Zesh1 said:
From experience, it's better to upload official art when you have a first or second-party source. I have some third-party source uploads, more to come, but most were extracted from game files.
Posted under General
Zesh1 said:
From experience, it's better to upload official art when you have a first or second-party source. I have some third-party source uploads, more to come, but most were extracted from game files.
Laudividni said:
From experience, it's better to upload official art when you have a first or second-party source. I have some third-party source uploads, more to come, but most were extracted from game files.
Ohh
So what was wrong with post #2600444 ? It's not even mine, I'm just curious.
edit: and while we're at it, post #4769830
Updated
Latest page in a long-running comic :(
Hello, honorable staff members:
Usually I'd wait a few days to ask this, but I was wondering why these weren't approved, considering they were all quite high quality stuff. I understand muscular futanari aren't the most popular stuff about, but it'd be a shame that they didn't get approved:
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/5477888?q=user%3AILikeBuffGirls123+status%3Adeleted
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/5477850?q=user%3AILikeBuffGirls123+status%3Adeleted
This has yet to be approved and is still up, but I know how where the wind blows, because again, it's also pretty good stuff: https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/5483412?q=user%3AILikeBuffGirls123
As for non-futa girls, these two weren't approved, despite quite heavily liked (as far as muscle girls are concerned, anyway):
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/5477869?q=user%3AILikeBuffGirls123+status%3Adeleted
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/5450621?q=user%3AILikeBuffGirls123+status%3Adeleted
Thanks again.
punished_K said:
Latest page in a long-running comic :(
Damn, dude, that sucks. Hope that gets approved.
Maybe a second look for some of these?
post #5250362
post #5250365
post #5258879
post #5264570
post #5265056
post #5274483
post #5276203
post #5279069
post #5287528
post #5287535
post #5287540
post #5295742
post #5300999
post #5362310
post #5364849
post #5366963
post #5378338
post #5407801
post #5414421
post #5422515
post #5437328
post #5447908
post #5447917
post #5479300
post #5479302
Zesh1 said:
Its a good design but there is some aliasing and the resolution (size) is a bit low. As said before, thats a third party source, some approvers care about that.
DownWithTheThickness said:
So what was wrong with post #2600444 ? It's not even mine, I'm just curious.
edit: and while we're at it, post #4769830
1: Danbooru is an art repository that allows pornographic art but sexually explicit images are less likely to be approved than other images. Also her face doesnt seem to match her body, I understand its how she is designed but as you can tell there are only two posts with her that are active and one of them is a chibi.
2: Her right hipp is way off. Anime girls can have unusually wide hipps but this goes way beyond that.
punished_K said:
Latest page in a long-running comic :(
It seems most of the latest posts where uploaded by an unrestricted builder. I obviously dont know why Saladofstones hasnt approved this one though I advice you not to DM him about it. For me its the quite extreme amount of halftones that ruins it.
ILikeBuffGirls123 said:
Hello, honorable staff members:
Usually I'd wait a few days to ask this, but I was wondering why these weren't approved, considering they were all quite high quality stuff. I understand muscular futanari aren't the most popular stuff about, but it'd be a shame that they didn't get approved:
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/5477888?q=user%3AILikeBuffGirls123+status%3Adeleted
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/5477850?q=user%3AILikeBuffGirls123+status%3AdeletedThis has yet to be approved and is still up, but I know how where the wind blows, because again, it's also pretty good stuff: https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/5483412?q=user%3AILikeBuffGirls123
As for non-futa girls, these two weren't approved, despite quite heavily liked (as far as muscle girls are concerned, anyway):
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/5477869?q=user%3AILikeBuffGirls123+status%3Adeleted
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/5450621?q=user%3AILikeBuffGirls123+status%3Adeleted
I think the biggest problem here is futas with exaggerated dicks. Your first example has some quite horrible abs and weird torso muscles. The other two futa posts has probably run into the problem of muscular+futa+oversized genitals+somewhat western style, each of which would likely turn away some approvers.
post #5477869 is of mediocre quality with a photo background and (it seems to me) a slightly to small head.
I think post #5450621 has a bad waist, but its certainly not bad enough that I will flag it for deletion.
bastek66 said:
Maybe a second look for some of these?
post #5250362
post #5250365
post #5258879
post #5264570
post #5265056
post #5274483
post #5276203
post #5279069
post #5287528
post #5287535
post #5287540
post #5295742
post #5300999
post #5362310
post #5364849
post #5366963
post #5378338
post #5407801
post #5414421
post #5422515
post #5437328
post #5447908
post #5447917
post #5479300
post #5479302
This is the thread for asking about why a post wasnt approved. If you just want a second chance use the appeal funktion. These are way to many for me to go into detail about.
This wasn't uploaded by me, but I am wondering why did this one get deleted 4 years ago. I can't see anything wrong with it...
I uploaded a post for the first time, and it got rejected. post #5481755
I'm not really sure if it was rejected because of the artifacts on the background from Twitter's compression, if I did something wrong with creating the post, or if approvers just didn't like it. I'd love some feedback so I know what to not upload in the future.
If it's due to the artifacting, what are the rules around obtaining higher quality sources directly from the artist? I couldn't find any meta tag that seemed appropriate for that scenario, so I assumed it wasn't allowed.
Trif4 said:
I uploaded a post for the first time, and it got rejected. post #5481755
Your upload not getting approved had nothing to do with artifacts. It’s simply not that good.
The face is a bit meh and it’s still the best part of the image. It only gets worse the further down you go: weird head/body proportions, awkward pose, bad feet…
Why weren't post #5445505, post #5480293, and post #5483246 approved? They're just the textless variants
knsrgn said:
Why weren't post #5445505, post #5480293, and post #5483246 approved? They're just the textless variants
Honestly, I wouldn't approved any of them, textless or not. They've all got a bunch of odd anatomy glitches, stiff lines, and are just generally weird. For the latter two, the text versions were uploaded by an unres uploader, so they were never approved in the first place. For the first one, you'd have to ask the person who approved the text version. IMO, that first one is the worst of the bunch in terms of anatomy and details.
Sproq981 said:
This wasn't uploaded by me, but I am wondering why did this one get deleted 4 years ago. I can't see anything wrong with it...
Its a common misconception that deleted posts have to have something wrong with them. If no approver liked it enough to approve it then it got deleted. There are simply so many images with her that are more interesting. The biggest cons are probably image size and thigh to waist ratio.
ion288 said:
Its a common misconception that deleted posts have to have something wrong with them. If no approver liked it enough to approve it then it got deleted. There are simply so many images with her that are more interesting. The biggest cons are probably image size and thigh to waist ratio.
In this particular case, it was likely that approvers were reticent about it being official art from a dead link where an advertisement for the game used to be. It's approved now anyway.
While there're stuff like resolution that we can be picky about, I don't think they're enough for deletion.
post #5485662
Did I screw something up or approvers just dont like futa?
Is there something wrong with post #5488179 ? Is it sensitive or else ?
magcolo said:
While there're stuff like resolution that we can be picky about, I don't think they're enough for deletion.
In this case, approvers are likely very wary of a third-party source collage of what appears to be a manga series' book spines.
dzimmi said:
post #5485662
Did I screw something up or approvers just dont like futa?
Neither. It's just not a good picture, as it has a multitude of anatomy issues.
To everyone in this thread: The first question you should always ask when an image is deleted is "What is wrong with the quality?"
Veradux said:
In this case, approvers are likely very wary of a third-party source collage of what appears to be a manga series' book spines.
It's a manga series?
The only other version available on the web is those preview from online bookstores, which has worse resolution. I've look through all the official accounts (artist, author, dengeki bunko) and the bookstores.
What's wrong about post #5434482, post #5459377 and post #5490329?
Edit: Thanks for approving!
Updated