Donmai

Upload Feedback Thread - post here if your uploads keep getting deleted

Posted under General

Siknakaliux said:

Requesting to checkover these deleted posts, I've added more tags and wish for a 2nd opinion

Most approvers do not consider whether a post is thoroughly tagged. You should still do it, but it won’t really increase your chances of getting them approved.

post#8640059
post#8640070
post#8640077
post#8640101

The 5th image managed to get approved, so I was wondering if the other 4 were of low quality or just not liked enough.

35pmachi said:

https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8679041?q=user%3A35pmachi+status%3Apending
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8660220
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8671799?q=status%3Adeleted+user%3A35pmachi
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8677121?q=user%3A35pmachi+status%3Apending

sigh

post #8679041 and post #8677121 were still pending when you asked. This thread is for deleted posts. Wait until after the first three days.

You were already given feedback on post #8660220, and I see what they mean about the hands. The right wrist is definitely twisted farther than what is realistically possible for most humans (I tried and couldn’t even get close).

andlabs said:

I'm confused about why post #8342515, which is mine, and post #8224074, which is someone else's, are low quality. In particular, my appeal on that first one was responded with "Time to flag some of this artist for rewiew", but only that one other post wound up being flagged. I'm not seeing how they're different from the other approved posts by that artist? I get that most of their posts are meme-esque and have additional stylistic filters added to them, but that wasn't the case for mine.

I'd like to once again ask about these two, as well as the following failed appeals:

post #8606666
This is the SFW parent of an approved NSFW child post (post #8611756). What's wrong with this one that isn't an issue with the NSFW one?
Thanks!

post #8617446
I'm not seeing what's wrong with this one.
Thanks!

post #8580880
I understand that Takane looks a bit big in this one, but I chalked that up to the artist drawing her as muscular and therefore bigger in general. In fact, they have since posted more art that only further confirms that point. Is something else wrong with it that I'm missing?

post #8348218
May as well also throw this in, since it's the only failed appeal so far that isn't listed here. Is there something wrong with the sketch nature of it, or is there something else wrong? I just checked the artist's page and they did upload a more polished/finished version as well that I completely missed.

Thanks!

Updated

My deleted post #8676527 's resolution is 3218x4096.
Parent post #8678619 's resolution is 5500x7000, which was posted later.

I know that the post with lower resolution can be ignored not to be approved and be deleted in result.
My question is whether the fact that those 2 posts have artist's different commentary could be the reasonable reason of appeal and approval.