Donmai

Proposal: Removing unnecessary Genshin qualifiers

Posted under Tags

.Dank said:

As far as I know, there is no way to pull a list of all related tags belonging to a copyright. If you can show me this then I guess you are right.

You can use this page but it's based on tagged posts so as you can see it also pulls characters from other copyrights.

blindVigil said:

If you search *(genshin_impact) you'll get every single tag that ends with that qualifier. Similarly, mona_* returns every tag that starts with "mona_"

Indeed, all I meant was that all tags of character:*(genshin_impact) should inherently contain copyright:genshin impact, so the former is redundant.

.Dank said:

As far as I know, there is no way to pull a list of all related tags belonging to a copyright. If you can show me this then I guess you are right.

Well now we're on to something! Maybe this isn't a problem with tags after all, and is actually a problem with the availability of database queries.

If there were a form that allowed something like:

"SELECT tags from "character", ORDER BY number of tags, WHERE "copyright" contains "genshin impact"

would you have what you need?

Why not ask the admins whether or not this is feasible? To be honest, it sounds so useful and fun that I'd be surprised if it hadn't been considered already. If it's an expensive operation, maybe it could be limited to builder+? I cry with envy, but if it's for the good of the site...

nonamethanks said:

You can use this page but it's based on tagged posts so as you can see it also pulls characters from other copyrights.

You have to add a limit to it? I figured it would just spew out as much as it could without a limit set. without one I get much less lol.

Yeah I saw some link and astolfo (fate) in there too and others haha.

My main complaints about having qualifiers for characters that don't need them:

  • Qualifiers should only be used if the character shares a name with a different character. Other than that, there are already systems in place to deal with precision tagging.
  • Useless qualifiers provide information that the copyright tag itself already provides. If you have no idea what copyright a character is from, click on nearly any image with that character tagged and the copyright will be there. If a copyright gets large enough that a character list wiki page is needed, then make one.
  • This is bad standard going forward. This would mean every character from here on out, regardless how unique their name is, would need qualifiers. And if you want to keep this consistent, every character on the history of danbooru would need a qualifier. I do not look forward to updating hundreds of thousands of images so all the characters on this site have a qualifier. We sometimes have this idea that something being more precise automatically makes it better. But when there was the discussion of Touhou -> Touhou_Project, its official name, it was shot down, because everyone can understand that Touhou is Touhou Project. Precision should not trump the common usage.
  • Qualifiers in recent years became prevalent with the wave of gachas, where the characters have multiple forms like in FGO or are named after real things like Kancolle, Azur, and GF. In these cases, qualifiers were needed to distinguish the ship from the shipgirl or whatever Fate is doing. Extending qualifiers to characters with unambiguous names does not make sense. Blindly following what the current popular tags are doing is not a valid strategy for tagging.
  • These qualifiers are useless precision for characters that have no ambiguity about their name. Adding _(copyrightname) to a character makes it more precise sure, but unless the character is ambiguous, no one says this. If I want to talk about Ayanami from that one shipgirl gacha, I need to specify Azur or Kancolle. If I want to talk about Koakuma, that shouldn't need a qualifier. If I want to talk about Edward Elric, that shouldn't need a qualifier. No matter how obscure the copyright is, if the name is unique, there should not be a qualifier.
  • Adding qualifiers to unambiguous names is a bad solution to a problem that was solved years ago. We have a solution, the wiki. Yes, there are times where people don't read the wiki. And some characters don't have wikis at all. And that's why the Wiki Request Thread (topic #12858) exists. Most of the time, if the character just has a single sentence in their wiki page about their copyright is enough. If all else fails and no one on this site knows who this character is, just google the character name and the copyright there will be a Fandom wiki page that someone worked on years ago that we can just use.
  • This one is personal, but these extended tags look awful on the sidebar. The + - buttons usually push the qualified name onto a second line, and make the tag list "longer". This one is a minor point though.
  • IF on the off chance that one day in the future a character from a different copyright shares the same name as these characters, then just update the tag. We aren't dealing with the second law of thermodynamics here, we can change the tag at a later date. It is not as if once these characters get stripped of their qualifier now they can never have it again.

tl;dr: Unique, unambiguous tags should not get qualifiers because we already have solutions in the forms of the wiki and sets a useless standard that would require massive retagging for the sake of "precision".

Because the fact that I've proposed multiple BURs that are basically the opposite of one other and that are inconsistent with suggestions I made in forum #180964 might seem weird and incoherent, I should state my own stance.

When it comes to tags, I personally value internal consistency (in the sense of having consistent rules and policies in how we name and apply tags) over most appearance/usability concerns. As I see it, there are two ways we can handle qualifiers consistently on a per-copyright basis:

  • #1: We use qualifiers for every character in a copyright when a significant amount of associated characters or tags require them (a preference expressed by evazion in forum #180324)
  • #2: We use qualifiers only when they are necessary to disambiguate a tag, or when it seems extremely likely that we will need to do so in the future (more common on Danbooru in general)

In topic #18046, I suggested #1 based on evazion's statements in the forum post I linked and the BUR that was approved in the same thread. It attracted quite a lot of downvotes and no one higher in the hierarchy stepped in to advocate for it, so I withdrew it after figuring it wouldn't be approved. Now I'm suggesting #2, because that's the other way to make Genshin qualifiers logical in some fashion. If #2 is also voted down and goes unapproved, then I think we should go back and should do #1 after all (though I'm not going to submit any more BURs about it, because that would just be obnoxious of me.)

I see no merit in the status quo, which seems to me like "most Genshin character tags are qualified, but some random ones are not, based on the whim of the first person to use them and whether they were included in one of the earlier incomplete BURs vaguely moving us towards #1."

Updated

thelieutenant said:

My main complaints about having qualifiers for characters that don't need them:

  • Qualifiers should only be used if the character shares a name with a different character. Other than that, there are already systems in place to deal with precision tagging.

Playing whack-a-mole with old character tags whenever a new character tag makes them ambiguous is a much worse solution than future-proofing it so that such a task is unnecessary. It is far, far easier to simply add character qualifiers from the beginning than perform a song and dance on the forums for every new copyright over which characters should and shouldn't receive a qualifier (unless, of course, all or a majority of the characters have very unique names). This is especially true when more than half of the characters for a copyright need qualifiers while at the same time there are arguments that the rest of the characters do not.

  • Useless qualifiers provide information that the copyright tag itself already provides. If you have no idea what copyright a character is from, click on nearly any image with that character tagged and the copyright will be there. If a copyright gets large enough that a character list wiki page is needed, then make one.

What you refer to as "useless" qualifiers do not actually cause any real problems. They do, however, offer consistency with the rest of a series' character tags. I have seen the argument in this thread that something like cryogunner_legionnaire_(genshin_impact) is more annoying to type out, but this reasoning falls flat even for the example that was given - typing "cryog" almost immediately brings up cryogunner_legionnaire_(genshin_impact) in the autocomplete.

Additionally, when only half or less of the characters from a copyright are unqualified, it can give the appearance that they do not actually belong to said copyright because of the lack of consistency in the taglist with all the other qualified character tags. Eliminating this potential confusion for those unfamiliar with a series is, in my opinion, a valid reason to support qualifiers.

  • This is bad standard going forward. This would mean every character from here on out, regardless how unique their name is, would need qualifiers. And if you want to keep this consistent, every character on the history of danbooru would need a qualifier. I do not look forward to updating hundreds of thousands of images so all the characters on this site have a qualifier. We sometimes have this idea that something being more precise automatically makes it better. But when there was the discussion of Touhou -> Touhou_Project, its official name, it was shot down, because everyone can understand that Touhou is Touhou Project. Precision should not trump the common usage.

I don't think anyone arguing in favor of qualifiers would agree with this; it is a rather sweeping statement that is both unrealistic and a bad idea. If most of a copyright's character tags are unique enough then yes, there is little point in adding qualifiers as there is a very low chance that they will become ambiguous in the future. As for updating every existing unqualified character tag on Danbooru, nobody is arguing for this. Besides the main reason of disambiguation, another key point of qualifiers is to reduce the amount of work that needs to be done in order to achieve said disambiguation - if a series already has qualified characters, then there is no work to do when a new character with an identical name pops up elsewhere. It would be contradictory to that goal to embark on some massive, months-long quest to qualify every single existing character tag to avoid the extra keystrokes required if some new copyright is crazy enough to create their own character called "Remilia Scarlet".

As a side note, the touhou -> touhou_project alias proposal was not about being more "precise" but rather about being more "correct", as technically the copyright's full name is "Touhou Project". It was rejected mainly because it was such a massive and engrained tag that A) other areas of Danbooru (and other boorus entirely) would have required serious cleanup in the wake of the alias, and B) most people didn't like the idea of changing a 16-year-old tag, one of the oldest and largest copyright tags on the site, just to be "technically correct". If the series wasn't the titan that it is today, I would not have been surprised if that alias had been approved.

  • Qualifiers in recent years became prevalent with the wave of gachas, where the characters have multiple forms like in FGO or are named after real things like Kancolle, Azur, and GF. In these cases, qualifiers were needed to distinguish the ship from the shipgirl or whatever Fate is doing. Extending qualifiers to characters with unambiguous names does not make sense. Blindly following what the current popular tags are doing is not a valid strategy for tagging.

Again, this is not why people are in favor of qualifiers. Nobody is arguing for this, especially not for Fate. At this point, it is a universally accepted truth that Fate tags are an ungodly mess and should not be looked to for guidance in any regard whatsoever, lest you bring the thunderous wrath of albert down upon thine head.

  • These qualifiers are useless precision for characters that have no ambiguity about their name. Adding _(copyrightname) to a character makes it more precise sure, but unless the character is ambiguous, no one says this. If I want to talk about Ayanami from that one shipgirl gacha, I need to specify Azur or Kancolle. If I want to talk about Koakuma, that shouldn't need a qualifier. If I want to talk about Edward Elric, that shouldn't need a qualifier. No matter how obscure the copyright is, if the name is unique, there should not be a qualifier.

Qualifiers should not be used because of a copyright's obscurity. They should be used because of a character tag's potential or actual ambiguity, or to provide consistency. Edward Elric might not need a qualifier, but if he were just Edward then he certainly would. Similarly, if we have only a single post from a copyright containing a character called "Edward von Farsightedness III", the fact that there is only a single post from that copyright has no bearing on if its characters need qualifiers. "Edward von Farsightedness III" is incredibly unique and as such would not need a qualifier.

  • Adding qualifiers to unambiguous names is a bad solution to a problem that was solved years ago. We have a solution, the wiki. Yes, there are times where people don't read the wiki. And some characters don't have wikis at all. And that's why the Wiki Request Thread (topic #12858) exists. Most of the time, if the character just has a single sentence in their wiki page about their copyright is enough. If all else fails and no one on this site knows who this character is, just google the character name and the copyright there will be a Fandom wiki page that someone worked on years ago that we can just use.

Yes, there are times where people don't read the wiki.

I don't think you understand just how prevalent this problem actually is. Compared to the entire userbase, it's really only active contributors who read/write wikis (and even then not all of them actually do) - I would be surprised if even half of the users who only use Danbooru to browse/favorite posts even know of the wiki's existence. It is much easier for the average user's accessibility to have the copyright's name attached directly to the character tag rather than to have them to go to the character's wiki to figure out where they're from.

  • This one is personal, but these extended tags look awful on the sidebar. The + - buttons usually push the qualified name onto a second line, and make the tag list "longer". This one is a minor point though.

I would argue it actually looks worse, especially in the taglist when only half or less of a copyright's characters are unqualified. You end up with qualifiers randomly peppered in there and it just looks messy. At that point we might as well just qualify them all.

  • IF on the off chance that one day in the future a character from a different copyright shares the same name as these characters, then just update the tag. We aren't dealing with the second law of thermodynamics here, we can change the tag at a later date. It is not as if once these characters get stripped of their qualifier now they can never have it again.

For the same reasons, why strip them in the first place? It is unnecessary when they're not causing any real harm, and if an actually compelling reason comes up that requires their removal then as you mentioned, we can change the tag at a later date.

tl;dr: qualifiers are not the devil and do not actually hinder anyone's use of the site (except maybe those using Fumimi in Danbooru's Discord server). They provide consistency within copyrights and lessen the current and future workload on the forums as less BURs will need to be submitted and anyone approving said BURs does not need to comb through them to double-check if all the characters listed should or shouldn't be being qualified.

Unbreakable said:

Cicin is an artist tag.

7HS said:

My bad, did not notice that beforehand. Removed.

I'm surprised these first few comments aren't enough grounds that adding a qualifier from the get-go just makes life easier.

Also, it's just weird to have some characters from the same copyright to have qualifiers while others don't.

It's is very, very unlikely that we will have characters with same name as those Genshin Impact characters with unnecessary qualifiers, as most of these names are way unique, and they are written based on chinese romanization so that makes it even harder to have characters with the same name as them on danbooru. Only a few really sound ambiguous at all and need qualifier, I don't think we should give qualifier to character tags for the sake of giving them qualifiers.
Does anyone really believes we will have another character or something named as Tartaglia or Zhongli? Future-proofing only makes sense when it's something that we could see happen in the future, not for some extremly unlikely name to reappear on Danbooru.
Look at post #4506004 and tell me these overused and unncessary qualifiers doesn't make it looks ugly and polluted, and also redundant when we have the copyright tag that serves for this exact purpose of telling from which series the character comes from. Only Bennett, Albedo, Razor really needs a qualifier here.

AngryZapdos said:

Playing whack-a-mole with old character tags whenever a new character tag makes them ambiguous is a much worse solution than future-proofing it so that such a task is unnecessary.

...

If most of a copyright's character tags are unique enough then yes, there is little point in adding qualifiers as there is a very low chance that they will become ambiguous in the future

I think these two points contradict each other. Why would you future-proof tags that seem to be unique enough not to need them in the first place? It's a solution to a problem that almost certainly will not exist.

We've been looking at proper reasoning for why and why not to add qualifiers, so why not go with that by fixing tags that currently don't need (and won't) them, and adding them to tags that have good reason?

If we're talking about consistency, let's be consistent with rules that make sense going forward. Having bad tags for a particular series just because it's consistent with previous bad tags doesn't make sense. Besides, the fact that some series get this treatment and others don't is in itself inconsistent.

Let's look at reasons to actually future-proof these tags so that we can get real consistency across the site.

I'd also be interested in how often the necessity of adding a qualifier would actually occur compared to just general aliasing of tags and renaming of artists. The latter seems far more likely to happen and is taken as a matter of course. I don't see why it's being perceived as such a big job to add a qualifier in the rare case that one will be necessary in the future, let alone using such a heavy-handed and bloated solution for such a small problem.

Vezral said:

I'm surprised these first few comments aren't enough grounds that adding a qualifier from the get-go just makes life easier.

Also, it's just weird to have some characters from the same copyright to have qualifiers while others don't.

It's because it doesn't make life easier:

Say a new copyright comes around, and none of the characters have qualifiers.

Then a year later or so, for some reason, a character needs a qualifier, so it gets added.

Then, "it's weird to have some characters from the same copyright having qualifiers while others don't."

So is the solution to go back and give the entire rest of the characters in that copyright qualifiers? That's far worse than the so-called "whackamole" of dealing with one case at a time, and it will generate future threads exactly like this one in the future.

If you actually think this through, it makes more sense to apply qualifiers as minimally as possible.

Updated

Akiraka8 said:

I think these two points contradict each other. Why would you future-proof tags that seem to be unique enough not to need them in the first place? It's a solution to a problem that almost certainly will not exist.

Did you actually read my reply? I mentioned more than once that I do not think all new character tags from this point on should be qualified. If a series is mostly comprised of characters with fairly unique names but with a few characters just called "Bob" or "Steve" or similar, then only Bob and Steve should get qualifiers.

Say a new copyright comes around, and none of the characters have qualifiers.

Then a year later or so, for some reason, a character needs a qualifier, so it gets added.

Then, "it's weird to have some characters from the same copyright having qualifiers while others don't."

So is the solution to go back and give the entire rest of the characters in that copyright qualifiers? That's far worse than the so-called "whackamole" of dealing with one case at a time, and it will generate future threads exactly like this one in the future.

Again, if you'd read my reply proper you would actually know my stance on consistency qualifiers. I mentioned several times that they should only be used if around half or more of the characters from a copyright need qualifiers, and I specifically made sure to repeat this so that people would be very aware I do not support the very black-and-white "all or none" approach. However, it seems even mild subtlety is lost on the Danbooru forum, so allow me to put it as bluntly as possible:

I do not support the "all or none" approach when it comes to consistency qualifiers. It is silly to qualify every single character from a copyright if only a small amount of characters are ambiguous enough for a qualifier.

Barring potential exceptions I am unable to come up with off of the top of my head at 3AM, I believe consistency qualifiers should only be added in the following circumstances:

  • When a copyright's qualified character tags begin to outnumber its unqualified character tags
  • When a copyright contains such a large amount of characters that it makes it a chore to group together otherwise (Fire Emblem, Mega Man, Animal Crossing etc.)
  • When a copyright (usually a gacha) regularly releases new characters and character alts

As a side note, since the point I repeated three times was still missed, I feel I really must repeat something that I only mentioned once: I do not think we should hunt down all existing copyrights that fit these criteria and are not fully qualified. Unless they are already something of a mess and in need of a cleanup regardless, they are fine as they are until they become ambiguous. Would they be better if they were qualified? Yes, but like I said, a main function of consistency qualifiers is to reduce the amount of work required. A big project to fix existing tags runs contrary to this goal, but when establishing new tags it is both easy and simple to apply consistency qualifiers.

AngryZapdos said:

Did you actually read my reply? I mentioned more than once that I do not think all new character tags from this point on should be qualified. If a series is mostly comprised of characters with fairly unique names but with a few characters just called "Bob" or "Steve" or similar, then only Bob and Steve should get qualifiers.

Hence why Mona Megistus went from having a qualifier, when she was just named "Mona", to having none.

1 2 3 4