forget that the artist has also traced other artist work before (post #5628696 , post #5509821). I think it's kinda understandable if people think that someone like him will use AI.

If you're someone who creates art and also played around with AI a lot , it's pretty easy to tell if the art is ai/ai-assisted like post #6134690 where the background was generated using Pastel Mix or something that based on that model

Chud said:

Yes this is AI. Artist quality of art has "spiked" up during the time of AI art being popularized. I'd even suggest post #6134690, post #6071930, post #6064513, post #6037637 are as well AI. If not, AI-assisted at the least.

Interesting how they're not also flagged then.

ricroll said:

so for whoever flagged post #6171362 :

why only this one and not the previous works? Huh.

ricroll said:

Interesting how they're not also flagged then.

Probably because they didn't look at the older images. Keep in mind that many users will just flag the one image and move on with their lives. And that non-approver+ users have a limit to their active flags.

ForTheNight said:

So i guess no one can make progress then? No one can change brushes or see their errors and improve on them over time? From the comments here i only gathered that the moment there is an error in an image, it MUST be AI. Ridiculus
I really wonder how you people treat actual new artists then that show improvement in their art

I'm all for inprovement and experimentation, but this isn't a brush change and some error fixes. This is a whole new artstyle (that just so happens to be one of the most popular styles from the most popular generator) with a completely different approach and skill level of backgrounds (that happens to match the kind of backgrounds AI will draw unprompted), introduction of new types of errors (that all happen to be common in AI), a shift towards characters that are most commonly generated in AI due to volume, and a significantly faster turnover rate.

This one isn't paranoia. When it quacks and swims around and has feathers and a bill... you can call it a duck.

Take a look at this Looks Ai to me.
Artist is here on Danbooru as Create8.

Drimacus said:

Take a look at this Looks Ai to me.
Artist is here on Danbooru as Create8.

Can you give an example of why you think it looks AI to you, nothing is jumping out to me, the hair and straps look solid, the eyes have good detail and the eyelashes aren't a style I typically see in AI. The transparency in the bangs is very coherent as well, which is highly difficult for AI.

wispydreamer said:

Can you give an example of why you think it looks AI to you, nothing is jumping out to me, the hair and straps look solid, the eyes have good detail and the eyelashes aren't a style I typically see in AI. The transparency in the bangs is very coherent as well, which is highly difficult for AI.

It's the shading. Nothing more. So, do you think it is safe to upload?

Drimacus said:

It's the shading. Nothing more. So, do you think it is safe to upload?

Looking at the others works uploaded by them, it's almost certainly assissted. Their other works have very, very clear artifacts but also very clear cleanup.

ForTheNight said:

So i guess no one can make progress then? No one can change brushes or see their errors and improve on them over time? From the comments here i only gathered that the moment there is an error in an image, it MUST be AI. Ridiculus
I really wonder how you people treat actual new artists then that show improvement in their art

If someone uses their new skills to rapid spam a twitter timeline or art gallery that's kinda sus.

Throwaway9999 said:

If someone uses their new skills to rapid spam a twitter timeline or art gallery that's kinda sus.

-Pictures are at least 2 weeks apart
-rapid spam
Right

Infantramen said:

-Pictures are at least 2 weeks apart
-rapid spam
Right

It doesn't have to be that artist in particular. But it's definitely a trend of A.I being used to overinflate galleries. Usually with the same repeated faces, uninspired poses, letting blatant errors like bad fingers slide etc.

An organic evolution is when an Artist shows their improvement by doing varied but still polished work.

Throwaway9999 said:

It doesn't have to be that artist in particular. But it's definitely a trend of A.I being used to overinflate galleries. Usually with the same repeated faces, uninspired poses, letting blatant errors like bad fingers slide etc.

An organic evolution is when an Artist shows their improvement by doing varied but still polished work.

Then whats the point of your post if it doesnt describe this particular artist? You replied to me, its fair for me to assume you also meant the same artist.

-same repeated faces, uninspired poses....
Congratulations. You just described 90% if not all artists out there in a few words

-an orgnaic evolution...
And this artist in particular hasnt showed that how? Have you seen his older stuff? It looks terrible, then changes and gets better over time

Infantramen said:

-an orgnaic evolution...
And this artist in particular hasnt showed that how? Have you seen his older stuff? It looks terrible, then changes and gets better over time

It isn't compare the back of post #6064513 to the one immediately before post #6037637 look at the shading, the way light is used, the way the legs are oriented, the fact that there is a detailed background. The image is a completely different style and not the kind youd expect from someone just experimenting or naturally improving. I'm sure most of us are used to looking over full galleries as seeing what natural improvment looks like, this isn't it.

I don't know why so many people are coming out of the woodworks to defend this guy, if you look over his gallery its immediately obvious he's a tracer even before looking at images like post #5628696

His quality and understanding of human anatomy jumps all over the place, a lot of them are probably traced in some capacity even if its only snatching a single body part from another image. There is no sense of consistency. You can see improvements in stuff like the faces, but thats about it.

And no this isn't me saying nobody can improve over time, this is me saying this particular artist isn't.

zetsubousensei said:

It isn't compare the back of post #6064513 to the one immediately before post #6037637 look at the shading, the way light is used, the way the legs are oriented, the fact that there is a detailed background. The image is a completely different style and not the kind youd expect from someone just experimenting or naturally improving. I'm sure most of us are used to looking over full galleries as seeing what natural improvment looks like, this isn't it.

I don't know why so many people are coming out of the woodworks to defend this guy, if you look over his gallery its immediately obvious he's a tracer even before looking at images like post #5628696

His quality and understanding of human anatomy jumps all over the place, a lot of them are probably traced in some capacity even if its only snatching a single body part from another image. There is no sense of consistency. You can see improvements in stuff like the faces, but thats about it.

And no this isn't me saying nobody can improve over time, this is me saying this particular artist isn't.

Who cares I can show hundreds of artworks that are traced specially if it was commissioned.

Infantramen said:

-same repeated faces, uninspired poses....
Congratulations. You just described 90% if not all artists out there in a few words

No way. Artists can have a similar or distinct artstyle, but they're not copying and pasting the same features on each other.

Go take a look at One Piece. The Manga/Anime has been running for decades but the series has never slowed down with having new dynamic characters.

Or even check out this artwork of the Pokemon anime. Now THAT'S improvement, showing every character from the start of the anime to the most recent/last episode.

https://twitter.com/odd_sky475/status/1639223730823118849