These two are good quality, they just don't seem to have gotten in front of the right pair of eyes.
Posted under General
These two are good quality, they just don't seem to have gotten in front of the right pair of eyes.
Hi, any feedback on why this post wasn't approved? Please give it a second chance
post #6518591
Updated
MilkDelivery said:
Thanks for the reply.
I commissioned these pieces myself. So the source i got them from is directly from the artist. I can post the receipts of my commission myself if that will help them get accepted. Would this be the thread to do it in? But i used the pixiv link with the lower resolution image as the source simply because thats the closest thing to a source. What would have been the ideal way to do it? Just use non-web source tagging?
Since they are tagged as commissioner uploads, you are allowed to leave the source blank, but if you want to make it absolutely clear, you can state you got it directly from the artist in the source field.
Receipts aren’t required as far as I know, but if you think they would help, the best place to post them is in a comment for that image. They’ll probably just get lost if you post them here.
Even with all of that in order, it may still fail due to quality issues. However, users below Approver level are discouraged from giving specific comments on quality and I’m only a Contributor, so I don’t have anything to say about the quality of your posts.
Blank_User said:
Thanks for tip. Ill do so. I think it's more just that posting >large breast art is a dice roll in terms of approval even if it's great. No matter how popular the art is elsewhere. It's extremely weird considering that art is popular with a lot of people these days.
post #9035478: only seen by 5 approverspost #9034676: only seen by 4
Both are pretty good quality-wise, any idea why they got deleted?
Thanks for the help!
Updated
Any advice?
I have some that I don't understand why weren't accepted, even after deletion appeal:
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/9037705
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/9037723
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/9037758
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/9037773
post #9030210
I asked the original approver, and the reason for the flagging was that I pasted the image link after uploading it, and he mistakenly thought it was a private image.
post #9038496
As good as other works by the same artist, his other two posts and other two posts about fgo bondage are reposted from ehentai and should belong to the source approved by the website
Anything? Why are these left unapproved?
OK, how about this one?
when I made post #8967361
there was no publicly available Pixiv link. There is now and I have added it.
Tried appealing these, but they didn’t go through. The reason I want to know why these were not approved is because I have PNG versions of these with fewer artifacts and transparent backgrounds I would like to upload. Knowing why they were deleted will help me decide whether or not to skip the queue. If it’s because of the artifacts, source, or just a matter of taste, then I should be able to upload the PNGs without worry. But if it was because of quality issues in the art itself, then I’ll want to consider sending it to the queue instead (I do still think official art like this is worth preserving if the flaws aren’t too major).
Blank_User said:
Tried appealing these, but they didn’t go through. The reason I want to know why these were not approved is because I have PNG versions of these with fewer artifacts and transparent backgrounds I would like to upload. Knowing why they were deleted will help me decide whether or not to skip the queue. If it’s because of the artifacts, source, or just a matter of taste, then I should be able to upload the PNGs without worry. But if it was because of quality issues in the art itself, then I’ll want to consider sending it to the queue instead (I do still think official art like this is worth preserving if the flaws aren’t too major).
The first one comes from a random Twitter fan account, the second from Fandom wiki, neither of which I really trust to not mess with game assets in some way. The images themselves are okay, IMO.
nth_color said:
The first one comes from a random Twitter fan account, the second from Fandom wiki, neither of which I really trust to not mess with game assets in some way. The images themselves are okay, IMO.
Was going to reply that this is what I thought. I tend to upload a good amount of datamined stuff. I know how to do it and am experienced in it and it seems to get approved for the most part. But how do approvers tell if the source or non-source is trustworthy? it just looks clean or not? Cause those images that Blank User posted are still good images like you said.
MilkDelivery said:
Was going to reply that this is what I thought. I tend to upload a good amount of datamined stuff. I know how to do it and am experienced in it and it seems to get approved for the most part. But how do approvers tell if the source or non-source is trustworthy? it just looks clean or not? Cause those images that Blank User posted are still good images like you said.
If you’re talking about the two I mentioned in the previous post, I didn’t upload those (Wait, never mind, I think I misunderstood you). But the majority of my uploads are game cgs I extracted myself and I had no trouble getting most of them approved. All you really need to do is say you extracted it from the game in the source field.
Also, it’s possible those two posts weren’t made from game assets. It could’ve just been taken off of an official website or something. Some of the other Kandagawa Jet Girls official art I posted was already on here, but at a lower resolution and more artifacts. If they were ripped from the game, then something went very very wrong.
Updated