Upload Feedback Thread - post here if your uploads keep getting deleted

Katajanmarja said:
I had something more than a hunch but had been wondering about the exact definition for a while... So your question made me check it out.

The Free Dictionary only recognizes the spelling subpar and gives the following meanings:

"1. Not measuring up to traditional standards of performance, value, or production.

2. Below par in a hole, round, or game of golf."

I wasn't asking for the definition >_< or implying he spelled it wrong >_<;

Just asking what he's more likely to approve, and if he doesn't like explicit pictures then what explicit pictures would he deem good enough to approve?

You'd be hard pressed to get me, personally, to approve much of anything under rating:e. Many of the ones I have were either 1) a mistake, 2) rated incorrectly and should really be questionable 3) reapproving something I don't quite like but that was flagged for frivolous reasons or 4) are e only by the slightest technicality (ever so slightly visible genitals). And I think I've approved like 1 rating:e in the past year... granted I've also not been as active as an approver n the past year due to being busy with other things, but that's still pretty telling. All that said, this is why we have multiple approvers, not just me.

So when I say sub-par, I mean it in a general way, across the whole staff. A lot of your deleted posts tend to be not necessarily technically bad art in terms of color and detail, but iffy on proportions - you know, huge tits and asses to the detriment, at least in the eyes of most approvers, of the overall body proportions and appeal of the image. That or they're just sexually explicit in a way that's pretty hit or miss - lots of fluids and genital close-ups and the like.

post #779497
post #779997
post #759537

nanami said:
post #779497
post #779997
post #759537

Generally it's the faces and proportions.

Sorry for piling up so many (I know about recommended limit up to 5 arts), but I don't write in this thread very often :

post #771580 I know the ugly face behind might be a problem, but the rest ?
post #781824 safe, high resolution, huh ?
post #773242
post #778674
post #779756
post #779885
post #779886
post #780624
post #780118 <- higher resolution and unapproved ?
post #781414
post #781824 <- I know that her hip may look a bit strangely drawn, but all in all, it's kinda good art - I guess

post #665022
post #633333

nanami said:
post #665022
post #633333

Bizarre head:body ratio

post #544881 (official art)
post #527837 (not my upload, but worth looking)

post #782614
post #782616

post #761059
post #760836
post #757985

These are all textless versions of post #758404, post #758404, and post #758675 respectively.

post #758758
post #758760
post #758761

nanami said:

post #760836 - weird hand defect
post #757985 - kotomi's faces and angular chins for me at least.

Textless versions: something about the positioning of the head/neck on those bug me, I can't put it into words but I know it bugs me.

post #751305
post #756554
post #757753

nanami said:
post #751305

Tomoya's arms/hands are like, bizarro huge. I suspect he was thawed out of a block of ice just days ago.

post #719703
post #763696
post #748887

post #783919

post #570720
post #571969

post #771884

post #757752
post #757292
post #736775

Mr_GT said:
post #783919

Shouldn't you have this figured out by now?

nanami said:
post #570720
post #571969

The way the bodies are drawn is just...weird and kinda disturbing.

Krugger said:
post #771884

Dumb and badly drawn

nanami said:
post #757752
post #757292
post #736775

First and third are just bleh. Undeleted the middle one.

Remember guys, this isn't the deletion appeal thread, stop using it as such.