Posted under General
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6059987
Noa's hair, eyes, halo and her costume is full colored in this post.
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6060197
Mika's are same here. Both posts have similar condition with https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6060180, and this post is already successfully approved.
Runty said:
I'm not seeing anything particularly glaring compared to Haganef's other works.
Long body with poor head-body ratio
I don't think the other works by the same artist are good either, tbh.
Hassantaleb4 said:
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6075491
Hello guys. I've posted this crossover artwork between Bocchi the Rock! and Guilty Gear. It has now been deleted and I don't understand why. I thought of it as cute, which is why I uploaded it onto the site in the first place. Also, I feel it had enough quality to be approved.
while cute images often have a good chance of being approved (just see chibi) for most of those images, they still need to have a propper quality. Like here, the faces of the girls are not that good, the sketchiness is kinda meh and the hand of the monster is bad.
Refer also to this post: https://danbooru.donmai.us/forum_posts/233708
I've uploaded 14/23 NGE tarot cards (22 cards and the back). I'd like to upload the high quality original scans as well.
In eg:
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6079219/events
It seems the deadlock (14 is the max) is in a lack of approval due to disinterest. However there are already inferior scans of this deck uploaded, which have been approved.
See also the comments on this image.
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6079356
post #6021599
why unapproved? I meticulously tagged it for accuracy. should the source be from pixiv? I thought mastodon was a perfectly fine source.
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6079219
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6079235
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6079256
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6079283
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6079296
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6079314
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6079323
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6079330
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6079333
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6079339
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6079352
Are part of a set. 22 total (+ the back).
3 have been approved.
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6079356
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6079351
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6079273
I'm noticing the same with currently pending uploads, including the original scans. The history indicates they aren't being approved due to disinterest. This isn't really a matter of any given person's interest, it's about historical preservation. Evangelion was a definite part of culture and animation history. The current approved copy of its official tarot card deck (bundled with EoE it seems) is poor quality, which is reason enough.
Talulah said:
Don't post three times almost in a row, and definitely do not ping random approvers begging them to approver your uploads. The only thing that will get you is in trouble.
Agreed.
I did approve them, as they seem to fit. I'm not sure the "cleaned up" versions should necessarily be the parents though (or that we really *need* three copies). For most of them the high-res originals with scan artifacts (e.g. post #6086561) should probably be the parents. The "cleaned up" versions although they hide the screen-printing, also mask details and make them sort of muddy.
Need feedback on post #6082966 and post #6082972
post #6064753
post #6064395
post #6071386
post #6071388
These are all official art, the first on the list got its parent approved so I'm also wondering why that one was rejected.
Updated
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/5997241?q=status%3Adeleted+user%3AKENKEN21
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6023513?q=status%3Adeleted+user%3AKENKEN21
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6050676?q=status%3Adeleted+user%3AKENKEN21
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6069292?q=status%3Adeleted+user%3AKENKEN21
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6069438?q=status%3Adeleted+user%3AKENKEN21
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6087052?q=status%3Adeleted+user%3AKENKEN21
All these were delated. What the problem?
I'm sorry to bother anyone, but I was wondering about this piece? ^^ The previous ones made sense, but I wasn't sure about this one.
post #6087036
post #6084400
post #6086884
especially surprised at the third one
Talulah said:
Don't post three times almost in a row, and definitely do not ping random approvers begging them to approver your uploads. The only thing that will get you is in trouble.
Sorry for the delayed response. Shinjidude was the original approver. With the name, and how long ago the originals were uploaded, I thought it would be pertinent. I wouldn't @ someone otherwise.
Shinjidude said:
Agreed.
I did approve them, as they seem to fit. I'm not sure the "cleaned up" versions should necessarily be the parents though (or that we really *need* three copies). For most of them the high-res originals with scan artifacts (e.g. post #6086561) should probably be the parents. The "cleaned up" versions although they hide the screen-printing, also mask details and make them sort of muddy.
Appreciate it. I couldn't really decide which should be the parent or "definitive" version for a few of them. Some are very clear net improvements (like wheel of fortune), some have a bit of loss of sharpness on background details. Generally I prefer raw scans with the grain and so on over something overly "smoothed", but I thought these came out pretty well. Hard to say. It would only make sense to have one full set the parent over the other.
It's strange how those two were rejected, but this other work by the same artist was approved.
post #5864390
Did the two Marianne pics get shot down due to being watermarked?
Runty said:
It's strange how those two were rejected, but this other work by the same artist was approved.
post #5864390Did the two Marianne pics get shot down due to being watermarked?
That was three months ago, which means a different set of people would've been active when approving. All the approvers have different tastes so sometimes you just don't know what's going to be approved.
m4rs said:
That was three months ago, which means a different set of people would've been active when approving. All the approvers have different tastes so sometimes you just don't know what's going to be approved.
Still, it feels strange that all three pics were cases of breast expansion and gigantic breasts, yet the first two weren't approved. Heck, the picture with Unicorn appears to have had no one giving it any reject votes (unless those get hidden after a while).
linil said:
post #6021599
why unapproved? I meticulously tagged it for accuracy. should the source be from pixiv? I thought mastodon was a perfectly fine source.
@linil, because none of the approvers liked the image itself (and not because of bad link--read the wiki for that tag, it's not that kind of "bad"). Just having good tagging is not sufficient, and changing the source to somewhere the post wasn't uploaded from doesn't fix anything.
I'm uploading the remainder of the raw Eva tarot scans and they're pending (and disapproved). 2 in the set have already been approved. It would be nice to upload the remaining 4 of the set, rather than waiting 3 days for them to be deleted.
Currently approved (of the raw scans):
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6086561
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6087028
The Magician was not approved.
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6087045
Updated
