Posted under General
Jarlath said:
I put post #3013706 into the moderation queue, as I do with the odd post, just to see how long it takes to go through the queue..
Any suggestions on what I missed here to get this approved? The quality seems high enough to pass, at least on first glance.
Probably the bad feet and strong jpeg artifacts.
Jarlath said:
I put post #3013706 into the moderation queue, as I do with the odd post, just to see how long it takes to go through the queue..
Any suggestions on what I missed here to get this approved? The quality seems high enough to pass, at least on first glance.
Dunno why you have even sent it through the queue if you are clueless why it went deleted. Meaning you also realized something off or at least thought it.
Undeleted it. Don'T know why I skipped it but it looks ok.
Provence said:
Dunno why you have even sent it through the queue if you are clueless why it went deleted. Meaning you also realized something off or at least thought it.
Undeleted it. Don'T know why I skipped it but it looks ok.
I send things through the queue occasionally, especially since I'm always needing a little extra feedback. I find it better to get corrective feedback preemptively.
Will make sure to check out feet, though. I spend most of my time on tablet and mobile, so jpeg issues are harder to spot.
Right, lets get some critique going.
Chimera99 said:
Fate grand order
So this one got approved after posting here but I do still want to say that posting a single page of a comic is often going to lead to a rejection. Comics rarely have the artistic quality moderators are looking for in a post. If posted together with the rest of the comic in a pool we get a narrative that can be appealing but on its own a single page would have to stand on its artistic merit alone.
Kyusey said:
The linework is somewhat pixelated here. The stylistic choice of having a grayscale image on a coloured background doesnt really work in the images favour. Her right breast looks like a balloon and the image is kinda lowres.
Radjah said:
post #2999267 (nude version was approved)
post #3009839Timeout:
post #2984261
post #2984260
1st one: If you look at the uploader/approver you will find that the nude version was not in fact approved, it was uploaded by a member with unrestricted upload rights. I doubt it would survive a flagging.
As for the image itself. The lines look jagged and artifacty, has it been upscaled? The shading around her knees and belly isnt great and although I applaud the realistic body fat I suspect that turned a few approvers away to.
2nd one: Cant really help you here. Her fingers are a bit noodley but other than that it looks like a fine image to me.
3rd and 4th: That vagina is anatomical nonsense and Im rather certain I have seen it copy pasted on other images before. She seems to be floating above the wagon in the last image.
___________________
Now its my turn to ask whats wrong with post #3015260. Ive tried looking for flaws but it seems both well drawn and interesting to me.
Updated
original
post #3018886post #3018873
Restored
====
What's wrong with thees pairs of pictures?
post #3018881 + post #3018879
post #3018876 + post #3018875
Pending:
post #3024243 + post #3024238
Updated
post #3016822 & child
post #2485120 & child
Back into the fray.
Chimera99 said:
original
The first thing that hits me is how jagged and pixelated it is (jpeg artifacts?). Its grayscale and kinda small, and while the text might say something clever without a translation it subtracts rather than ad to the art. While her face does get the "talking with her mouth full" point across it doesnt make a "pretty" face. The only appealing things in the image are the outfit and the oversized breasts. That was not enough to make the moderators approve it.
Radjah said:
What's wrong with thees pairs of pictures?
post #3018881 + post #3018879
post #3018876 + post #3018875Pending:
post #3024243 + post #3024238
While there are minor flaws like the mouth in the firs pair and the thigh gap in the third pair the real problem is that there are millions of solo girl images on Danbooru (Not an exaggeration). Images need to stand out in some way to get the approvers attention and these girls are quite generic (there are a quarter of a million posts with animal ear girls). I would probably approve the second pair if I had the power but it is borderline.
Chimera99 said:
post #3016822 & child
post #2485120 & child
Once again comics without context. Comics that are pooled to form a continuous story tend to get judged on that story but when someone only uploads one or two pages the approvers has to judge them on art quality alone.
The first pair are mediocrely drawn and mostly monochrome. Non of the individual panels stand on their own and the only thing I get from the action is that some kind of evil transformation is happening.
The second pair has better art but are of lower resolution. The "story" is that a girl with oversized breasts gives a guy pazuri. I kinda doubt uploading the whole comic would have helped here. As a thought experiment compare the first panel of the comic with one of the posts Radjah asked about above. Surely you can see that it is of an inferior artistic quality. If they couldnt get approved what chance does your image stand.
I should really put this in my clipboard manager. Sexually explicit images are less likely to be approved than other images.
I've got three from the same artist that were deleted:
post #3027931
post #3027930
post #3027924
Similar stuff from the same artist was approved, but these got deleted.
The last was even in colour, which much of the artist's work here isn't.
post #3034161 looks like it's gonna be deleted soon. Why?
Runty said:
post #3034161 looks like it's gonna be deleted soon. Why?
One thing that is notable at first sight is the extremely thin and short raised arm. This alone gives that image a pretty weird look as it's directly in the center.
(Also, while it's not not explicitely stated in the thread's rules, I would argue that you should wait until it gets deleted. Deletions are delayed, though.)
There something wrong with these post's?
post #3028321
post #3027635
post #2972623
post #3027691
post #2861487
post #2829930
post #2860434
post #2595337
post #2770432
post #2730069
post #2780260
post #2780279
post #2778700
post #2782828
post #2771435
post #2797771
post #2797786
post #2812084
post #2812347
post #2813142
post #2819078
post #3025186
post #2804076
Maxx98 linked:
Too many posts
From howto:deletion_appeals:
Appeal Deletions a few at a time. This makes it easier for the Mods and Janitors. Long appeal lists look daunting, and may look like an attempt to rake in a high post count. Remember, Moderation on Danbooru is all about quality, never quantity.
Chimera99 said:
Touhou
I posted similer work from this artist.
The proportions between head, body and breasts are of. I realise this is probably intentional but I know some approvers dont like that. (I personally dont like the thin neck.)
The line art is made up of simple bold lines. This conflicts with the detailed colouring of her shirt and cleavage. The breasts also has much better colouring and shading than the face and hair, almost like they are from different works.
Its not a terrible image, better than some you've asked about earlier in this thread, but its not good enough for Danbooru.
You have posted similar works from this artist and half of them got deleted. Please do compare the deleted posts with the approved ones and try to learn whats accepted on this site.
ygm_1 said:
I've got three from the same artist that were deleted:
post #3027931
post #3027930
post #3027924Similar stuff from the same artist was approved, but these got deleted.
The last was even in colour, which much of the artist's work here isn't.
Posting untranslated comics is always a risk. Many mods dont know Japanese so they are unlikely to approve what they dont understand. I can only assume that the approvers that do know Japanese did not find them interesting.
If you did some more research before posting you would have found that the artist has almost as many deleted images as approved ones, so your first argument falls on that.
Yes the coloured image looks better than the other but for it to get approved on artwork alone it would have to be as good as what you find if you search: approver:any -comic.
Maxx98 said:
There something wrong with these post's?
post #3028321
post #3027635
post #2972623
post #3027691
post #2861487
post #2829930
post #2860434
post #2595337
post #2770432
post #2730069
post #2780260
post #2780279
post #2778700
post #2782828
post #2771435
post #2797771
post #2797786
post #2812084
post #2812347
post #2813142
post #2819078
post #3025186
post #2804076
Yes.
Sarcasm aside there are to many posts for me to comment on, let alone give exhaustive critique.
Many of the posts has good looking tanks but poorly drawn anime girls. While there certainly are approvers that like tanks I doubt there are approvers that likes tanks but not anime girls. This would encompass in a rough order of badnes: post #2972623, post #2778700 (also unpopular art style), post #2813142, post #2804076, post #2812084 (also bad linework), post #3027635, and post #3027691 (again bad lines).
post #2771435 has horribly drawn western style men. Official art ≠ good art Im afraid.
post #3028321 post #2812347 and to some extent post #2861487 has a weird art style which leaves out a lot of details. Not saying this is inherently a bad thing but its apparently not appreciated by the approvers. (I would have approved post #2812347 because of the cute sett up.)
post #2860434 has some very western art style men in it. The big World of tanks logo would have turned me away but thats obviously gotten through before.
post #3025186 has some blotchy details and pixely lines, like its had its format changed or something. Its also lineart which is not to everyones taste.
post #2730069 and post #2829930 are quite good IMO and post #2595337 is hilarious. I can only assume the Mods are to young to have seen the wonderfully bad Knight rider.
The rest are kinda generic or a bit lowres.
Chimera99 said:
I'd say this is an sum of multiple small errors.
Short thighs, very large hand near her face, neck looks like it is just glued onto her clavicle without any consideration of her spine and the most famous reason: Detached torso from the ass. Considering where the abdomen starts (the black obi) and where the ass ends. It makes a pretty long abdomen then.
One error alone wouldn't destroy this image, maybe even not the last point, but the length of the thighs and abdomen are kinda related to each other. It easily turns this image weird, despite the relative good coloring.
This one looks like it's about to be deleted. What specifically is wrong with it? If it's quality-related, I think it's supposed to emulate the artwork used in early Sailor Moon mangas.
