Upload Feedback Thread - post here if your uploads keep getting deleted

Pizzastoners said:

I don't get why this post wasn't approved like at all post #5521020

It's far too sketchy and End User License Agreement's neck is a bit funky.

ziin1234 said:

post #1436882 - the parent is deleted, but the child is accepted so I want to make sure

Both were uploaded by an unrestricted user nine year ago. Once you get past about five years things get a little weird in what is or isn't approved.

gun431 said:

I don't get why this post wasn't approved post #5514797

It's really not good. It's technically kind of vaguely acceptable in the anatomy and whatnot, but it's poorly shaded and has essentially no linework.

tarcocksky said:

also, i don't get why post #4966950 and post #4966955 weren't approved either

Bad anatomy.

TS050 said:

Would love to get an opinion on post #5461446 and post #5461425. I might be partially biased, since I have commissioned these artworks, but I'm open to anyone naming possible flaws these two might have.

Danbooru is an art repository that allows pornographic art but sexually explicit images are less likely to be approved than other images.
The second example has a rather pointy chin, but I realised it wasnt that bad otherwhise.

punished_K said:

Guess I don't understand what the approvers want anymore.
Or they all dislike me, again.

The cue is absolutely flooded right now. I think approvers has raised their standards as a result.

Was I just completely skipped over? Anyway, I'll repost once because I'd really like an answer.

post #5515795

post #5529082

Need to know why

Narrator-1 said:

Was I just completely skipped over? Anyway, I'll repost once because I'd really like an answer.

post #5515795

I'm not an approver, but in light of the lack of responses, I will say that's a pretty bad right arm and hand.

https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/5528118?q=user%3AILikeBuffGirls123+status%3Adeleted

Any reason why this got deleted, despite the previous ones being just fine?

https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/5527440?q=status%3Adeleted+user%3AGBDGSmut

I'm trying to gauge what my uploads need to not get canned.

Need feedback on post #5530030

Narrator-1 said:

Was I just completely skipped over? Anyway, I'll repost once because I'd really like an answer.

post #5515795

This image has a failure of depth, her torso looks flattened, her right arm is off and her hipps dosnt look like shes sitting upright. Her panties looks a bit weird to. Even if all of these problems werent present the image isnt very interesting, so approvers might just skip it if they are tired of "girl in underwear" posts.

vivoleko01 said:

post #5529082

Need to know why

Thats an artstyle that isnt appealing to many approvers.

ILikeBuffGirls123 said:

https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/5528118?q=user%3AILikeBuffGirls123+status%3Adeleted

Any reason why this got deleted, despite the previous ones being just fine?

I dont know which the previous one was, but each image is judged separately (unless part of a pool). I recon the gun nuts where unimpressed by the gun art, the shading is quite flat in places and a lot of details are, eh, incomplete? That face turned me away.

GBDGSmut said:

https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/5527440?q=status%3Adeleted+user%3AGBDGSmut

I'm trying to gauge what my uploads need to not get canned.

Ouf, her neck, face and head shape are quite bad. Silicone tit from her shoulder. Rough right hand and its rating: explicit which is always less likely to get approved than "higher" rating.

Danbooru is trying to be an art archive, not just a porn site. Pretentious perhaps, but its how many approvers are approaching this.

Better anatomy and better drawing quality would raise your chances immensely.

Nitramy said:

Need feedback on post #5530030

Doomguy is making an exaggerated Gundam model. I dont get the joke here. Comic with a western style and mostly western characters. Its not "off topic" but most of our approvers are quite animefile. Art quality isnt great either.

ion288 said:

Doomguy is making an exaggerated Gundam model. I dont get the joke here. Comic with a western style and mostly western characters. Its not "off topic" but most of our approvers are quite animefile. Art quality isnt great either.

The model actually exists IRL (a variant of the Glory of Losers Igel unit equipped on the Heavyarms Custom), and a lot of this artist's work was also approved on this site (some of it in the same style and comparable quality of this illustration)

(don't want to explain the joke, but the punch line is what Sam Stone says "new gun" compared to what Doomguy is building a "new gun(dam)")

ion288 said:

This image has a failure of depth, her torso looks flattened, her right arm is off and her hipps dosnt look like shes sitting upright. Her panties looks a bit weird to. Even if all of these problems werent present the image isnt very interesting, so approvers might just skip it if they are tired of "girl in underwear" posts.

Thats an artstyle that isnt appealing to many approvers.

I dont know which the previous one was, but each image is judged separately (unless part of a pool). I recon the gun nuts where unimpressed by the gun art, the shading is quite flat in places and a lot of details are, eh, incomplete? That face turned me away.

Ouf, her neck, face and head shape are quite bad. Silicone tit from her shoulder. Rough right hand and its rating: explicit which is always less likely to get approved than "higher" rating.

Danbooru is trying to be an art archive, not just a porn site. Pretentious perhaps, but its how many approvers are approaching this.

Better anatomy and better drawing quality would raise your chances immensely.

Doomguy is making an exaggerated Gundam model. I dont get the joke here. Comic with a western style and mostly western characters. Its not "off topic" but most of our approvers are quite animefile. Art quality isnt great either.

Ouf, this site is fun. Appreciate the constructive criticism, though.

ion288 said:

The cue is absolutely flooded right now. I think approvers has raised their standards as a result.

I do see it's harder & harder to stand out.
But personally, I don't think the quality standard has raised much.

Oh well.
Guess this is my boomer moment.

Any chance I could get feedback on post #5532226?

no longer applicable, thank you

post #5532533 post #5532530 post #5532529 post #5478256
Hi! I just wanna ask why this 4 post were exactly rejected, with the first 3 someone say it was because the source, but I have already use similar sources for other images that were approved (most images comes from the same wiki) so what make the difference with these images? with the last one it have a" "correct" source (twitter), but don't get why it wasn't approved.

BaraStuff19 said:
...

Poor sources are something most approvers try to skip, because you never know what kind of source it is and if it's correct. Third-party sources are marked red in the modqueue, to warn approvers of such images. Also, artist request in addition to a third-party source is also suspicious.
It's easier to upload such images when you're unrestricted.

Nacha said:

Poor sources are something most approvers try to skip, because you never know what kind of source it is and if it's correct. Third-party sources are marked red in the modqueue, to warn approvers of such images. Also, artist request in addition to a third-party source is also suspicious.
It's easier to upload such images when you're unrestricted.

Hmm ok, but what I could do to improve them then? Like those images belong to the game so the artist can't exactly publish them in their twitter or pixiv and much less when the game doesn't credit the artist. Or I can only hope they get approved despite the source? BTW what was the reason of last image, the one of this Claude? Or it was just skipped? Also ty for reply.

post #5535784 also this one as well post #5529733

BaraStuff19 said:

Hmm ok, but what I could do to improve them then? Like those images belong to the game so the artist can't exactly publish them in their twitter or pixiv and much less when the game doesn't credit the artist. Or I can only hope they get approved despite the source? BTW what was the reason of last image, the one of this Claude? Or it was just skipped? Also ty for reply.

well, fandom wiki is a third-party source, this means that they must've gotten those images somewhere, unless it's a direct datamine/screenshot from the game. Try to look up official accounts and sites or do a reverse image search.

magcolo said:

well, fandom wiki is a third-party source, this means that they must've gotten those images somewhere, unless it's a direct datamine/screenshot from the game. Try to look up official accounts and sites or do a reverse image search.

Hmmm ok I could try that, but in case they come from datamine, then I can't do a thing, right?

BaraStuff19 said:

Hmmm ok I could try that, but in case they come from datamine, then I can't do a thing, right?

It's fine to use fandom wiki images, if there is no other source. Just remember, that approvers often skip third-party sources and that these sometimes get deleted.