Ratings check thread

The ladies' breasts are obviously prominent in those examples, but I don't think that's enough to categorize the pictures as erotica. I have switched the ratings back to Safe (I left post #2485543, where there is unambiguous cameltoe, as Questionable, although a case can be made for that one being Safe as well).

user #491852 has been switching a lot of swimsuit/cleavage/cameltoe shots to Questionable/Explicit. Many of those re-ratings are dubious, but some of the re-rated cases are sufficiently blatant and/or sexually charged to make the new rating reasonable, if only just.

Edit: Ninja'd. I think there will always be some case-by-case judgment involved in choosing the appropriate rating. No set of rating criteria written in howto:rate will ever be both completely exhaustive and completely correct.

id:2499056,2499058,2499061

Are bottomless pictures that don't show genitalia supposed to be questionable or safe? howto:rate seems to say Safe, but I wasn't sure if it was up-to-date with current practices.

Huh, I think questionable is more appropriate here.
"For images that may contain some non-explicit nudity or sexual content"

post #2498707. I upped the rating to E, given the content, but I want to make sure that was the right idea. If not, I'll revert it myself.

MFZbdude said:

post #2498707. I upped the rating to E, given the content, but I want to make sure that was the right idea. If not, I'll revert it myself.

I agree with you.

post #2508672 and any other post with the oral_invitation tag where nothing sexual is going on.
Some are rated questionable, some are rated safe. Not sure what it's supposed to be.

If there wasn't that much saliva and the image wasn't so focused on her mouth, I would rate it as Safe.

post #381329

Rating locked to E, should be Q.

http://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/2373465

Does this post really warrant a Questionable rating? I'd say the worst on this is the underside of her left thigh being exposed, but is that enough for it to be rated Questionable? There's not even any groin exposure, let alone her private parts. The same would apply to the child post, naturally.

Thank you for reading.

Looks "safe" to me.

post #2513757

I feel like this should be Questionable but I just want to make sure. If it is, it gets the loli tag.

tapnek said:

post #2513757

I feel like this should be Questionable but I just want to make sure. If it is, it gets the loli tag.

I also feel in-between about this, but lean towards a safe rating.

http://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/2297398

Does this warrant a Questionable rating? Part of Camilla's inner thighs are visible, but that's the closest thing and her groin is otherwise still completely covered. On top of that, female Corrin/Kamui's outfit exposes her inner thighs and panties as well, so I'd personally say this looks Safe rather than Questionable.

Looks "safe" to me.

post #2530660

I think this should be questionable, but I'd like to make sure.

Definitely Questionable.

post #2533103

Satori is definitely bottomless here, but nothing is really exposed. Would this be enough to be considered questionable? I am unsure.

It's safe. And besides, she could be wearing highleg panties for all I know.

post #2524895
post #2474787
post #2523729

First one's Questionable. The rest are Safe.