post #5384760
What do the mods want from me?
Posted under General
post #5384760
What do the mods want from me?
JApple said:
Why wasn’t post #5341420 approved? Is there something wrong with it? Other illustrations by the same artist have.
It is because people don’t like it? Why no like it?
All images are judged on their own. It's noticeably more rough that the artist's other works, with an odd head shape.
retrospectrum said:
what exactly is wrong with this one?
post #5349528
post #5291002
The first one is nice in the coloring and shading, but it's got a bad three-point twist. Chest facing forward, head twisted a little further, but then pelvis off tot he side, rotated, and on the side?
Ass & Tits poses tend to be wrong than they are right.
The second, there's some odd anatomy that doesn't look right when you, well, look.
punished_K said:
post #5362304 / post #5362305
post #5362295
post #5374982
post #5375959
post #5378778Feedback appreciated.
Weirdly flat shading that makes the flat profile look extra-flat.
Again, just general weak.
...
The forced perspective makes her look like she has a giant head. Also that anus is... I can't say if it's anatomically accurate I'm not a doctor but man is it scary to look at.
Her neck seems offset and it's really weird that everything except the boob itself has detailed directional lighting.
bobibuddy said:
Unsure why this was deleted/unapproved, feedback is appreciated.
Extreme fetish content will always have a somewhat harder time getting approved. That aside, she's got a really strange neck.
punished_K said:
pool #18782
First 3 images are the best-received in the set, yet not approved?pool #18719
2 deleted yet same quality as everything else.Make it make sense.
Stop judging based on score. It's not unusual for the first results of a pool to the best received. That's normal for any image set.
IMO, the best way to make these "make sense" would be to flag and delete most of the first set. They're not actually that good.
The second set? The Mars/Jupiter one just has some really confusing angles and a bad neck.
punished_K said:
I don't even know anymore.
Second-highest post for order:score status:deleted too.
You've been here long enough to know that:
1) Score has no bearing on approvals.
2) Most high-scoring posts are just porn, making score even more irrelevant when talking about a LoL porn animation.
punished_K said:
post #5384760
What do the mods want from me?
I'm not a mod just an approver, but I can tell you I want to see better anatomy. And for you to fap before uploading.
KagayakuShiningGate said:
In the first one's case, maybe the style's too western? Idk, these seem pretty solid to me.
KagayakuShiningGate said:
Maybe the artstyle was too western? They seem pretty solid, otherwise.
Hey, I get you're trying to help but comments like this are what caused a whole fiasco a while back. The "I dunno maybe?" responses can cause a lot of confusion.
Simply put:
If you don't know, you don't need to speculate.
magcolo said:
What is the preferred source if two (official) sources of the same image seem to have the same resolution? Usually a Twitter vs Pixiv. Or how do we know if one's resolution is slightly better if they're close?
Not really the place for this question, but alright:
If they're the same resolution, make to check the filesize and go with the bigger one. Twitter sometimes has the same resolution but noticeable artifacting. If there's genuinely no difference, I go with the one with a more relevant commentary, but at that point it doesn't really matter.
post #5379678
This isn't approved, because the source is not from the author, but from a manga information account?
Yangbojian said:
post #5379678
This isn't approved, because the source is not from the author, but from a manga information account?
The art doesn't have much details, both element-wise and coloring-wise, which might appear less interesting for viewers.
Either way, if the information account is official, tag second-party source, if it's an unofficial repost tag third-party source.
post #5397636
Why this one isn't approved?
vivoleko01 said:
post #5397636
Why this one isn't approved?
Overall poor anatomy and bad proportion. Especially the girls on the right side and the middle one on the left.
post #5388144
Hello! I'm wondering why this post wasn't approved, I don't see any problems with it.
Diblox said:
post #5388144
Hello! I'm wondering why this post wasn't approved, I don't see any problems with it.
There're enough minor errors and glitches scattered throughout that it adds up. Tiny hands, weak water interaction, questionable neck and shoulders, weird head shape, face slightly too wide, weak hair shading past the ties, general shading weirdness.
None of these things on their own would get the image deleted. Heck, half of them together probably wouldn't. But all together? Eh.
I felt pretty confident with post #5369993. What did I miss?
Edit: Thanks for the feedback, Veradux.
Updated
Omo_Fan said:
I felt pretty confident with post #5369993. What did I miss?
Very weak shading and just generally not great. The underlying linework is fine, it's just overall not up to par for Danbooru.
post #5389200
post #5405384
Excuse me. May I ask why these posts got deleted.
Thanks.
SWA_YAMAYURI said:
post #5389200
post #5405384
Excuse me. May I ask why these posts got deleted.
Thanks.
First one's got an overly short torso and legs appearing outta nowhere, along with issues with the arm on the left side of the image.
The second is way more solid, but the expression is a little derpy and the style might be just a bit too western.
KagayakuShiningGate said:
First one's got an overly short torso and legs appearing outta nowhere, along with issues with the arm on the left side of the image.
The second is way more solid, but the expression is a little derpy and the style might be just a bit too western.
Thanks!
Narrator-1 said:
a rather simple shading and general lack of details/visual elements.
Hello, I am wondering why my work is considered to be of poor quality.
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/5406609
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/5406622
ENFYumi said:
Hello, I am wondering why my work is considered to be of poor quality.
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/5406609
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/5406622
Danbooru is not the place for Koikatsu (or any other game) screencap uploads.
Hey. I'd like to know why the following posts I made were considered low quality.
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/5412970
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/5412974
Giga_Skunk said:
Hey. I'd like to know why the following posts I made were considered low quality.
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/5412970
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/5412974
The first three has rather rough linework, poor shading and bad hands. In the last one the guy has a disturbing stomach anatomy where it turns into his dick like a trunk. Unfortunate since it is otherwise rather well made.
