Could anyone help me figure out what's wrong with the following posts? I'm still struggling to understand why some of my posts are not getting approved.
post #6103631
post #6103632
post #6103560
Posted under General
Could anyone help me figure out what's wrong with the following posts? I'm still struggling to understand why some of my posts are not getting approved.
post #6103631
post #6103632
post #6103560
Sir_Cumalot said:
Could anyone help me figure out what's wrong with the following posts? I'm still struggling to understand why some of my posts are not getting approved.
post #6103631
post #6103632
post #6103560
Personally I think the pink haired girl looks fine, foreshorteningon the back is probably the reason. The blonde girl has short arms and her legs look funky below the knees. It almost looks like they fuse. Not terrible quality though, just slightly off.
post #6098473
post #6098479
post #6098492
post #6098501
What on earth is "poor quality" about these? There are plenty of other works by this artist approved on the board.
zetsubousensei said:
Personally I think the pink haired girl looks fine, foreshorteningon the back is probably the reason. The blonde girl has short arms and her legs look funky below the knees. It almost looks like they fuse. Not terrible quality though, just slightly off.
Thanks for the reply! To be honest though, even after getting the wrong parts pointed out to me, I still can't spot the mistakes at all. E.g. the short arms look like regular size to me because they're further in the background. But yeah, I haven't studied arts or anything, guess I'll just have to accept that I can't judge this stuff and hope my uploads don't get deleted.
Speaking of bad anatomy, I actually expected one of my other recent uploads (post #6097688) to get deleted because her left hand looks conspicuously tiny to me. I took the risk and uploaded it anyway, and contrary to my expectations, that picture got approved quickly. This just adds to my confusion; am I really the only one thinking that the hand is badly drawn?
Sir_Cumalot said:
Speaking of bad anatomy, I actually expected one of my other recent uploads (post #6097688) to get deleted because her left hand looks conspicuously tiny to me. I took the risk and uploaded it anyway, and contrary to my expectations, that picture got approved quickly. This just adds to my confusion; am I really the only one thinking that the hand is badly drawn?
No, you're right, that hand is impossibly tiny.
Imanaya said:
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6098683 was initially approved on appeal, then flagged for unsourced dupe.
See these comments:
https://danbooru.donmai.us/comments/2296667 https://danbooru.donmai.us/forum_posts/234287
They aren't duplicates, they are the source. Other appeals are pending.The set has only been partially approved.
Not approved: https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6098679 https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6098676 https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6098674 https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6098672 https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6098670 https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6098666 https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6098662 https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6098656 https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6098650 https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6098649 https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6098646 https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6098644 https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6098641 https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6098638 https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6098633
Pending: https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6107287 https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6107281 https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6107280 https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6107276
Bumping and re-referencing this. In summary.
-I went looking for quality scans of the Eva tarot cards like 10+ years ago, found them
-Searching now that site is no longer on the net, or I can't find it anymore
-Everything else is a derivative of these scans
-The only other decent quality version is
https://e-hentai.org/g/945016/00f01885a3/
However wherever they got it, they'd been jpeg compressed for some (ill formed) reason.
-I made clean versions of what I had
-As discussed here https://danbooru.donmai.us/forum_posts/234287 many are clear net improvements but some show minor detail loss on background patterns.
So the plan was:
-Upload the cleaned versions
-Upload the original scans so they're available and people can use their own methods in the future
I would think what I'm doing and the rationale is very straightforward, but somehow it's not getting done.
The_Bob said:
No, you're right, that hand is impossibly tiny.
Good to know it's not just me, because this basically confirms that proper anatomy is not actually a prerequisite for approvals, which means that it probably comes down to personal preference of the approvers. Guess there's not much I can do to increase my approval rate after all.
Kyoriku said:
mumumu_(road)
why are arts of this artist in particular has been on the unapproved list all of a sudden? I don't think their quality has dropped or anything, it just stopped being approved at the last page of one of his comics for no reason.
Someone actually went and flagged other posts by that author ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I guess there are one or two approvers who like his nikke comics and now they aren't active.
post #6037448.
I posted four other fanarts (post #6037388, post #6037394, post #6037413, and post #6037435) by the same artist (roarke) and of the same series (Azur Lane), at around the same time; why did those four get approved, and not this one?
post #6106186
I know the highest res version of an image is always preferred but the since the higher res version is literally 30mb for a single image i thought this more standard size would also pass, was i wrong?
post #6103395
this one also seems okay to me, and this artist is especially good, it's the only post from them that's deleted. Is it that this one post is a bit more stylized than usual?
Mayhem-Chan said:
post #6106186
I know the highest res version of an image is always preferred but the since the higher res version is literally 30mb for a single image i thought this more standard size would also pass, was i wrong?
If someone wants a smaller version they can downscale it themselves or download the sample. There's not much point having the smaller one be active if the bigger one was already on Danbooru when it was uploaded.
Could anyone help me figure out what's wrong with the following posts?
post #6029073
post #5416829
post #6050374
post #6099026
post #6019392
post #6061034
post #6050649
post #6050381 and post #6050382 was initially approved on appeal,but...?
Updated
Hey, I'm new here, and after a month of uploading I feel like I still don't really have a grasp of what's considered high-quality enough to be accepted. I'd appreciate feedback on some of my deletions so I can better understand it for the future.
post #6101314 is literally a variation of an approved post with less clothing, which seems like a thing that gets commonly approved, so I have no idea what was wrong with this one.
post #6051016 is cleanly drawn, I don't see issues with it, and it's very similar to other posts of the artist that got approved like post #5635421
post #6072156 I also don't see what the issue is with this.
post #6057432 and post #6057453 are both very well drawn, detailed and with impressive shading.
post #6063349 is well drawn and very similar to the series of post #6029346 from the artist, so I'm wondering what about it was so much worse that it didn't get approved?
post #6064486 and post #6089643 are also very well drawn and colored.
post #6081595 is also detailed and well-drawn with well-executed lighting.
post #6106207 for this I also don't see what about it is worse than the artist's other Palutena drawings.
And post #6106380 as a 3D animation, the animation seemed impressively smooth and detailed to me, and the models were also very good, what about it was deemed poor quality?
I'm trying to fix a problem in what is a fairly straightforward case, replacing an inferior version of an imageset. It's now been two weeks and it still isn't done. The system isn't responsive, giving feedback, or cooperating, one approver accepts the appeal, then it's incorrectly flagged as a dupe again. I've linked and explained it here throughout that time. This kind of thing is apt to get stuck on the backburner in my mind and it's becoming very drawn out to get it conclusively approved or disapproved. I can't keep checking back every so many days and appeal each card in the set one by one. Requesting assistance resolving this @evazion (or anyone). I apologize if this is a violation of forum etiquette. No idea who to ask or where to post.
Copying my above post to summarize context.
-I went looking for quality scans of the Eva tarot cards like 10+ years ago, found them
-Searching now that site is no longer on the net, or I can't find it anymore
-Everything else is a derivative of these scans with degraded quality
-The only other semi-decent quality version of these exact scans is
https://e-hentai.org/g/945016/00f01885a3/
However wherever they got it, they'd been jpeg compressed for some reason. The original sources were not.
-I made clean versions of what I had
-As discussed here https://danbooru.donmai.us/forum_posts/234287 many are clear net improvements but some show minor detail loss on background patterns.
So the plan was:
-Upload the cleaned versions
-Upload the original scans so they're available and others can use their own methods in the future
I think what I'm doing and the rationale is reasonable, but something doesn't seem to be connecting because it isn't happening and my current appeals are so far being rejected due to duplicates.
I appreciate any assistance with this. Not intending to be obnoxious.
Edit: Forgot to include what I was talking about.
Imanaya said:
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6098683 was initially approved on appeal, then flagged for unsourced dupe.
See these comments:
https://danbooru.donmai.us/comments/2296667 https://danbooru.donmai.us/forum_posts/234287
They aren't duplicates, they are the source. Other appeals are pending.The set has only been partially approved.
Not approved: https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6098679 https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6098676 https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6098674 https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6098672 https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6098670 https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6098666 https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6098662 https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6098656 https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6098650 https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6098649 https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6098646 https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6098644 https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6098641 https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6098638 https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6098633
Pending: https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6107287 https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6107281 https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6107280 https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6107276
Updated
post #6104337: Feels questionable to be deleted, despite being one of the same characters illustrated by the same artist (suzuki-shi) in post #2783975, which happens to be uploaded by an Approver.
post #6106340: Same argument as my previous point; but, two different characters (one half of the sisters' Official Art, being featured/also deleted in post #6106391) in the same copyright/game, Syanago Collection.
Updated
Kyoriku said:
I see, meanwhile there are camera shot pictures and literally 720px stuffs being approved lol
Camera shot pictures are allowed provided it's traditional art, plenty of high quality images are still done traditionally. Also while large aspect ratios are nice, it isn't the end-all be-all of determining quality.
Updated
zetsubousensei said:
Camera shot pictures are allowed provided it's traditional are, plenty of high quality images are still done traditionally. Also while large aspect ratios are nice, it isn't the end-all be-all of determining quality.
Sure, they aren't suppose to be detrimental things, but when stuffs that are clearly above those lines are being uploaded and still being swept under the rug, I can only question personal bias.
These approvers even answer the appeal as "It seems rough compare to his past work" when it's literally the same quality, it just screams BS.
Some feedback on these deleted posts from me would be appreciated.