Unsure if this'll go through, but won't hurt giving it a shot. Essentially, all three of those posts were uploaded via Wayback Machine, because that was the only source left at that time - the artist has a habit of regularly nuking their stuff off Twitter. ***It was a third-party source, and one that only contained a sample***. However, the artist finally posted the comic onto their Pixiv, which is a significantly better resolution. But still, dunno if a Twitter-ish third party source is acceptable to be changed into a first party Pixiv one.
Unsure if this'll go through, but won't hurt giving it a shot. Essentially, all three of those posts were uploaded via Wayback Machine, because that was the only source left at that time - the artist has a habit of regularly nuking their stuff off Twitter. ***It was a third-party source, and one that only contained a sample***. However, the artist finally posted the comic onto their Pixiv, which is a significantly better resolution. But still, dunno if a Twitter-ish third party source is acceptable to be changed into a first party Pixiv one.
I don't consider an archived first-party source sufficiently third-party for replacement purposes. The correct move is probably to reupload and flag those for deletion.
Is there anything wrong with forum #233174, forum #231286 or forum #232269? Webp-to-png conversions from forum #232269 have been replaced with webps but the webps are still samples; both webp and png versions are hosted on the same site and look the same aside from compression artifacts.
Is there anything wrong with forum #233174, forum #231286 or forum #232269? Webp-to-png conversions from forum #232269 have been replaced with webps but the webps are still samples; both webp and png versions are hosted on the same site and look the same aside from compression artifacts.
If you make a bunch of requests and I notice an obvious difference in one, all of the requests are suspect. Perhaps another mod will have more patience.
If you make a bunch of requests and I notice an obvious difference in one, all of the requests are suspect. Perhaps another mod will have more patience.
Alright, in case anyone else feels like replacing these I've rechecked them all. Last two images from forum #232269 were modified at the source shortly¹ after I'd posted in the thread. Same applies to post #6054851, edit timestamp from the API response is Mon Feb 20 16:56:05 +0800 2023 which is a week after the replacement request was made. I've included previous versions of the images in the original requests. The replacement for post #163495 appears slightly darker in some viewers but the pixel data for both images is the same aside from barely visible second-generation artifacts; gamma/chromaticity metadata present in the replacement PNG might've been omitted during JPEG conversion.
¹: Last-Modified for the last 2 images: Wed, 01 Feb 2023 07:05:28 GMTWed, 01 Feb 2023 07:06:57 GMT, creation date of the forum post: Wed, 01 Feb 2023 06:49:44 GMT
