nonamethanks said:
Ok, hold up, I've been approving these on autopilot, but should we really be using an umbrella tag? These characters all look different, they're more like different roles than different skins/personas. We don't have an umbrella tag for vtubers that completely change character, like dokibird (vtuber) vs selen tatsuki, so why would we have an umbrella character tag for all the characters in post #7378255 and post #7338641? Is this just a proxy for an umbrella copytag?
I suppose this does kind of function as a proxy umbrella copytag now. When I started these implications, the usage was wildly inconsistent, both in terms of character tags and copyright tags, meaning you had to make a search consisting of multiple (5+) copy- and chartags to find what ado_(utaite) does now. If I recall correctly, these implications follow from how a majority of posts were tagged.
Related to topic #25915, the agency tag Cloud Nine Inc was created (also because Yoshino falls under that), but a consensus wasn't really reached on whether to use this as an umbrella copytag or not. Theoretically, if that were done, these implications wouldn't really be necessary. However, this would put the Ado (utaite) tag in a kind of weird state where it's only applied to characters with definitive designs but with no name (like with Gira Gira currently).
I think naming these characters could be managed. The community seems to generally lean towards <song name>-chan
or <song name>-san
, so Odo-chan for Odo for example. This was also what was done with Akuru-chan.
This, along with her default avatar now having a chartag (Chando (ado)) would put the Ado (utaite) tag in a weird state where it's kind of just obseolete, but having "all Ado-related posts" not be findable under something to do with "Ado" doesn't feel right. Would we make it a copytag subtag under Cloud Nine Inc (wouldn't worse since it's too large of a percentage of all posts)? Or do we nuke it and turn it into a utility alias for Cloud Nine Inc, and let the *_(ado)
qualifiers handle the rest of searchability?
Like I mentioned, I mostly made these implications to at least make the usage consistent, but I'm defininitely open to changes since even I at times question whether it *really* makes sense.