Donmai

Danbooru changelog discussion thread

Posted under Bugs & Features

theo1996 said:

Yeah I know just would be nice if it still worked for older versions ,because it did just fine...

Time marches on and standards change, either upgrade firefox to 78ESR or if you have a problem with the newer versions that's causing you to stick to that old one, consider looking into a fork or pale moon/vivaldi/whatever the kids are using these days.

SaladBadger said:

The smaller sidebar for smaller screens has really helped out things on my dumpy old samsung tablet, which I'm thankful for.

And it totally screws me over. The image is clipping into the search bar making the button unclickable.
Is there a toggle where I can go back to the way it was before?

bunkhead said:

And it totally screws me over. The image is clipping into the search bar making the button unclickable.
Is there a toggle where I can go back to the way it was before?

Try disabling userscripts or custom css and see if that's causing it.

bunkhead said:

And it totally screws me over. The image is clipping into the search bar making the button unclickable.
Is there a toggle where I can go back to the way it was before?

Adjust the CSS width yourself if needed.

For example:

#page #sidebar {
    width: 16em;
}
Edit:
  • (2021-12-15) Added additional ID selector for additional specificity

Updated

Seems like the ability to display post scores and favcounts underneath image thumbnails via the Miscellaneous Tweaks script is gone.

Is it because of the new API limitations or something? Just want to make sure because this script's worked fine for me for 5+ years and I don't want to mess with it if it's just a Danbooru API thing.

Scores are now visible by default by clicking on the "..." menu in the top right, and since now members can vote too the difference between faves and score is minimal, so you don't really need that script anymore if you're only using it for that.

bunkhead said:

Nope, doesn't work.

I updated the CSS I posted earlier. It just needed some additional specificity. You can either add additional ID/class selectors like I did, or you can add !important like what Nameless Contributor did.

For reference, the current specificity of the min width selectors is 0-0-1-1-3, and the one I posted is 0-0-2-0-0, which is higher. If you add !important instead, then it becomes 1-0-1-0-0, which beats both.

1 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 44