post #8645471
post #8619651
post #8615752
post #8616398
post #8640550
post #8579564
post #8657933
Was wondering if I could appeal these posts, or feedback as to why they weren't approved.
Posted under General
post #8645471
post #8619651
post #8615752
post #8616398
post #8640550
post #8579564
post #8657933
Was wondering if I could appeal these posts, or feedback as to why they weren't approved.
supertrashbros said:
If only 3 reviewers look at a post, does that signal it's probably just bad timing/unlucky, rather than a problem with the post quality?
Usually it means the latter, but from what other approvers have told us; it doesn't mean only 3 approvers have seen it, as it means at least 3 approvers have seen it and took action.
Regardless, it's still valid for an appeal.
supertrashbros said:
If only 3 reviewers look at a post, does that signal it's probably just bad timing/unlucky, rather than a problem with the post quality?
Probably. I suppose it's because this month isn't as busy as it is and not as much contributors are active based off what I'm hearing
This is an exploded version of a video(post #4656634 ) that has been reviewed. You really don’t check it these days.
What is the point of an image getting approved and someone flagging it to send it back to deletion? Then what is the point of having someone to approve it just to let it go away again? That's not funny
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8660220
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8326868?q=status%3Adeleted+user%3A35pmachi
I hate this. If some approver(s) agree to approve it then that should be the stopping point. Abusing this system to do whatever you want is not funny to anybody and only makes the system feel like a joke.
We already have so many deleted posts with fewer than 4 approvers checking them, which means the majority of approvers are NOT even active or doing the work because this is not a job, but none of that is fair to people who still constantly upload posts. Flagging another post is to abuse the system at a time when 1/10 of approvers are barely active and do not work properly. None of this is funny to anyone.
Also, to anyone who flagged the post and said "no left leg?" must have no understanding in how perspective works and only did the flag for the sake of abusing it.
Updated
35pmachi said:
I hate this. If some approver(s) agree to approve it then that should be the stopping point. Abusing this system to do whatever you want is not funny to anybody and only makes the system feel like a joke.
If a post is good enough, multiple approvers will agree to approve it independently of each other. A post shouldn't only rely on one person liking it, it should have some consensus. And if someone thinks it was approved in error (unless it's flag vandalism), they're welcome to flag it. The system's working exactly as intended.
Also, to anyone who flagged the post and said "no left leg?" must have no understanding in how perspective works and only did the flag for the sake of abusing it.
Unless you're literally looking at someone directly from the side, you'll see at least a little bit of their other leg peeking out behind the other one. This is at a 45-degree angle more or less, so it should be visible.
(also the hand is still pretty wonky ngl)
Ylimegirl said:
Unless you're literally looking at someone directly from the side, you'll see at least a little bit of their other leg peeking out behind the other one. This is at a 45-degree angle more or less, so it should be visible.
This is further supported by the position of the bikini bottom straps and the visible crotch, which show that the pelvis is rotated slightly to the right. The legs are attached to the pelvis, so if the pelvis starts facing perpendicular to our view and the left side of the pelvis moves forward, we should be able to see the left leg peeking out. If the pelvis remained perpendicular in the image, then one would be able to argue that the lumbar spine is rotated to the right instead, which would make it more anatomically plausible.
Can someone give detailed feedback on why was this rejected?
MF144 said:
Can someone give detailed feedback on why was this rejected? post #8602380
Not an approver, but her toes and especially the fingers on her right hand look off. I'd guess it was the latter. Shame, that's a cool dress.
ignoble said:
Not an approver, but her toes and especially the fingers on her right hand look off. I'd guess it was the latter. Shame, that's a cool dress.
I see.
What about this one?
Only 4 approvers checked this.
Hi, any feedback on why these posts weren't approved? Please give a second chance.
post #8684473
post #6359202
post #6613086
MF144 said:
I see.
What about this one?
I would assume it's because of her right leg being off-portioned to her left one (at least from what I can see).
Seriously? All hendra's works have exaclty the same quality.
How is post #8686417 different from post #8672256 post #8676610 or post #8680752
Thanks
Updated
I'm not really sure why this post wasn't approved:
post #8627945
Is there a meaningful difference in quality/other from other nude+multiple_views posts like the following which were approved?
post #8617838
post #8574887
Additionally, not sure why this one wasn't approved, which IMO is higher quality, isn't explicit, and is inherently 'on-topic':
post #8675628
Any feedback would be helpful on selecting better uploads in the future.
Updated
WoodyTheFemboy said:
Why were these rejected?
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8665119?q=status%3Adeleted+user%3AWoodyTheFemboy
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8665111?q=parent%3A8665111
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8587271?q=status%3Adeleted+user%3AWoodyTheFemboy
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8551688?q=status%3Adeleted+user%3AWoodyTheFemboy
Repeating again
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8686678?q=status%3Adeleted+user%3AAlto1867
...............
.....please ?!! 👉👈
post #8685137
Can I get an explanation? Also post #8685205 appears jn my deleted log if it is deleted can I also have an explanation?
I tried bringing up post #8465789 here because from my point of view I don’t quite see any instant dealbreakers here before, and indeed it was appealed again after I brought it up here then after my first appeal failed, but it still didn't get approved.
NoIdea4GoodName said:
I would assume it's because of her right leg being off-portioned to her left one (at least from what I can see).
I see
Anyone wanna give feedback for the is?