Posted under General
the jawline? nor have I honestly noticed, well, understandable.
now I have a similar question, what is the problem with the following posts? ( post #4939376 post #4939380 post #4939383 post #4933066 )
I mean, this version ( post #4514950 ) is too similar, it only changes that the other versions do not have text and that it includes more censorship.
What's the issue with this one? (post #4943594) I genuinely do not get it
post #4943617
I used the direct link to the image from the artist's official page. Did I have to link to the image post page for the post to be approved?
Dolmatov said:
post #4943617
I used the direct link to the image from the artist's official page. Did I have to link to the image post page for the post to be approved?
Yes. ".png" sources like that are not what we want, as it doesn't actually lead to the source of the image. It leads to just the image, meaning there's no way to verify that it's not a pirated source or similar. It's why pixiv and twitter sources use the post URL and not the "show full image" URL.
post #4944824 and post #4944822 have the similiar content.
But the latter was approved, while the former did not.
I believe that post #4944824 was just missed while pending.
Updated
Hello, Can I have a feedback about this post? https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/4945479?q=doki_doki_literature_club+
About why it may not be accepted? (it has been 3 days already)
Hello, I would like to know the reason on why this post was deleted.
Was it because the drawing is too westernish and american comic book-like? that's fine.
Is it because I didnt include a source and the artist? then I'm sorry I couldn't do anything about that, I found the drawing in a reddit post and the OP did make the mention of the artist, but I didn't find it in any of their social media, so I couldn't corroborate. Plus the artist drawing style was not that similar.
Updated
post #4945786
I purposely added a translation of the commentary to emphasize that it was a revision, but no one seemed to care.
I don't understand why did the artworks by puck100ml that I uploaded last week were deleted, given that they look quite good and there are plenty by the same artist already up. Examples: post #4939299 and post #4939324. I at least would like to know why.
Nothing appears to be anatomically wrong with her, so why the reject? Shading issues?
Some invisible fatal flaw I can't see?
Updated
I think these posts deserve another look, because they're more than good enough quality-wise.
BreadSlice said:
Hello, Can I have a feedback about this post? https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/4945479?q=doki_doki_literature_club+
About why it may not be accepted? (it has been 3 days already)
Kinda uninteressting artstyle with nothing interesting added. I would also say, that the head is weirdly big.
MisterSeven7 said:
Hello, I would like to know the reason on why this post was deleted.
Was it because the drawing is too westernish and american comic book-like? that's fine.
Is it because I didnt include a source and the artist? then I'm sorry I couldn't do anything about that, I found the drawing in a reddit post and the OP did make the mention of the artist, but I didn't find it in any of their social media, so I couldn't corroborate. Plus the artist drawing style was not that similar.
I do believe that other approvers are also repelled by third-party sources like reddit.
NekoAria said:
post #4945786
I purposely added a translation of the commentary to emphasize that it was a revision, but no one seemed to care.
Approvers don't necessarily look into commentaries while approving, they only look at the image and tags. Self uploads are also frowned up on Danbooru (which doesn't mean they aren't accepted, but they have a harder time being approved.)
post #4938235
Like I said in the appeal, it's an official image of a new game without alterations and yet it was rejected without any reason, why?
AltrougeBrunestud said:
post #4938235
Like I said in the appeal, it's an official image of a new game without alterations and yet it was rejected without any reason, why?
Official Art doesn't mean something gets automatically approved. The image still has to look good enough to be approved.
It's not even tagged with official art to start with, it doesn't help.
Additional tip:
Don't appeal things so close to when it was deleted. Approver's votes get purged after one month, so if you appeal something before that purge it will only be shown to approvers who hadn't already voted on it. Given the nature of the queue, this typically means you'll be showing it to about 0-2 new approvers.
Updated
what's wrong with these?
post #4911609
post #4911610
post #4911611
I would like to know what is the problem with this post #4626193
I have been looking for some big issue and did not find any.
same for this post #4728182 and this post #4766758
regarding this post #4327337 I just don't get it, the image uses Izumi takemoto's style, I can't find the problem here.
the last, what is the problem with this post #4935961 ? yeah, the legs may not be the best, but the rest of the image is pretty decent right?
thank you for your time
