If the lossy-lossless look different to you that's a problem on your end. They are pixel-perfect matches (I checked again to be 100% sure) so there is no difference apart from the file format.
If the lossy-lossless look different to you that's a problem on your end. They are pixel-perfect matches (I checked again to be 100% sure) so there is no difference apart from the file format.
Duplicatebooru says they're the same, as does Geeqie. Any difference in color profile is an alteration of the original resulting from the user copy-pasting the pixel data from their browser to upload the image instead of giving the Twitter link to Danbooru (this mistake was discussed on Discord).
Any difference in color profile is an alteration of the original resulting from the user copy-pasting the pixel data from their browser to upload the image instead of giving the Twitter link to Danbooru (this mistake was discussed on Discord).
You should've said that when you posted the request. I replaced it now. Also for future reference, duplicatebooru can't handle different color profiles, so don't trust it too much for niche cases like these.
You should've said that when you posted the request. I replaced it now. Also for future reference, duplicatebooru can't handle different color profiles, so don't trust it too much for niche cases like these.
Any difference in color profile is an alteration of the original resulting from the user copy-pasting the pixel data from their browser to upload the image instead of giving the Twitter link to Danbooru (this mistake was discussed on Discord).
post #6173246 is a similar case (same uploader, uploader's response for reference); I admit I only checked the current file and the replacement with identify -format '%#\n' which does seem to ignore color profiles.
