Diet_Soda said:
kinoshita ringo (ryve5758)
Unsure about the degree of human involvement here.
Painted over AI. Some images have the upscaled base image visible. Also loads of grain to cover artifacts and blurriness.
Posted under General
Diet_Soda said:
kinoshita ringo (ryve5758)
Unsure about the degree of human involvement here.
Painted over AI. Some images have the upscaled base image visible. Also loads of grain to cover artifacts and blurriness.
Marlor said:
sadly https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts?tags=bluefield&z=1 all the latest posts look at least "assisted" and there're no tags...
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6074578?q=bluefield or something in this period is probably the last human work
Yeah, I talked about this artist earlier, having the same thoughts.
A few of this artist's more recent works seem a bit iffy to me https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts?tags=sama_%28sama24654684%29&z=1
post #6238192 The hair looks melty, the ribbon on her right hip seems out of place, and the lower half of the dress looks off
post #6359138 the face of the watch on their left wrist looks melty. They also confusingly appear to have a watch strap on the other wrist as well, and the pendant at their throat looks odd.
post #6373567 The hair decoration looks like a jumbled mess
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6658792
Flagged with no evidence. No one seemed to care upon appeal. I think it's rather obvious that this isn't AI.
Hereinafter said:
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6658792
Flagged with no evidence. No one seemed to care upon appeal. I think it's rather obvious that this isn't AI.
For reference: forum #254158
VR-Man said:
Looks like various filters and distortions applied to an upscaled AI image. The eyes especially have strong upscaling artifacts.
Updated
Hereinafter said:
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6658792
Flagged with no evidence. No one seemed to care upon appeal. I think it's rather obvious that this isn't AI.
Appealed it for you.
post #6770301 its a obvious use of ai then a missed finger and a "poor collarbone and breast" isn't a prove isn't a full ai work the post has enough corrections to can be call ai-assisted if we check other works had same problems and nobody says nothing.
By the way we have a problem whit ai-assisted when you see this post #6720714 is same a ai-base with really enough corrections to be ai-assisted and still deleted there are ai-assisted works with less "human work"
Hereinafter said:
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6658792
Flagged with no evidence. No one seemed to care upon appeal. I think it's rather obvious that this isn't AI.
Well, the latest update is someone insisted this is AI for whatever reason.
I share your opinion on this picture, and have no words at this point.
Imagine_Breaker said:
post #6770301 its a obvious use of ai then a missed finger and a "poor collarbone and breast" isn't a prove isn't a full ai work the post has enough corrections to can be call ai-assisted if we check other works had same problems and nobody says nothing.
By the way we have a problem whit ai-assisted when you see this post #6720714 is same a ai-base with really enough corrections to be ai-assisted and still deleted there are ai-assisted works with less "human work"
This "artist" is an AI "artist" with low edit. There's nothing to prove here.
Imagine_Breaker said:
if we check other works had same problems and nobody says nothing.
Just say it yourself.
post #6617015
post #6147489
post #6147474
Three active posts with ai-generated. I think these are probably mistags (though the latter two are from an ai-assisted series), but I'm not experienced in identifying AI so I'm placing them here just in case.
Blank_User said:
post #6617015
post #6147489
post #6147474
Three active posts with ai-generated. I think these are probably mistags (though the latter two are from an ai-assisted series), but I'm not experienced in identifying AI so I'm placing them here just in case.
post #6617015 seems amateurishly painted over AI, so ai-assisted, IMO.
The other two are probably mistags, consindering that the uploader added both tags at upload time.
kittey said:
post #6617015 seems amateurishly painted over AI, so ai-assisted, IMO.
I don't see much difference between this post and the others from shidas0459 (26 posts total). If that one is ai-assisted, the others should probably be looked at as well.
Looks AI-generated.
I don't think this is fully AI-generated but more AI-assisted.
123kid said:
I don't think this is fully AI-generated but more AI-assisted.
Almost entirely AI-gen, only minor cleanup on the subject. Most human work was cleaning up the background and even that is about 50% AI.
Nameless_Contributor said:
Almost entirely AI-gen, only minor cleanup on the subject. Most human work was cleaning up the background and even that is about 50% AI.
Then how do you tell that the the works that got posted after this one are only assisted? I don't see much difference there.