I think we need some mod assistance with flags?

Haven't these users been promoted to Builder? It should be Builder and up in that case.

Anyways, everyone agrees that at least the staff should see flaggers, so at this point it's simply about Albert finding the time to fix this.

Log said:
You can earn priv without ever paying a dime. In fact most priv users have not paid.

Fred1515 said:
Haven't these users been promoted to Builder? It should be Builder and up in that case.

I paid for my Priv but have since been promoted to Builder, so I it varies.

I'd limit to staff, since some people in Priv have definitely been among the problematic people, but Contributors also have something to lose if they get rowdy so I suppose there'd be little harm in letting them see it.

But at the same time, letting Contributors see flaggers doesn't really serve much purpose, does it?

Arrei said:
But at the same time, letting Contributors see flaggers doesn't really serve much purpose, does it?

Eyes to see where moderator action is needed is half the job of moderating, so more eyes, even powerless eyes, will help (provided they don't cause problems, of course).

Arrei said:
I'd limit to staff, since some people in Priv have definitely been among the problematic people, but Contributors also have something to lose if they get rowdy so I suppose there'd be little harm in letting them see it.

But at the same time, letting Contributors see flaggers doesn't really serve much purpose, does it?

Wouldn't do me any good, except knowing who flagged me.

I don't need to be able to see flaggers. Well, if I notice someone flagging for fun I could inform staff.

Schrobby said:
I don't need to be able to see flaggers. Well, if I notice someone flagging for fun I could inform staff.

Agree with this. Having something to lose shouldn't be the only merit that warrants a privilege. In this case, if we can't act on it, we don't need to see it. Our involvement in the process should only be pointing out bogus flags. There's no need for us to know who said what to whom.

I'm pretty sure janitors can spot a bogus flag from a real flag just as easily as the rest of you. :|

Syntax aside, the point remains. Hands off for non-staff.

This post was flagged for deletion:

• Gay - 4 days ago

Speaking of flagging abuse...

It seems like it's possible to see who flagged the image now.
Can contributor or below see this, or is it Janitor+?

Checking via post #1245001, I can't see the flagger.

Not seeing it either.

Algasir said:
Checking via post #1245001, I can't see the flagger.

Looks like Janitor+ to me.

Algasir and saizo0070 are contributors. As a member, I can't see it either.

status:flagged shows me I can see the names on post #1243296, post #1243295, post #1243278, and others flagged around 3 days ago. I can see 1/2 of the names on post #1243272 and post #1243276. I can't see names on posts flagged more recently.

E: Well that seems incredibly obvious in retrospect. Thanks

picnic said:
status:flagged shows me I can see the names on post #1243296, post #1243295, post #1243278, and others flagged around 3 days ago. I can see 1/2 of the names on post #1243272 and post #1243276. I can't see names on posts flagged more recently.

That appears to be because one of the flaggers wanted to include his name in all of his flag reasons.

It's Janitor+.

DakuTree said:
It seems like it's possible to see who flagged the image now.
Can contributor or below see this, or is it Janitor+?

Priv can't. *thumbs up*

Meanwhile, more posts are being flagged:

post #1247102 "Nice concept, but this isn't even 'sub-par'."
post #1247104 "Quality check"
post #1247125 "Long neck is looooong. Overall poorly done."

I'm all for adhering to a higher quality, and many of the flags are overdue. But some are just attacking valid styles now. That rates a down-vote; not a flag.