Donmai

How do I tag this?

Posted under Tags

AverageResUser said:

This is what ikemen describes (handsome/matured beauty). Bishounen falls closer to beautiful/cute/pretty (cute is typically not used to describe this appearance). If you take a look through some of the pages of bishounen you'll find that they're a bit closer to what you want. There's no real other term besides the last one you mentioned though that would also be incorrect to use for the post you linked.

"Bishounen" and "Ikemen" have overlaps, an ikemen on the androgynous/pretty side will likely also be a bishonen. Bishounen while being a bit less mature than ikemen, still requires some degree of maturity, compare to stuff like shota. But that's not the point, my wording was a bit confusing, sorry. I was focusing on the fact that post #6134653 lacks androgyny, the face is cute while everything else is too masculine (very short hair even for boys, lack of bangs, clothing), making it a "young-looking boy" but not enough for a "pretty boy". That's the biggest problem. Personally I do also think true bishounen should have a bit more maturity than baby-faced cute boys, but I wouldn't bother if someone else use the tag on them since we don't have a good replacement to make up our lack of a shota tag.

magcolo said:

Personally I do also think true bishounen should have a bit more maturity than baby-faced cute boys, but I wouldn't bother if someone else use the tag on them since we don't have a good replacement to make up our lack of a shota tag.

Bishota would be the equivalent tag, but given that shota on here is only used for sexual art, it would probably confuse people.

post #7426142
Continuing on the theme of "being confused by robots", is this humanization (humanoid robot to android)?
post #7559868
This is a (canonically) sexless robot that went from having no breasts to having (maybe) breasts, at least a boobplate.
He is referred to as male in canon. In this artwork, he has breasts and an androgynous appearance, but is still a sexless robot.
Is it still a genderswap if it goes from a humanoid robot to an android with a boobplate? Is it crossdressing? Is my life a lie?

I'm on my phone so I can't give examples easily but, azure lane, kancolle, yuri and sister ships in the same class; is this treated as incest? I see some azure Honolulu and st louis yuri tagged so and some as not so. Which is correct?

Not sure if this was asked so before.

ToxicOrochi said:

I'm on my phone so I can't give examples easily but, azure lane, kancolle, yuri and sister ships in the same class; is this treated as incest? I see some azure Honolulu and st louis yuri tagged so and some as not so. Which is correct?

Not sure if this was asked so before.

There was topic #23733

Unbreakable said:

There was topic #23733

Thanks, I'm not active enough to see these sometimes. I'm not sure I agree that just being "sister ships" in the same class counts, but maybe I'm missing something? Not familiar with some azure/kancolle lore. It's also not my call anyhow.

reg_panda said:

copyright request: sakurai_masahiro_(soul_hackers) is tagged with 3 different copyrights, devil summoner, shin megami tensei, soul hackers.
Thats too much, there should be copyright implications between them, or crossover tags

Currently it seems Devil Summoner is being used for the sub-series so it should at least be renamed to Devil Summoner (series) or something

and then I would implicate soul hackers and soul hackers 2 to that tag. no clue if the OG Devil Summoner game has any unique art but if so then Devil Summoner (game) or something should be made and put on them (and also imply the series tag)

I can do all this in a forum post tomorrow it seems straightforward

For now, the copyright tags on the 4 posts of Sakurai are technically correct.

edit: topic #27429

Updated