Any thoughts on why it was ignored?
Posted under General
Any thoughts on why it was ignored?
Post was approved. After the flag with a note (Bad pelvis which is fused with her thigh.), it was deleted. For problems with anatomy, there is a bad anatomy tag. Can anybody explain? And is there a chance for a new approval?
MrLight said:
Post was approved. After the flag with a note (Bad pelvis which is fused with her thigh.), it was deleted. For problems with anatomy, there is a bad anatomy tag. Can anybody explain? And is there a chance for a new approval?
A tag is never an excuse for a deletion. If we apply this to every deleted post then you could tag any deleted posts with bad anatomy and say it should be undeleted. That's pretty poor logic if you ask me when we say there are bad anatomy tags.
As for the deletion, this is my flag and I think I said pretty much everything for this image.
Maybe it will get undeleted and the chance of it getting undeleted increased by posting it here. So, maybe you have luck with this.
MrLight said:
Post was approved. After the flag with a note (Bad pelvis which is fused with her thigh.), it was deleted. For problems with anatomy, there is a bad anatomy tag. Can anybody explain? And is there a chance for a new approval?
bad anatomy and deletion are not mutually exclusive. In fact more often than not bad anatomy pictures will end up being deleted - tags are there to categorize pictures, not to excuse them from judgement.
I'm honestly confused because all of wantan-orz's pictures are pretty quality yet for some reason some pictures randomly aren't getting approved.
Too sketchy?
Been a while since I did a critiqueathon.
Runty said:
8 days agoThis one looks like it's about to be deleted. What specifically is wrong with it? If it's quality-related, I think it's supposed to emulate the artwork used in early Sailor Moon mangas.
A tricky one. The lines are rough and in some areas broken. The colouring is very purple/pink/orange, not a problem in itself but the blend clashes in an uncomfortable way in this image (I hope that made sense).
"Intentionally bad" can be an argument for keeping an image on the site but it is in no way a certain one. Danbooru works by approvers approving what they like and apparently non of them liked this one.
Pata-Hikari said:
I'm honestly confused because all of wantan-orz's pictures are pretty quality yet for some reason some pictures randomly aren't getting approved.
I hate to be crass but no, all of Wantan-orzs images arent good quality. I would say most of them are just above the limit for what is normally accepted and several wouldnt survive a flagging.
1st example: Linework and shading are both quite simple. The image is also kinda small. Ranma-chan has been turned into some kind of dwarf, her right hand looks bad and her right thigh does not connect to her hip correctly. Tsubasas right hand is also pretty horrible.
2nd example: The composition is downright boring. Linework and colouring is again quite simple. There is something "of" about Nabikis head but I cant quite determine what it is. Akanes neck is of centre.
Squishy said:
Too sketchy?
I would have said yes but apparently PhonixG disagreed.
Chimera99 said:
Its a bit sketch like, especially her left hand and the blouse buttons. The colouring is bleeding through the linework in several places. I cant tell what it is she is eating. Is her armpit talking? The post is also severely undertagged though I doubt that had much effect on it not getting approved.
post #3053461The background/chair is really sketched in but I don't believe it looks any worse than the typical character focused image with a simple background. Is there anything else in particular wrong with it?
e: Thank you.
Updated
sorgen said:
The background/chair is really sketched in but I don't believe it looks any worse than the typical character focused image with a simple background. Is there anything else in particular wrong with it?
I initially skipped this post because the perspective seemed a bit weird in the stomach area, making the lower body seem shifted in respect to the torso, but after looking at it again I have to admit it's not that bad. I approved it.
Why was post #3058120 and post #3058749 was deleted? I thought they were fine. smfh
MarquisNYC said:
Why was post #3058120 and post #3058749 was deleted? I thought they were fine. smfh
post #3058749 looks pretty Western and not anime-styled. At least the one on the right has some dubious proportions/anatomy too, with her thigh being twice as wide as her torso. (Can’t really tell for the one on the left; might be just baggy pants and her tail.)
MarquisNYC said:
Why was post #3058120 and post #3058749 was deleted? I thought they were fine. smfh
post #3058120 is very amateurish - there's next to no shading, making the picture appear extremely flat, and the style does not justify the lack of sense of depth and the very barebone background. It's not really that good of a picture.
Not entirely sure why post #3056649 and post #3047687 weren't approved.
post #3063500 is in my deleted list but I'm not even the tagger.
Kind of new to this D:
Updated
natyusha said:
post #3063500 is in my deleted list but I'm not even the tagger.
Just to clarify, your deleted list searches for user:natyusha status:deleted (that pic won't show up because it's not deleted yet), but the name displayed on each post is the name of whoever added the most tags to a post (it's a recent change, see topic #15088). So you were the uploader for that post but not the top tagger - even if you're not given credit for the upload, you'll still get a hit to upload slots if it gets deleted.
nonamethanks said:
but the name displayed on each post is the name of whoever added the most tags to a post (it's a recent change, see topic #15088)
Thanks for the info