Donmai

Upload Feedback Thread - post here if your uploads keep getting deleted

Posted under General

uqino said:

I would say it was as flat as (explicit) https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/97235523 but the latter got approved anyway

And? All images are judged in isolation.
Plus, those images aren't uploaded.
Further, that artist hasn't had an image approved in nearly half a year. A third of images from that artist are uploaded by a single unrestricted user and over 70/90 images never touched the queue.

ILikeBuffGirls123 said:

I can't say I agree with the third one, if anything it's just as good as the first one (as it is the same artist). Regardless, it is subjective, so thanks for undeleting them anyway!

This just goes to show that we approvers are a group of individuals, not a hivemind. Contrary to the accusations.

I think the second image isn't approvable, as her torso proportions are kinda funky even for a bodybuilder, but I think the first and third are.

Mysticus said:

What's wrong with them?

post #5281783
post #5287924

IDK about the first one but the second image ... her lower body looks too thicc/wide. It looks disproportionate to me.

edit: actually looking at the first one again. Her legs look odd. Like her left leg is oddly going into her right? but that would just be my guess

Updated

post #4446178 - no idea what's wrong here
post #5241576 - I can only see one small mistake with the hair
post #5285248 - seems to be about the same quality as other stuff from this artist
post #5290320 - only image from the set I uploaded from this artist that got deleted
post #5290490 - again...only image from this artist I uploaded that got deleted, seems to be about the same quality as the rest....yes the breasts are ridiculous but in line with the character displayed
post #5294754 - same as above i guess

any feedback would be appreciated

g3gen said:

Can post #5075585 be checked again? It's a nude variant of an already approved post. There should not be any quality issues with it.

Why is she wet in the nude one, lol? Anyway probably just try and appeal it. Honestly, some approvers just don't like nsfw stuff so it's harder to get that approved.

OmegaStarNeo said:

post #5293327

Where did I go wrong this time?

Amateurish faces, hands, proportions, overall just really not good

Erytropus said:
...
any feedback would be appreciated

In general, please keep in mind that each post is approved on its own merits, whether or not the artist usually gets approved is irrelevant.
post #4446178 - not bad but it's weird pixelated 3d animation that I don't really know what to make of, and the lazy background doesn't help
post #5241576 - I think it's fine, I've undeleted it
post #5285248 - I really don't like her face, it's kinda unsettling. Plus the foot seems badly placed
post #5290320 - horribly broken spine
post #5290490 - our current approvers are generally not fans of ridiculous breasts. Face is a little derpy too
post #5294754 - Satsuki's face at the top looks bad, and I'm not a fan of how the breasts are folding around Ryuuko's fingers, that looks strange to me

Runty said:

post #5297197

Bad spine?

Yep

Nyami said:

post #5296455
post #5271763
post #5296474
i don't see the bad quality in these images

It has been explained to you multiple times in this thread that Danbooru is primarily for anime-style art and that the stuff you are posting is essentially off-topic. Those images are just not what this website is for.

g3gen said:

Can post #5075585 be checked again? It's a nude variant of an already approved post. There should not be any quality issues with it.

The water and shadows turned me off at first glance, but yeah I think its fine. Undeleted. Though keep in mind that nude variants can be worse than the clothed version if it exposes weaknesses in the anatomy or the artist fucks up the nipple placement, etc.

1123581321345589144 said:

post #5301629

I don't even know what to say, I see no issues with it. It's cute, drawn decently, correct proportions, decently liked by non-approvers. Was only reviewed by seven people.

Enormous knees. And the arms are off, too

SWA_YAMAYURI said:

post #5304043
Excuse me. May I feedback this post that parent has been approved. But I have no idea why it got deleted.
Thanks.

Explicit fetishy art will always be harder to get approved. Many approvers (including myself) are gonna pretty quickly disapprove a foot focus image where the feet are covered in cum, without looking too carefully at the overall quality. Otherwise, the arms seem a bit too narrow and the forehead is enormous even by anime standards.

CormacM said:

Explicit fetishy art will always be harder to get approved. Many approvers (including myself) are gonna pretty quickly disapprove a foot focus image where the feet are covered in cum, without looking too carefully at the overall quality. Otherwise, the arms seem a bit too narrow and the forehead is enormous even by anime standards.

Thanks for your advice. I'll pay more attention to that.

1123581321345589144 said:

Thanks for the feedback.

I agree it's not 100% perfect, but it's not that bad. Certainly not "enormous" considering foreshortening.

I can't help but feel like restricted uploaders are held to much higher standards.

well the reality is ... we are. An approver can reject a post for any reason. The feet can be wonky, the perspective can look slightly off just to name a few and you can look at an unrestricted post and go ... "this will never pass the queue in a million years" and even then when you flag it may even still somehow survive.