ion288 said:
post #2677398
Are the nipple less breasts enough to warrant a Q?
I’d say neither the downblouse nor the Marilyn Monroe-esque skirt lift qualify as “clearly lacking sexual content”, as the Rating Guidelines call it, for a safe rating.
Posted under General
ion288 said:
post #2677398
Are the nipple less breasts enough to warrant a Q?
I’d say neither the downblouse nor the Marilyn Monroe-esque skirt lift qualify as “clearly lacking sexual content”, as the Rating Guidelines call it, for a safe rating.
post #34363 locked to q.
Also shouldnt post #2821650 and post #2815238 be q?
Updated
ion288 said:
post #34363 locked to q.
The Rating Guidelines say that only “tasteful” pantyshots qualify for a safe rating and I’d say that if the girl is embarrassed and doesn’t like it, it doesn’t count as “tasteful”.
Meanwhile, Unbreakable apparently thinks it’s tasteful...
kittey said:
The Rating Guidelines say that only “tasteful” pantyshots qualify for a safe rating and I’d say that if the girl is embarrassed and doesn’t like it, it doesn’t count as “tasteful”.
Meanwhile, Unbreakable apparently thinks it’s tasteful...
Well you don't see much so I thought it would be safe with a safe rating, feel free to change it if you think I'm wrong.
But for the other two linked, I'm leaning more towards q.
post #34363 isn't revealing at all and the panty exposure is accidental, so in my opinion it is clearly Safe. The general idea is that Questionable images should contain erotic nudity or sexual activity, an outfit or viewing angle that might be considered titillating isn't enough.
Flopsy said:
post #34363 isn't revealing at all and the panty exposure is accidental, so in my opinion it is clearly Safe. The general idea is that Questionable images should contain erotic nudity or sexual activity, an outfit or viewing angle that might be considered titillating isn't enough.
Well, no. To be rated safe, it needs to be “clearly lacking all sexual content”, otherwise it’s questionable. “An outfit or viewing angle that might be considered titillating” is not “clearly lacking all sexual content” and should therefore be rated questionable.
Any sexual activity visible actually disqualifies a post for a questionable rating because that’s already explicit.
I’m not surprised that you consider it safe, though, because the safe rating seems to be getting watered down a lot. Same with the questionable rating, as you just demonstrated.
Updated
Flopsy said:
post #34363 isn't revealing at all and the panty exposure is accidental, so in my opinion it is clearly Safe. The general idea is that Questionable images should contain erotic nudity or sexual activity, an outfit or viewing angle that might be considered titillating isn't enough.
Yeah, I'd rate it safe as well. Safe != Safe For Work. In fact, a girl in underwear only is considered safe as long as her pose or behavior doesn't indicate anything sexual. Even partially nude can be considered safe, especially if it's an artistic nude.
post #2847242
Was rated Safe, I changed it to Q due to the nipple slip. Is it okay?
紫希貴 said:
post #2847242
Was rated Safe, I changed it to Q due to the nipple slip. Is it okay?
You don't have to ask here for every change you did.
I think the guidelines are pretty clear here, so I don't say yes/no here (tapnek already did anyway :3).
post #124897 locked to Q. Higher resolution parent is S.
post #2873931: There's a nipple, but the image isn't really sexual in nature. Rated it Q to err on the side of caution, but should it actually be Safe?
☆♪ said:
post #2873931: There's a nipple, but the image isn't really sexual in nature. Rated it Q to err on the side of caution, but should it actually be Safe?
Nipples are Q.
Found a truckload of posts with groping rating:s. Isnt groping sexual by definition?
A few examples in decreasing "sexnes" order:
post #2869639
post #2855288
post #135025
post #2761721
Which of these are safe if any?
ion288 said:
Found a truckload of posts with groping rating:s. Isnt groping sexual by definition?
A few examples in decreasing "sexnes" order:
post #2869639
post #2855288
post #135025
post #2761721Which of these are safe if any?
All of them look safe to me. Questionable would be more along the line of showing more nude skin like nipples or a partially visible vulva, while explicit would be showing genitalia (vagina/fully exposed pussy, and/or the penis). Yes, groping the breasts is a sexual activity, but these characters are fully clothed and the act seems contextually harmless in those posts. It would be questionable if rape was involved.
Huh. howto:rate specifically mentions mild sexual contact to be rated Q. The first two would seem to fit that to me.
Is post #152320 E? Its an android with an ignition key where her pussy should be so that would make it Q right?
post #103161 post #103164 post #110033 and post #109301 locked to Q. Why?