Is it possible to give a second chance to post #4884210, post #4631850 and post #4547599, please?
Posted under General
Is it possible to give a second chance to post #4884210, post #4631850 and post #4547599, please?
knsrgn said:
Is it possible to give a second chance to post #4884210, post #4631850 and post #4547599, please?
Just click on “Appeal” on the post pages. Don’t bother with the last one, though. It’s pretty bad, especially the face and hands.
post #4921760
I'm confused as to why this didn't get approved. It has the same quality as every other work from the artist
Mushi191 said:
post #4921760
I'm confused as to why this didn't get approved. It has the same quality as every other work from the artist
The shading is considerably worse than their other works, especially around the bust which is also lopsided. But the issue is the hands. Since it's a paw pose of some sort, the focus is on the artist's biggest weak point.
Hello, anyone could tell me what was wrong with this image?
I don't understand japanese but maybe it had to do with the written text?
MisterSeven7 said:
Thanks for approving my post! I don't know why it got deleted in the first place, perhaps because I mistakenly tagged it as though there were just two characters and thought they were the same person.
Mistags and text will almost never be a reason for a post to not be approved. More likely it was just missed while pending. It happens, there are hundreds of posts a day.
My post was deleted because there is a "superior version in the same pixiv batch", which is this post #3553545.
But I was thinking that we could make the better, finished version of the drawing the parent of the unfinished one?
Edit: Thanks!
Updated
Why wasn't post #4924689 approved?
knsrgn said:
Why wasn't post #4924689 approved?
Weirdly "spread out" proportions. One shoulder is longer the other and the shading makes them look slightly v-shaped. Eyes too far apart for where the mouth and nose and placed. Makin' me go Hmmmmm a little too hard.
Also, the pattern on the dress is a static image with the cloth folds drawn on top.
post #4925629
post #4848302
post #4150161
These all seem to be of similar quality to other posts by the same artists that were approved, is there any particular reason these weren't?
post #4927257
post #4927249
post #4927240
post #4923608
post #4923524
I can understand the Gura picture being rejected since the head seems a bit off but the others look fine to me. Some feedback would be appreciated.
Could someone help me with this picture? The deletion appeal I made got rejected.
post #4937809
What's wrong with this Konata?
Why was my following post approved ( post #4923027 ) but not any of the following variations ( post #4923064 post #4923065 post #4923068 post #4923069 post #4923070 post #4923072 )?
I mean, I would understand if neither version had been approved, I would have assumed it was not a high quality illustration, but one of all has been approved, so it makes me think that it is of good quality.
in other words, What was found on the first image that was considered good quality (good enough to be approved) that lacks all other versions to be disapproved?
tremolo_measure said:
Why was my following post approved ( post #4923027 ) but not any of the following variations ( post #4923064 post #4923065 post #4923068 post #4923069 post #4923070 post #4923072 )?
I mean, I would understand if neither version had been approved, I would have assumed it was not a high quality illustration, but one of all has been approved, so it makes me think that it is of good quality.in other words, What was found on the first image that was considered good quality (good enough to be approved) that lacks all other versions to be disapproved?
I approved the first one but noticed her jawline doesn't look right so I skipped the rest.