Cup_udon? Though to be honest I don't see why they shouldn't be tagged instant_udon as well.
The rule in the instant_ramen wiki about not using it for cup_ramen is kind of dumb, and I'd much prefer to treat cup ramen as a subset. That wiki was written by a user with zero forum activity and very few contributions to date, so I don't regard it as authoritative. Judging by the results of a cup_ramen instant_ramen search, a lot of taggers simply disregard this rule anyway, so there's an argument to be made for doing away with it altogether.
The only past forum discussion I've seen on the subject of instant noodles was topic #4920, and that mostly pertained to the problem of implicating ramen when you can't see the contents of the cup, so we don't really have any precedent to go by here.
Tagging arthropod_girl just because a girl has antennae is like tagging elf just because she has pointy ears, or tagging vampire just because she has fangs. I'm very much against tagging arthropod_girl on drawings of Wriggle when she's basically a human whose only insectile feature looks like it's being worn as an accessory. Save that tag for images with something more, like post #4913685.
Should posts where present characters appear in multiple series and the artwork is clearly about one specific, contain all the copyright tags regardless? The Fate franchise is an example, sometimes I want to search for the copyright to find specific Koha-ace, CCC or Stay Night art, but I find Grand Order or other stuff.
Bump. In addition, you don't tag all three Fate routes on posts with the characters of the fifth holy grail war. If you search for Heaven's Feel, you find Heaven's Feel art, same should happen with the rest of the franchise. Also, the Fate (series) tag serves as an umbrella, same as Artoria Pendragon does.
But I want to see opinions from others before doing anything major and messaging people adding the unrelated copyright tags.
post #5032649 - Think it's a dildo based on the pixiv gallery tags, another image in the gallery, and the color of the "dick." It's tricky because judging based on other images in the same gallery isn't very relevant for tagging what you see but the dick is a very different shade of skin tone BUT that's not uncommon to see.
The rule in the instant_ramen wiki about not using it for cup_ramen is kind of dumb, and I'd much prefer to treat cup ramen as a subset. That wiki was written by a user with zero forum activity and very few contributions to date, so I don't regard it as authoritative. Judging by the results of a cup_ramen instant_ramen search, a lot of taggers simply disregard this rule anyway, so there's an argument to be made for doing away with it altogether.
I agree with you. I checked the search results for instant_ramen and found 90% of them are cup ramens. Moreover, 60% of them were not tagged as cup_ramen. I wonder if we need cup_ramen tag...
Is there a tag for when a bandana is being worn like that? It's basically being worn like a hairband (or sometimes more like a headband) with a bow-like knot tied in it.
Commentary says she's a fawn/deer, but she's exactly like a centaur. I'm not sure if I should use centaur and the horse tags. For now I tagged centaur anyway, but with deer ears and deer tail.
Edit: I didn't want to take the artist at their word, she seemed more like a horse than a deer to me, but someone added centauroid, gotta go with the commentary then.
Commentary says she's a fawn/deer, but she's exactly like a centaur. I'm not sure if I should use centaur and the horse tags. For now I tagged centaur anyway, but with deer ears and deer tail.
There’s centauroid for anything like a centaur but not a centaur.
