Posted under General
Unbreakable said:
I have to say that I agree that it should at least be questionable if not explicit, would never rate this as safe because of implied stuff.
Hillside_Moose said:
It's too tame for E.
Looks like consensus is for it to be Questionable. I will acquiesce and rate accordingly in the future.
Also post #11817 is locked to Q. Looks like a Safe pantyshot.
tapnek said:
With the amount of requests you're making in regards to locked posts, if I could, I would promote you to Builder so could edit those yourself. You seem to have good judgment there.
Still a few too many requests to misrate towards safe, I’d say. The amount of requests regarding older posts shows how much the ratings have been watered down over the years already. :-/
Edit: The latter part was general lamenting on my part and not aimed at anyone in particular.
Updated
kittey said:
Still a few too many requests to misrate towards safe, I’d say. The amount of requests regarding older posts shows how much the ratings have been watered down over the years already. :-/
Fair enough. Though I have adjusted my rating to be more conservative over the last few days and I did go back and reverted some of my earlier safe ratings.
post #2913777
I don't see why is this rated questionable.
post #2925267
I'd say it's safe, because he is still male. But the opinions are split apparantly.
Chiera said:
post #2925267
I'd say it's safe, because he is still male. But the opinions are split apparantly.
I say that ratings for traps should be the same as for girls so exposed nipples should make it Q on the basis that it looks like a girl.
This apparently got changed to a Q rating despite no over sexual characteristics such as nipples (not even covered ones) being on display. It's just cleavage; nothing more, nothing less. Thought I'd ask around for further opinions.
Kyuzeth said:
This apparently got changed to a Q rating despite no over sexual characteristics such as nipples (not even covered ones) being on display. It's just cleavage; nothing more, nothing less. Thought I'd ask around for further opinions.
I agree.
Changed it back to safe.
post #17177 locked to Q. Looks safe to me.
post #17000. Is this tasteful lingerie?
ion288 said:
post #17177 locked to Q. Looks safe to me.
post #17000. Is this tasteful lingerie?
I unlocked it. Both look safe to be honest.
nonamethanks said:
I unlocked it. Both look safe to be honest.
Thanks. How about post #17388?
ion288 said:
Thanks. How about post #17388?
I personally would rate that as Q if only because there's nothing "tasteful" about that lingerie, it's very clear that it's a bondage outfit.
post #107450 locked to Q. Looks S
ion288 said:
post #107450 locked to Q. Looks S
I agree, fixed.
post #20064
Locked to Q. Her shirt is transparent enough to see her bra but it is a rather discrete bra. S?
post #2658836
Is this Safe nudity or is she holding that towel in a sufficiently risque way to warrant a Q?
ion288 said:
post #20064
Locked to Q. Her shirt is transparent enough to see her bra but it is a rather discrete bra. S?post #2658836
Is this Safe nudity or is she holding that towel in a sufficiently risque way to warrant a Q?
I'd say the first is safe and the second one too.
They are nude, but if we break it down, we only really see Tenryuus cleavage and this image isn't provocative in any way. So I'd go with S.
post #192581 post #23107 and post #22811 are all locked to Q. They seem safe to me according to current rating standards.
post #22879 Is also locked. Is that dress risque enough for that?
