Posted under General
SlaughteredMelon said:
I think the issue here might me the fact various Approvers are not particularly fans of giant breasts. Comparing other posts by the same artist, the others have girls with a more reasonable chest size.
oh~... So Approvers like small breasts then, I see...
Qeemo said:
Giant breasts where one is bigger than the other, and the torso anatomy is really strange, particularly in the belly area.
Qeemo said:
the torso seems look off for me
i've been having poor fortune with the modqueue. any feedback on why these three might have been rejected?
the only ideas i have are either some mistake in uploading/labeling or just the fact that they're not traditionally anime style (but is that even a requirement of the site's images?). any clarity would be great
prawncrawl said:
i've been having poor fortune with the modqueue. any feedback on why these three might have been rejected?
the only ideas i have are either some mistake in uploading/labeling or just the fact that they're not traditionally anime style (but is that even a requirement of the site's images?). any clarity would be great
Self-uploads tend to not get through the queue often, and pornographic artwork is less likely to be approved than safe artwork just in general. Western art is allowed, but approvers may scrutinize it more or be less inclined to approve it.
-------------
Anyways, what would be the matter with post #7911999? Just a cute little alternate hairstyle pic of an obscure character, and I haven't had any issues getting this artist's work approved outside of this post.
Updated
Trouble_Windows said:
Anyways, what would be the matter with post #7911999? Just a cute little alternate hairstyle pic of an obscure character, and I haven't had any issues getting this artist's work approved outside of this post.
Indeed, nothing wrong with your post. The quality doesn't differ at all from other posts of the same artists, so I suggest you to appeal it.
Trouble_Windows said:
Self-uploads tend to not get through the queue often, and pornographic artwork is less likely to be approved than safe artwork just in general. Western art is allowed, but approvers may scrutinize it more or be less inclined to approve it.
-------------
Anyways, what would be the matter with post #7911999? Just a cute little alternate hairstyle pic of an obscure character, and I haven't had any issues getting this artist's work approved outside of this post.
thanks for the insight!
so would it be better to just make another account where i pretend to not be myself? logic doesn't really make sense...the image is the image, who cares who uploads it
post #7197312 was flagged out as off-topic and manually deleted by an approver but I think it is definitely not off-topic, and I'd like to remove the tag
prawncrawl said:
so would it be better to just make another account where i pretend to not be myself?
No, because they will find out, your posts will still be tagged with self-upload, and you may even get banned from trying to circumnavigate the rules.
logic doesn't really make sense...the image is the image, who cares who uploads it
That is our current policy, but we used to heavily discourage self-uploads because many artists overestimate their abilities and are more likely to post art that does not meet quality standards. Some approvers may disagree with the site softening its stance against self-uploads and may have the tag blacklisted. That makes it harder for good self-uploads to get through, but we can't force approvers to approve things they don't want to.
Blank_User said:
That is our current policy, but we used to heavily discourage self-uploads because many artists overestimate their abilities and are more likely to post art that does not meet quality standards.
They also tend to get very irate when their art is unnapproved or judged harshly. Got an example of that just the other day.
Of course, users that don't self-upload do all of those things, too (even more illogical given they didn't even create the artwork), so it ultimately didn't really make sense to treat self-uploaders differently from anyone else. As long as it's acceptable quality and on-topic, who uploaded it shouldn't be relevant to the approval process beyond individual approver opinion.
Hi, any feedback on why these posts weren't approved? Please give a second chance.
post #7738822
post #7788993
Updated
Hello, can I get some feedback on why this one wasn't approved? post #7917984
Thanks.
Can someone tell me why https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/7897408?q=status%3Adeleted+user%3AWittyusername was sent back to the queue and deleted?
Wittyusername said:
Can someone tell me why https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/7897408?q=status%3Adeleted+user%3AWittyusername was sent back to the queue and deleted?
It was flagged for being an anime screenshot, despite it being from an official account.
post #7679510
Hello, any feedback why this post wasn't approved ? Counterpart and same quality as approved post #6751655.
Remilialover said:
post #7679510
Hello, any feedback why this post wasn't approved ? Counterpart and same quality as approved post #6751655.
Unlike its counterpart, this one has worse anatomy, particularly in the arms. Probably because the artist tried to do a foreshortening, but they didn't executed it properly.
Knowledge_Seeker said:
I'm beginning to think you just have bad luck, dude, seriously. The manga you're uploading is good enough to stay here, I don't get why these pages keep getting deleted.
