Donmai

AI-generated art check thread

Posted under General

Diet Soda

Sobered_Beaver said:

post #6690150

is it bad enough to warrant ai-generated or just on the edge case of ai-assisted ?
Some findings from that post:
- badly drawn lines
- hair cuts off the neck
- visible edits on hands and eyes
- badly placed trinity logo on the shoulder

I'd say the former, considering the sheer absurdity of the background desks. That artist's whole gallery should probably get a second look.

Reply
123kid

Looks AI generated with just some poor touch ups from the artist. The way the hair just melt together with the ears makes it obvious imo. The sunglasses and the fading bikini on the Anis picture are also giving it away.

Reply
MysteriousLounger

I'd like feedback on post #6759328. it has weird toes and hands, but otherwise looks quite good. It seems to me that it might be an example of really good up-scaling and inpainting work. Zooming in on the hair, the lines have that "mushiness" to them, which seems very typical of the AI. The eyes look like a typical example of high-res inpainting. I'm around 90% confident it's AI but I'd like someone to take a second look :)

Reply
MysteriousLounger

MysteriousLounger said:

I'd like feedback on post #6759328. it has weird toes and hands, but otherwise looks quite good. It seems to me that it might be an example of really good up-scaling and inpainting work. Zooming in on the hair, the lines have that "mushiness" to them, which seems very typical of the AI. The eyes look like a typical example of high-res inpainting. I'm around 90% confident it's AI but I'd like someone to take a second look :)

Additional context that I just found out: the artist has several of their previous works tagged as AI-assisted. However, those have the hands looking much better, just seem to have had more effort gone into them. so with this additional context I'm basically 100 percent certain this was made with AI, and whether it deserves "assisted" or "generated" status is basically up to interpretation. As such I'm going to flag it because I think if they can't be bothered to fix hands and feet, it doesn't deserve to be called "assisted".

Reply
Super Affection

Sol_Coolguy said:

https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6750323
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6763311
Seems to be AI-generated or AI-assisted.

I'd say so.
First one is ridiculous with her left "arm" bending backwards and the top and then re-emerging as a mutation of her torso at the bottom. I wouldn't even consider assisted for that one.
Second one is more passable but the shit her hair is doing, particularly around her arm but also in general, does not look drawn. I also can't see any reason for the weird indent in one of the eyes.

Reply
kittey

ion288 said:

post #6563348

Flag without a tag. Also an invalid flag but thats an other topic.

It’s definitely AI-assisted. There are areas where the original upscaled image is still visible, such as the “sunny” area on Seele’s hair in the top center of the image. Hands and ears are kinda meh and the lockers in the background are complete nonsense. The bras(?) in the parent image are also painted on top of everything else with fixes to the surrounding areas, which wouldn’t be the case if the image had proper layers.

Updated

Reply
1 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 118