A sudden platinum upgrade raffle has appeared!
Donmai

The Great Fate Character Retagging Project

Posted under Tags

You can't use other series as precedent because Fate as a content generator has no precedent. I can't think of literally any other anime work on Danbooru that makes such extensive use of alternate identities such that they use their own tags.

Seiba has Alter, Lily, Lancer, Lancer Alter, Swimsuit, the upcoming Swimsuit Maid Alter, X, X Alter, Santa Alter and a host of other alternates that haven't been made playable in FGO yet.

And it's not just Seiba:

  • Jeanne has Alter and Santa Alter.
  • Cu has Prototype, Caster and Alter.
  • Emiya has Alter.
  • Medusa has Lancer and Gorgon.
  • Medea has Medea Lily.
  • 100 Face Hassan has all the alternate faces. (Female, Child and Male, off the top of my head)
  • Nero has Bride and Venus.
  • Gil has Caster, Kid Gil and Prototype.
  • Liz has Saber and Caster and it's super likely they'll keep up the meme and make another new *Liz this Halloween too.
  • Alex and Isk are technically the same person, even if we don't treat them the same tag-wise.
  • Waver has El-Melloi.
  • Gilles has his Saber version.
  • Lancelot has his Saber version.
  • Kintoki has his Rider version.
  • Tamamo has Tamacat and potentially 7(8? I forgot) other tails.
  • Rin has Ishtar and Ereshkigal.
  • Kerry and his Assassin persona are technically distinct.
  • Same with Iri and Dress of Heaven.
  • Taiga has Jaguarman.
  • Kiara has her Beast version, if you wanna get technical.

And all the swimsuits, of course. Kiyohime, Seiba, Martha, Scach, Nobu, Nito, Raikou, yuri pirates, Marie, Tamamo and Alter all have or are confirmed to have swimsuit editions. (And that list should have 3 more added by the time summer 2017 rolls around)

And to be honest I hadn't quite realized just how fucking many there were until I listed them.

It almost feels like people don't read my post and then just assume what was written there.

@G-SANtos
I already know that stuff you are talking about. I even support the move to redirect most implications. My issue was specifically with saber_alter and saber_lily implications, as well as few other details. Reasons to keep these implications were already voiced in this topic.
I also said that I support corrections listed by NWF Renim earlier. Please read second page of this topic for full context.

remove implication medusa_(lancer)_(fate) -> rider
remove implication gorgon_(fate) -> rider

create implication rider -> medusa_(fate)_(all)
create alias rider -> medusa_(fate)

create implication medusa_(fate) -> medusa_(fate)_(all)
create implication medusa_(lancer)_(fate) -> medusa_(fate)_(all)
create implication medusa_(lancer_alter)_(fate) -> medusa_(fate)_(all)
create implication gorgon_(fate) -> medusa_(fate)_(all)

mass update rider_(cosplay) -> medusa_(fate)_(cosplay)

Link to request

EDIT: See topic #14691 for discussion of this bulk.

Continuing with retagging project. The reason the catchall tag is "medusa_(fate)_(all)" and not just "medusa_(fate)" is to keep medusa_(fate) for Rider in case it's decided to use True Names for the entire franchise.

EDIT: This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.

EDIT: The bulk update request #1244 (forum #134205) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

Updated by DanbooruBot

remove implication jeanne_alter_(santa_lily)_(fate) -> jeanne_alter
remove implication jeanne_alter -> ruler_(fate/apocrypha)

mass update jeanne_alter_(santa_lily)_(fate)_(cosplay) -> jeanne_d'arc_alter_santa_lily_(cosplay)
mass update jeanne_alter_(santa_lily)_(fate) -> jeanne_d'arc_alter_santa_lily
mass update jeanne_alter_(cosplay) -> jeanne_d'arc_(alter)_(fate)_(cosplay)
mass update jeanne_alter -> jeanne_d'arc_(alter)_(fate)

create implication ruler_(fate/apocrypha) -> jeanne_d'arc_(fate)_(all)
create alias ruler_(fate/apocrypha) -> jeanne_d'arc_(fate)
create implication jeanne_d'arc_(fate) -> jeanne_d'arc_(fate)_(all)
create implication jeanne_d'arc_(alter)_(fate) -> jeanne_d'arc_(fate)_(all)
create implication jeanne_d'arc_alter_santa_lily -> jeanne_d'arc_(fate)_(all)

Link to request

EDIT: See topic #14671 for discussion of this bulk.

Continuing with retagging project. I chose Jeanne this time because she seems to be the one with the most images after Artoria.
jeanne_d'arc_(fate)_(all) instead of jeanne_d'arc_(fate) so that the later can be used for Ruler in case it's decided to use True Names for pre-GO Servants.

Full name because that's the usual practice in Danbooru and because it's technically posible for the Fate series to introduce another character named Jeanne unrelated to Jeanne d'Arc.

jeanne_d'arc_alter_santa_lily instead of jeanne_d'arc_(alter_santa_lily) because her official profile doesn't use parenthesis for the Alter Santa Lily, unlike other Alter and Lily Servants, almost as if it's intended to be a full name, and no (fate) parser because that name by itself is already distinct enough to not be mistaken for any other Jeanne d'Arc character, and, if we interprete this as a full name, is technically a different name from Jeanne d'Arc.

EDIT: The bulk update request #1246 (forum #134237) has been approved by @albert.

Updated by DanbooruBot

G-SANtos said:

Continuing with retagging project. The reason the catchall tag is "medusa_(fate)_(all)" and not just "medusa_(fate)" is to keep medusa_(fate) for Rider in case it's decided to use True Names for the entire franchise.

I'm pretty sure that we will not use True Names for the entire franchise.

For one, their normal names are much more well known. And more common names are sometimes preferred, e.g. topic #14130.

Second reason, and this one is more important, is that for fate/stay_night, fate/zero, fate/extra and some others games/novels True Names were considered a spoiler. And as you can see in about:spoilers and spoilers, we try to avoid them at all costs.
I guess fate_(series) is kind of a special case since fate/grand_order made many of those names quite well known, but we should still avoid spoiling them as much as we can.

Now, I think that these two last change requests are too hasty.

First, so far we only agreed on creating umbrella character tag for Saber. For other characters it wasn't even discussed, as far as I can see.

Second, it would spoil True Names of characters that appeared before F/GO. We already did it for Saber, but this was seriously necessary for practical reasons. The situation with other characters is not even nearly as dire.

Third, for characters other than Saber these umbrella tags can be replaced by a simple tag search.
For example medusa_(fate)_(all) proposed above can be replaced by ~rider ~medusa_(lancer)_(fate) ~gorgon_(fate), and jeanne_d'arc_(fate)_(all) can be replaced with ~ruler_(fate/apocrypha) ~jeanne_alter ~jeanne_alter_(santa_lily)_(fate).

Considering issues mentioned above, I think that we currently do not need other catch-all character tags. Adjusting/removing some implications should be sufficient.

I don't want to waste half my tag allowance because somebody didn't want umbrella tags.

Also not even Type-Moon's own promotional materials treat EMIYA's name as a spoiler. The game is over 10 years old, dude.
Zero is almost as old.

Apocrypha's scheme is both confusing and pointless, since both the book and anime reveal the identities very early on.

Extra barely even bothers.

etc.

mj1234 said:

People keep adding the Saber tags to her alternates :(

Then remove the tag and message them about it while linking to this thread.

Anyways, I disagree with MyrMindservant and if implications from alternate to base character are to be deprecated, then a catchall tag is absolutely necessary to be able to search every version of that character in one single tag. The situation might not be dire yet for anyone aside from Saber, but it may become so in the future, so might as well work toward that end now.

Moreover I also really don't think we should be going to the extreme of unimplicating things like alternate forms (eg. dark_sakura/matou_sakura, saber_venus/saber_extra, hakurei_reimu_(pc-98)/hakurei_reimu, etc to use the examples brought up here) from their original forms, seeing as they genuinely are not separate characters in Fate style but rather just a different form.

mj1234's idea of tagging these situations is to me way too needlessly strict, and we absolutely need to avoid going into "Every single form of a character needs its own tag detached from the base character" territory.

Just to clarify something, this is about characters like Astolfo not being tagged "astolfo_(fate)" but "rider_of_black" and such, right? If so, I am fully in support of removing that and just tagging characters what they are actually named.

KyteM said:

I don't want to waste half my tag allowance because somebody didn't want umbrella tags.

We don't create new tags just because some searches require more than one tag. You should know this yourself.

KyteM said:

Also not even Type-Moon's own promotional materials treat EMIYA's name as a spoiler. The game is over 10 years old, dude.
Zero is almost as old.

It doesn't matter if the game is 10 years old or 20. Spoilers have no expiration date. This has been said many times in the past.
For example, Star Wars original trilogy is more than 30 years old and this doesn't change that Darth Vader's real name is a spoiler.

There are also other examples of hiding real names of characters, even if it's a minor spoiler. See tenshi_(angel_beats!) and topic #8292 (Sword Art Online).

I understand that Fate/Grand_Order reveals True Names freely, but this only means that they are not a spoiler in F/GO. Not everyone plays it or follows it. We shouldn't ignore earlier games/novels because of this.

Flandre5carlet said:

Anyways, I disagree with MyrMindservant and if implications from alternate to base character are to be deprecated, then a catchall tag is absolutely necessary to be able to search every version of that character in one single tag. The situation might not be dire yet for anyone aside from Saber, but it may become so in the future, so might as well work toward that end now.

I don't see a reason why we need to do it right now. Creating a catch-all tag and implicating other character tags to it will automatically add it to each related post. There is no tag gardening required, so doing it later, when/if it becomes a serious issue, won't be any harder than now.

Flandre5carlet said:

Moreover I also really don't think we should be going to the extreme of unimplicating things like alternate forms (eg. dark_sakura/matou_sakura, saber_venus/saber_extra, hakurei_reimu_(pc-98)/hakurei_reimu, etc to use the examples brought up here) from their original forms, seeing as they genuinely are not separate characters in Fate style but rather just a different form.

This is something I agree with. It's also why saber_alter and saber_lily should still implicate saber.

Updated

MyrMindservant said:

We don't create new tags just because some searches require more than one tag. You should know this yourself.

Allow me to repeat my question which you ignored. What would your suggestion be if somebody wanted to, let's say, look at Saber without wanting to see Saber_Alter in solo pictures without filtering the latter? Filtering saber_alter would also filter pictures with Saber + other characters if she's in there, so what would your suggestion be to avoid this particular mess?

MyrMindservant said:
For example, Star Wars original trilogy is more than 30 years old and this doesn't change that Darth Vader's real name is a spoiler.

That's funny because Darth Vader's tag is separate from anakin_skywalker. The same logic should apply to each and every series with characters different forms.

MyrMindservant said:
I don't see a reason why we need to do it right now. Creating a catch-all tag and implicating other character tags to it will automatically add it to each related post.

MyrMindservant said:
This is something I agree with. It's also why saber_alter and saber_lily should still implicate saber.

That's a contradiction.

One thing I want to discuss, in Fate/Extella, there's a Tamamo completely unrelated to the Tamamo Nine and that we know nothing about other than her being an idol. Here is her only scene. She already has some images here. What should we tag her? tamamo_(idol)_(fate)?

Also, the FGO Comic a la Carte has a scene where the Swimsuit Tamamo, Mordred, and Martha meet their original selves, as well as an entire conversation between Caster Liz and Brave Liz. I think this implies that, for FGO, different Servant = different character. The game also has Swimsuit Mordred and Swimsuit Kiyohime reacting to seeing their normal selves.
I think this gives for a stronger case for splitting Swimsuit Artoria and Santa Alter from Saber and Saber Alter. Objections? We would eventually do the same for all Swimsuit Servants and the alternate Elizabeths.

KyteM said:

And to be honest I hadn't quite realized just how fucking many there were until I listed them.

And yet, you still missed some.

Carmilla is technically Elizabeth.

Medusa has a Lancer Alter version in First Order, Armed Gorgon in Back Alley Satsuki, and Major Reiter in Koha-ACE. The later two don't have tags here yet. Capsule Servant also treats "Pegasus Rider" as its own character, but it's just Rider in casual clothes riding Bellerophon

Rin and Luvia have wrestler identities in an April Fools thing. So does Akiha from Tsukihime. These don't have tags here yet.

Irisviel has Fire Iri, Water Iri, Air Iri, and Earth Iri in FGO. I think there's also a Prisma Iri in a Prisma Illya drama CD, but it's probably just Irisviel using one of the Kaleidosticks.

Sakura has Sakurider in Fate/Extra illustrations, G-Sakura in Capsule Servant, and a Back Alley Satsuki version whose name I don't know. Sakurider has only one image here and is basically Extra Sakura cosplaying as Rider, so I don't know if we'll ever see it receiving many images.

Jeanne has Master Jeanne in Capsule Servant, and Kamikaze Magical Girl Jeanne in Back Alley Satsuki, none of which are tagged yet. Considering the precedent set by Mysterious Heroine X, we might see Kamikaze Jeanne in FGO at some point, specially since it's a costume in Fate/Extella.

Nero has Santa Saber in Fate/Extra illustrations and Idol Emperor Red Saber in Back Alley Satsuki. These aren't tagged yet but have some images here. Considering the precedent set by MHX, we might see Idol Emperor in FGO. Also, Santa Saber might make it as well as this year's Christmas Servant, since both of the previous ones were Saberfaces, and the only other Saberfaces available is Okita. Saber Santa would break the trend of the Santa Servants being Alters, though, so maybe they'll make it a variation of Devil Saber, who was retconned into Okita Alter at some point.

Capsule Servant also has Celebloomers (Illya), TOHSAKA (Basically Rin's version of EMIYA) and Little Caren.

If there are other alternate I can't remember, it's probable they are other joke characters.

KyteM said:

E: if you wanna be pedantic, her *full* full name is Jeanne d'Arc Alter Santa Lily Lancer Santa.
Because comedy. V:

In the dialogue, yes, but not in her profile, which I would say has more weight than the dialogue.

mj1234 said:

People keep adding the Saber tags to her alternates :(

Are you sure? Because when I checked, I only saw one user adding the Saber tag to posts, and I notified them of it. After that, I didn't see any new image with the Saber tag in an improper post.
I'm not sure if you are aware, but deimplicating a tag doesn't automatically remove the parent tag from post with the child tag. Maybe you are just seeing posts that haven't had the Saber tag removed yet and you didn't know it wasn't automated?

MyrMindservant said:

It doesn't matter if the game is 10 years old or 20. Spoilers have no expiration date. This has been said many times in the past.
For example, Star Wars original trilogy is more than 30 years old and this doesn't change that Darth Vader's real name is a spoiler.

There are also other examples of hiding real names of characters, even if it's a minor spoiler. See tenshi_(angel_beats!) and topic #8292 (Sword Art Online).

I understand that Fate/Grand_Order reveals True Names freely, but this only means that they are not a spoiler in F/GO. Not everyone plays it or follows it. We shouldn't ignore earlier games/novels because of this.

Except spoilers DO have expiration dates for long running franchises, or else we should tag spoilers any picture with Nanoha and Fate fighting together, Hayate transformed, or Nanoha and Fate being Vivio's mothers, because such images "spoil" Fate's heel-face turn, Hayate fighting, and Nanoha adopting Vivio.

Darth Vader's real name is NOT a spoiler, not anymore, because EVERYONE knows about it, even people who never saw any Star Wars movie.

For FGO, an interview with Nasu released before the game's release had him talking about the reason FGO was made. He wanted to have the Fate franchise reaching a wider audience. You know, like people who haven't read the novels. AND a big part of FGO is that True Names aren't secret, which he even mentioned in an early interview.
In short, he wants people who never read the novels to learn about the Servants' identities without even reading the novels. That's as close as you get to an official "it's no longer a spoiler" statement. I don't see the point in continuing this naming system when the franchise is clearly deviating from "True Name is a spoiler" territory.

Heck, FSN Assassin reveals his identity LITERALLY after showing up. It's literally pointless to claim his True Name was a spoiler even before FGO existed, and yet we tag him by his class. CCC also makes no secret of Hans's name. Also, I might be misremembering, but didn't Fate/Extella reveal Archimedes's True Name before the game came out?

MyrMindservant said:

This is something I agree with. It's also why saber_alter and saber_lily should still implicate saber.

Saber Alter and Lily are separate characters from Saber. Yeah, they might have been forms when they were released, but they became separate characters after some time. I don't exactly when it was, but I know TYPE-MOON's popularity polls have treated the three of them as separate even before FGO.

That Tamamo called herself Tamamo JK, so tamamo_jk_(fate) like how Tamamo Cat is tamamo_cat_(fate)?

And yeah all the Extella characters were known beforehand. The majority of recent promotional materials assume servant identities are a known thing.

If you don't believe me, look at a recent popularity poll:
http://i.imgur.com/AIe8okR.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/vfcyYt5.jpg

I know the quality is awful but I couldn't find the better ones. Still, it's enough to clearly see every Servant, including Emiya, referenced by name.

I don't know about giving JK Tamamo her own tag when she's only a separate character in a single gag scene that's never mentioned again. The outfit she's wearing is just the equip-able JK costume you get in game. Tamamo herself is even wearing it in a different My Room scene. I agree with the earlier sentiment that giving every variant of every character their own tag is a bad idea.

With regards to true name spoilers, I think at the very least true name tags should be aliased to make searching easier. FGO is too central and entry level not to.

Updated

G-SANtos said:

Are you sure? Because when I checked, I only saw one user adding the Saber tag to posts, and I notified them of it. After that, I didn't see any new image with the Saber tag in an improper post.
I'm not sure if you are aware, but deimplicating a tag doesn't automatically remove the parent tag from post with the child tag. Maybe you are just seeing posts that haven't had the Saber tag removed yet and you didn't know it wasn't automated?

Oh it got resolved now. Out of curiosity, should "deleted" pictures also be re-tagged?

https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/2647940?tags=saber_alter
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/2555989?tags=saber_alter

I'm also in favor of slowing things down. The main offender was Artoria, and she's been dealt with.

A spoiler for, say F/SN, is and always will be a spoiler regardless of age or outside works. It doesn't "expire" because the anime and VN fanbases are constantly growing and will always have new people entering, many of which would have never seen any promotional material or played FGO and realistically wouldn't have been exposed to any of the reveals from outside media (Fate isn't nearly as big or memeable as Star Wars). It's not treated as a big reveal in many cases, but it's still silly to ignore the cases where it is. I don't think anyone who stumbles on art of Archer from F/SN should be needlessly spoiled like that. Respecting spoilers would probably leave us with an inconsistent naming scheme, but let's not pretend like we didn't have that before.

And are there any updates on what we'll do with the copyright tags? Those could also use a cleanup.

The only thing that has been fixed is the chain of nested implications. The problems with tag names in itself is still there. The majority of the problems with the current tagging scheme are because of its inconsistency.

And part of that problem is the obsolete spoiler policy.

Your position is absurd. Products don't exist in a vacuum. The probabilities of somebody not consuming any promotional material before gaining an interest in, say, FSN, are tiny. Retaining bad policies to cater to a tiny and possibly inexistent fraction of the potential userbase in an absurdity.

Like, FSN is not even sold in the west as a product! Neither are Apocrypha (LN) or Prototype Fragments!
The current vectors to the fanbase to grow are a) the various animes, which don't hide shit, b) Fate/Extella, currently out in English for PC and major consoles, which doesn't hide anything and c) FGO, massively popular and with a western release, which is what prompted this entire discussion in first place. How exactly is somebody going to arrive to the fandom for the first time without being spoiled in the first place?

And as far as I can tell there's nothing wrong with the copyright tags.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 14