Type-kun said:
...Personally, I think it'll be fine after getting rid of bugs, fixing layout pitfalls and debating about features we need, but it'll take months unless there's a place where we can do it properly. Github doesn't really seem fit for this purpose (except bugs ofc), and... well, did we see any response from devs in this thread?
Yes, there were responses right after the upgrade. Currently, albert seems to be focusing on fixing bugs and inconveniences posted on Github, and he's going pretty quickly, having fixed 28 issues in the last hour. I don't think it will take months at that rate.
Steak said:
I don't want to sound entitled, given that my contributions to the site are neglible at best, but apparently things are working for some people, while they don't work for me. This worries me, because it implies a problem on my end, when there was no problem at all before.
I am not literate when it comes to programming and making even minor adjustments to webrowsing. But I feel conflicted whether I should bring attention to my issues, becausee I don't want to be a bother and I understand that some hosts want to know if someone is having a problem with their site.
If you're having a problem, post it. If you don't post it, how is it going to get fixed?
Edit:
And GitHub is fine for very bad layout issues like the pool link not being in the navbar. I posted that on GitHub and it was just fixed.