Probably, but I'm still experimenting with the layout.
Posted under Bugs & Features
theo1996 said:
The daily popular image grid is just one long column of the images. But I have an old browser FF48. It was working yesterday. Would be nice to have a setting to show the old layout so that it works.
The thumbnail grids now use proper grids, which Firefox supports from version 52 onwards
evazion said:
Firefox ESR 78 is the oldest supported version of Firefox.
kittey said:
The thumbnail grids now use proper grids, which Firefox supports from version 52 onwards
Yeah I know just would be nice if it still worked for older versions ,because it did just fine...
theo1996 said:
Yeah I know just would be nice if it still worked for older versions ,because it did just fine...
Time marches on and standards change, either upgrade firefox to 78ESR or if you have a problem with the newer versions that's causing you to stick to that old one, consider looking into a fork or pale moon/vivaldi/whatever the kids are using these days.
SaladBadger said:
The smaller sidebar for smaller screens has really helped out things on my dumpy old samsung tablet, which I'm thankful for.
And it totally screws me over. The image is clipping into the search bar making the button unclickable.
Is there a toggle where I can go back to the way it was before?
bunkhead said:
And it totally screws me over. The image is clipping into the search bar making the button unclickable.
Is there a toggle where I can go back to the way it was before?
Adjust the CSS width yourself if needed.
For example:
#page #sidebar { width: 16em; }
Updated
Seems like the ability to display post scores and favcounts underneath image thumbnails via the Miscellaneous Tweaks script is gone.
Is it because of the new API limitations or something? Just want to make sure because this script's worked fine for me for 5+ years and I don't want to mess with it if it's just a Danbooru API thing.
bunkhead said:
Nope, doesn't work.
I updated the CSS I posted earlier. It just needed some additional specificity. You can either add additional ID/class selectors like I did, or you can add !important
like what Nameless Contributor did.
For reference, the current specificity of the min width selectors is 0-0-1-1-3, and the one I posted is 0-0-2-0-0, which is higher. If you add !important
instead, then it becomes 1-0-1-0-0, which beats both.